scholarly journals Promoting Collaborative Goal Setting for Cancer Prevention Among Primary Care Patients through mHealth: a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a New Application (Preprint)

10.2196/22510 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Resnick ◽  
Marilyn M. Schapira ◽  
Jazmine M. Smith ◽  
Allison Bautista ◽  
Chang Xu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Resnick ◽  
Marilyn M. Schapira ◽  
Jazmine M. Smith ◽  
Allison Bautista ◽  
Chang Xu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Many newly diagnosed cancers are associated with modifiable lifestyle behaviors, such as diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and maintaining a healthy weight. Despite this, primary care providers rarely discuss cancer prevention behaviors with their patients. OBJECTIVE To assess the usability, acceptability and engagement of the Healthier Together mobile application, which is designed to promote cancer prevention behaviors among Non-Hispanic Black primary care patients, utilizing social network and goal setting theories of behavior change. METHODS In an eight-week pilot study, we enrolled primary care patients (n=41) and provided these participants with a cancer prevention mobile application that allowed them to select, track, and share progress on cancer prevention goals with other users. We assessed application usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). We assessed app acceptability by qualitatively analyzing open-ended responses about participants’ overall experience with the app. We assessed participant engagement by analyzing the built-in data capture, including how many times participants checked in (out of a maximum of eight) during the study. RESULTS Of 41 participants, the mean age was 51 (SD: 12) and 31 (76%) were women. App use data was captured for all participants and 34 (83%) completed the exit survey and interview. The mean SUS score was 87 (SD ±12; median 90; IQR 78-95). Analysis of open-ended responses revealed several key themes, with participants complementing the application’s ease of use and health behavior promoting features, while also commenting on the need for more feedback and social interactions through the application. On average, participants checked in 5.7 times (SD: 2.7) out of eight possible opportunities. Thirty-one participants (76%) checked in during at least 4 of the 8 weeks. Secondary analyses revealed that participants often accomplished their set goal (mean: 5.1, SD: 2.7) for each week. Qualitative analysis of comments participants left within the app after each weekly check-in revealed several themes on how the app assisted participants in behavioral change, highlighting that some participants built up exercise programs, ate healthier foods, lost a significant amount of weight, and stopped smoking during the study. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a mobile cancer prevention goal setting application in a primary care setting was feasible with high usability, acceptability, and engagement from participants. User feedback revealed an influence on health behaviors. These findings suggest the promise of the HT application to facilitate behavioral change to reduce cancer risk among Non-Hispanic Black primary care patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Resnick ◽  
Matthew D Kearney ◽  
Jazmine M Smith ◽  
Allison Bautista ◽  
Liz Jones ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND There remains a need to engage at-risk primary care populations in cancer prevention behaviors, yet primary care physicians often lack the time or resources to discuss these behaviors with their patients. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the content, usability, and acceptability of a mobile application that leverages insights from goal-setting and social networks literature to facilitate cancer prevention goal setting, tracking, and sharing between Non-Hispanic Black primary care patients and their social ties. METHODS We recruited participants from two primary care clinics in Philadelphia using non-probabilistic purposive sampling. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 5 to 7 participants over three weeks to solicit feedback on paper mock-ups of the application, iteratively adapting these mock-ups after each set of interviews. Thereafter, and informed by initial feedback, we created an electronic beta-version of the application and sought acceptability and usability feedback from a different set of participants. Then we conducted content analysis of all user responses to search for unifying themes on acceptability and usability of both the initial mock-ups and beta-version of the application. We further assessed application usability using questions derived from the System Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS Thirty-three Non-Hispanic Black primary care patients participated in the study. The mean age was 49 (SD ± 13) and 79% identified as female. Semi-structured interviews revealed three primary generalizable insights from our target population: 1) the framing of each goal and its relevance to cancer impacted the likelihood the goal would be chosen; 2) participants thought that sharing health goals with others facilitates health behaviors; and 3) most participants found it motivating to see other users’ goal progress, while still collaborating with these users on their health goals. An overarching insight that permeated across each theme was the participants’ desire to customize and personalize the app. Usability testing revealed that 100% of participants found the application easy to use and 76% of participants reported they would like to use this application frequently. CONCLUSIONS Cancer prevention in the modern era must include options that are accessible to all, but this does not mean that all options must be universal. This study’s iterative process led to the development of a cancer prevention mobile application that Non-Hispanic Black primary care patients deemed usable and acceptable and yielded a number of noteworthy insights about what intended end-users value in setting and accomplishing health goals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Mc Namara ◽  
