The Life and Death of a Health Promotion Program: An Institutionalization Case Study

1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Goodman ◽  
Allan B. Steckler

This article presents a case study of a health promotion program that successfully operated for four years but terminated when its federal and state funding ended, i.e., it failed to become institutionalized. The program, which was funded under the federal health education-risk reduction grants, was directed at preventing use of alcohol and tobacco among young adolescents. Evaluations indicated that the program was highly successful. The authors argue that health promotion programs can be viewed as organizational innovations in which institutionalization is the final stage of the innovation process. In the case study, institutionalization did not occur for two reasons: 1) demonstration of effective implementation was the health department's primary goal, and program institutionalization was only a latent concern and; 2) both the county commissioners and the community feared federal and state “dumping.” The “CODAPT” model of health education program planning is presented as one way of dealing with the problem of “deep” program implementation but “shallow” institutionalization. Implications of these findings for health education practice and policy are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S79-S79
Author(s):  
Ellen C Schneider ◽  
Lesley Steinman ◽  
Casey Dicocco

Abstract Evidence-based programs (EBPs) offer proven ways to promote health and prevent disease among older adults in their communities. EBPs are based on rigorous study of the effects of specific interventions or model programs, demonstrate consistently positive changes in important health-related and functional measures, and have tools in place to maintain program access, quality, and efficiency across diverse settings. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (UNC HPDP), in partnership with the Evidence-Based Leadership Collaborative (EBLC), has established a review process and Review Council to identify new community programs that meet the evidence-based program criteria established by the Administration for Community Living (ACL), one of the chief U.S. federal agencies responsible for aging programs. Approved programs are then eligible for Older Americans Act Title III-D and other discretionary funding to support organizations that deliver EBPs to improve older adult health. The review process assesses the effectiveness, outcomes, and evaluation of the program, information about program implementation, training, and other key elements for successful program dissemination. The Review Council consists of national leaders with expertise in program research, evaluation, and implementation. The review process is supported by the ACL-funded National Chronic Disease Self-Management Education and Falls Prevention Resource Centers. This session will describe the ACL evidence-based health promotion program criteria that must be met for approval; an overview of the review process; and how researchers can submit their programs for review. Time will be allowed for questions, discussion, and research to practice implications.



1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra G. Froberg ◽  
Carolyn L. Williams ◽  
Nancy V. Mate






2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Kathryn Berlin ◽  
Whitney Boling ◽  
Darleesa Doss ◽  
Tyler Nolting

Experiential learning to address the Areas of Responsibility and Competencies for health education specialists is scarce or limited in scope in the pedagogy literature. The purpose of this article is to describe the process in which faculty applied a unique experiential learning approach wherein students were involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating (PIE) a health promotion program over the course of an academic year. The PIE approach allowed faculty to modify and revise course objectives to better align outcomes with the Areas of Responsibility and Competencies for health education specialists. This article provides an overview of the past 4 years using the PIE approach, a synopsis of the various steps faculty employed to use this model, and student perception of the approach as a learning tool.



2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Kim ◽  
Vinayak K. Nahar

Planning, Implementing & Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: A Primer is a versatile and comprehensive resource on the theoretical and practical underpinnings of successful health promotion programs. The requirements for effective health promotion program development are presented with frequent use of practical planning examples, pedagogical devices, and expert rationale. Ideal for undergraduate and graduate students in health education, promotion, and planning courses, this 15-chapter textbook is organized in a manner that specifically addresses the responsibilities and competencies required of health education specialists as published in the Health Education Specialist Practice Analysis of 2015. The authors of this textbook are leaders in the field and provide readers with the skills necessary to carry out the full process of health promotion program execution, while also offering direct preparation for CHES and MCHES licensing exams.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document