The usage of social media encouraged patients' active participation in medical decision-making: cross-sectional survey (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Yuan Chen ◽  
Yu-Fang Cheng ◽  
Chau-Chung Wu ◽  
Tzong-Shinn Chu

BACKGROUND The rapid advance of information technology since the end of twentieth century has deeply influenced the ways people gather health information to use as references for medical decision-making. Studies have overwhelmingly been focused on the association between health information in the media and the usage of medical care, nevertheless, none of them have examined the association between the usage of social media for gathering health information and patients’ active participation in medical decision-making. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the influence of the health information obtained from social media has on patients’ preference to actively participate in medical decision-making. METHODS The participants in this study were openly recruited from the patients who were admitted to the cardiology inpatient unit in the Department of Internal Medicine with an admission diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We used Control Preference Scale to estimate each patient’s preference to play an active role, a collaborative role, or a passive role in medical decision-making. We conducted multivariate logistic regression for examining the association between “gathering health information from social media” and “playing an active role in medical decision-making”, by including the confounding variables which have an association with the outcome variable with a p value of less than .30. RESULTS A total of 156 patients participated in this study. After adjusting for the confounding variables, patients who gathered health information related to coronary artery disease from social media were more likely to play an active role in medical decision-making (odds ratio = 2.85, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of patients with one-year increment of their age for playing an active role in medical decision-making was decreased approximately by 6.20% (odds ratio = 0.94, p = 0.01), and patients cared for by Physician C preferred to play an active role as compared to other physicians (odds ratio = 5.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Although health information gathered from social media may have been discussed and validated by one’s companions on social media, there is no guarantee that the health information is correct. If the health information gathered from social media is correct, patients’ active participation in medical decision-making is helpful in facilitating physician-patient communication towards that aim. Future studies may be focused on how information seekers use modern information technology to gather correct health information. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

Author(s):  
Ofir Koren ◽  
Saleem Rajab ◽  
Mohammad Barbour ◽  
Moriah Shachar ◽  
Amit Shahar ◽  
...  

Background We intend to examine whether the COVID-19 outbreak influences medical decision-making (MDM) among Non-COVID patients. Method We recruit 287 patients who admit to ER department due to cardiovascular complaints. Anxiety level was measured using three questionnaires (GAD-7, Beck Inventory, and the cardiac anxiety questionnaire). A fourth survey was designed to assess MDM considerations. Results 64% of patients were male (median age 54). Almost half of the patients were found to have moderate to severe levels of anxiety.79.3% of patients reported that the outbreak influenced their MDM. 44.5% of patients sought medical care 2-3 from the onset of symptoms. Coronary artery disease was found in only 26 patients (9.1%). Almost half of the patients stated that they would have gone earlier if not for the current pandemic. Conclusion Non-COVID patients seeking medical care had a high anxiety level that directly affected decision-making and put them at unnecessary risk.


Author(s):  
Jessica Berg

This article explores the ethical and legal issues involved in the use of social media to make end-of-life decisions. After providing an overview of social media such as online forums, virtual worlds, blogs, and social network sites, it considers the many different ways that social media might play a role in medical decision making. It then looks at the current legal framework for surrogate decision making and the concerns arising from the use of social media in such an endeavor. The article concludes by stressing the role of clinicians and ethics committees in helping surrogates navigate the complexities of medical decision making in the Internet age.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document