scholarly journals Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation (Preprint)

10.2196/34201 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Liu ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Fahad Javaid Siddiqui ◽  
Andrew Fu Wah Ho ◽  
Bibhas Chakraborty ◽  
...  



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Liu ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Fahad Javaid Siddiqui ◽  
Andrew Fu Wah Ho ◽  
Bibhas Chakraborty ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND There is a growing demand globally for emergency department (ED) services. An increase in ED visits has resulted in overcrowding and longer wait times. The triage process plays a crucial role in assessing and stratifying patients' risks and ensuring that the critically ill promptly receive appropriate priority and emergency treatment. A substantial amount of research has been conducted on the use of machine learning tools to construct triage and risk prediction models; however, the black box nature of these models has limited their clinical application and interpretation. OBJECTIVE In this study, we plan to develop an innovative, dynamic, and interpretable System for Emergency Risk Triage (SERT) for risk stratification in the ED by leveraging large-scale electronic health records (EHR) and machine learning. METHODS To achieve this objective, we will conduct a retrospective, single-centre study based on a large, longitudinal dataset obtained from the EHR of the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore. Study outcomes include adverse events experienced by patients, such as the need for an intensive care unit, inpatient death, among others. With pre-identified candidate variables drawn from expert opinions and relevant literature, we will apply an interpretable machine learning-based AutoScore to develop three SERT scores. These three scores can be used at different times in the ED, i.e., upon arrival, during the ED stay, and at admission. Furthermore, we will compare our novel SERT scores with established clinical scores and previously described black box machine learning models as baselines. The receiver operating characteristic analysis will be conducted on the testing cohorts for performance evaluation. RESULTS The study is currently being conducted. The extracted data indicate approximately 1.8 million ED visits by over 810,000 unique patients. Modelling results are expected to be published in 2022. CONCLUSIONS The SERT scoring system proposed in this study will be unique and innovative due to its dynamic nature and modelling transparency. If successfully validated, our proposed solution will establish a standard for data processing and modelling by taking advantage of large-scale EHRs and interpretable machine learning tools.



Med ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenz Adlung ◽  
Yotam Cohen ◽  
Uria Mor ◽  
Eran Elinav


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100251
Author(s):  
Ian Scott ◽  
Stacey Carter ◽  
Enrico Coiera

Machine learning algorithms are being used to screen and diagnose disease, prognosticate and predict therapeutic responses. Hundreds of new algorithms are being developed, but whether they improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes remains uncertain. If clinicians are to use algorithms, they need to be reassured that key issues relating to their validity, utility, feasibility, safety and ethical use have been addressed. We propose a checklist of 10 questions that clinicians can ask of those advocating for the use of a particular algorithm, but which do not expect clinicians, as non-experts, to demonstrate mastery over what can be highly complex statistical and computational concepts. The questions are: (1) What is the purpose and context of the algorithm? (2) How good were the data used to train the algorithm? (3) Were there sufficient data to train the algorithm? (4) How well does the algorithm perform? (5) Is the algorithm transferable to new clinical settings? (6) Are the outputs of the algorithm clinically intelligible? (7) How will this algorithm fit into and complement current workflows? (8) Has use of the algorithm been shown to improve patient care and outcomes? (9) Could the algorithm cause patient harm? and (10) Does use of the algorithm raise ethical, legal or social concerns? We provide examples where an algorithm may raise concerns and apply the checklist to a recent review of diagnostic imaging applications. This checklist aims to assist clinicians in assessing algorithm readiness for routine care and identify situations where further refinement and evaluation is required prior to large-scale use.



2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen T. Hansen ◽  
Johanna Moore ◽  
Emily Herding ◽  
Tami Gooch ◽  
Diane Hirigoyen ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubham Debnath ◽  
◽  
Douglas P. Barnaby ◽  
Kevin Coppa ◽  
Alexander Makhnevich ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea F. Dugas ◽  
Howard Burkom ◽  
Anna L. DuVal ◽  
Richard Rothman

We provided emergency department providers with a real-time laboratory-based influenza surveillance tool, and evaluated the utility and acceptability of the surveillance information using provider surveys. The majority of emergency department providers found the surveillance data useful and indicated the additional information impacted their clinical decision making regarding influenza testing and treatment.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document