scholarly journals An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga C Damman ◽  
Ylva KA van den Hengel ◽  
A Jeanne M van Loon ◽  
Jany Rademakers
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mátyás Osváth ◽  
Orsolya Varga ◽  
Karolina Kósa

BACKGROUND Patient experiences constitute an independent dimension of health care quality that can be solicited by structured surveys or at dedicated online platforms. Unsolicited spontaneous patient narratives are much less used but potentially valuable means for gauging patient experiences. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to explore patient experiences in spontaneous patient blogs submitted during one decade to an online health forum. METHODS 1662 non-solicited individual blogs on patient experiences posted between 2009 and 2018 on a Hungarian internet forum were randomly sampled. 20% (n=346) of the blogs were used for qualitative content analysis. A coding framework was constructed based on previous research and taxonomies to analyse content, including specific experiences or episodes. Major categories and subcategories were constructed within the three major dimensions (structure, process, outcome) of Donabedian’s framework for health care quality. RESULTS Majority of blogs described a specific experience (94.2%) in healthcare; almost 40% occurred in tertiary care; 29.5% of the blogs even identified a specific hospital or department. 55.2% of the bloggers were patients themselves, and the majority (92.7%) were dissatisfied with the reported experience. Issues were most frequently related to physicians (65.2%). In terms of Donabedian’s dimensions, problems with human resources dominated “Structure” (74.1%) such as not enough or incompetent staff. Waiting time and access to care (69.19%) comprised the most frequent complaints of material resources within “Structure”. Within “Process”, episodes related to examination (42.86%) accounted for most of the complaints. Outcomes were identified in 60% of the blogs, and deterioration, complication, readmission, or death was reported in 62% of these episodes. CONCLUSIONS Donabedian’s model of healthcare quality was appropriate for the categorization of patient experiences. Regular monitoring of spontaneous patient reports is recommended to utilize them for healthcare quality improvement especially if reports provide specific details.


2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter P Groenewegen ◽  
Jan J Kerssens ◽  
Herman J Sixma ◽  
Ingrid van der Eijk ◽  
Wienke GW Boerma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignatius Bau ◽  
Robert A. Logan ◽  
Christopher Dezii ◽  
Bernard Rosof ◽  
Alicia Fernandez ◽  
...  

The authors of this paper recommend the integration of health care quality improvement measures for health literacy, language access, and cultural competence. The paper also notes the importance of patient-centered and equity-based institutional performance assessments or monitoring systems. The authors support the continued use of specific measures such as assessing organizational system responses to health literacy or the actual availability of needed language access services such as qualified interpreters as part of overall efforts to maintain quality and accountability. Moreover, this paper is informed by previous recommendations from a commissioned paper provided by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) to the Roundtable on Health Literacy of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In the commissioned paper, NCQA explained that health literacy, language access, and cultural competence measures are siloed and need to generate results that enhance patient care improvements. The authors suggest that the integration of health literacy, language access, and cultural competence measures will provide for institutional assessment across multiple dimensions of patient vulnerabilities. With such integration, health care organizations and providers will be able to cultivate the tools needed to identify opportunities for quality improvement as well as adapt care to meet diverse patients’ complex needs. Similarly, this paper reinforces the importance of providing more “measures that matter” within clinical settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 797-797
Author(s):  
Nicholas Reed

Abstract Hearing Loss (HL) is common among older adults and is associated with poor health care quality outcomes include 30-day readmissions, length of stay, poorer satisfaction, and increased medical expenditures. These associations may manifest in changes in help-seeking behaviour. In the 2015 Current Medicare Beneficiary Study (MCBS) (n=10848; weighted sample=46.3 million), participants reported whether they knowingly had avoided seeking care in the past year and self-reported HL was measured as degree of trouble (none, a little, or a lot) hearing when using a hearing aid if applicable. In a model adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and health factors, those with a little trouble (OR= 1.612; 95% CI= 1.334-1.947; P<0.001) and a lot of trouble hearing (OR= 2.011; 95% CI= 1.443-2.801; P<0.001) had 61.2% and 101.1% higher odds of avoiding health care over the past year relative to participants with no trouble hearing. Future work should examine whether hearing care modifies this association.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document