Ines Krass ◽  
Gregory M. Peterson ◽  
Hamzah Alzubaidi ◽  
Rob Grenfell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (691) ◽  
pp. e120-e129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M Kesten ◽  
Kyla Thomas ◽  
Lauren J Scott ◽  
Kevin Bache ◽  
Matthew Hickman ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrimary care opioid prescribing to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has progressively increased despite a lack of evidence for long-term safety and effectiveness. Developing primary care interventions to reduce opioid dependence in patients with CNCP is a public health priority.AimTo report the acceptability of the South Gloucestershire pain and opioid review service for patients with CNCP, which aimed to help patients understand their relationship with prescribed opioids and support non-drug-based pain management strategies.Design and settingA mixed-methods evaluation was performed on the service, which was based in two GP practices in South Gloucestershire, England, and delivered by project workers.MethodDescriptive data were collected on delivered-within-service and community-based interventions. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews (n = 18 patients, n = 7 service providers) explored experiences of the service.ResultsThe enrolment process, person-centred primary care-based delivery, and service content focused on psychological issues underlying CNCP were found to be acceptable to patients and service providers. Patients welcomed having time to discuss their pain, its management, and related psychological issues. Maintaining a long-term approach was desired as CNCP is a complex issue that takes time to address. GPs recommended that funding was needed to ensure they have dedicated time to support a similar service and to ensure that project workers received adequate clinical supervision.ConclusionThis service model was acceptable and may be a useful means to manage patients with CNCP who develop opioid dependence after long-term use of opioids. A randomised controlled trial is needed to formally test the effectiveness of the service.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Boon Tar Lim ◽  
Wei Keong Wee ◽  
Wei Chek For ◽  
Jayalakshmy Aarthi Ananthanarayanan ◽  
Ying Hua Soh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Primary care patients with prediabetes is a priority group in the clinical, organisational and policy contexts. Engaging in regular physical activity is crucial to prevent diabetes for this group. The objectives of the study were to assess factors associated with meeting the recommendation of at least 150 min of moderate/vigorous physical activity weekly, and to explore facilitators and barriers related to the behaviour among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore. Methods This was a mixed methods study, consisting of a cross-sectional survey involving 433 participants from 8 polyclinics, and in-depth interviews with 48 of them. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were obtained by mixed effects Poisson regression model. The socio-ecological model (SEM) was applied, and thematic analysis performed. Results The prevalence of meeting the recommendation was 65.8%. This was positively associated with being male (aPR 1.21, 95%CI 1.09–1.34), living in 4–5 room public housing (aPR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07–1.31), living in executive flat/private housing (aPR 1.26, 95%CI 1.06–1.50), having family members/friends to exercise with (aPR 1.57, 95%CI 1.38–1.78); and negatively associated with a personal history of osteoarthritis (aPR 0.75, 95%CI 0.59–0.96), as well as time spent sitting or reclining daily (aPR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94–0.98). The recurrent themes for not meeting the recommendation included lacking companionship from family members/friends, medical conditions hindering physical activity (particularly osteoarthritis), lacking knowledge/skills to exercise properly, “no time” to exercise and barriers pertaining to exercise facilities in the neighbourhood. The recurrent themes for meeting the recommendation included family/peer influence, health/well-being concerns and education by healthcare professionals. Conclusions Much more remains to be done to promote physical activity among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore. Participants reported facilitators and barriers to physical activity at different levels of the SEM. Apart from the individual and interpersonal levels, practitioners and policy makers need to work together to address the organisational, community and policy barriers to physical activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document