scholarly journals Pregnancy outcomes of the first thawing cycle in “freeze-all” strategy of infertility patients with fever during oocyte recruitment: A matched–pair study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingmei Lin ◽  
Zi-Ru Niu ◽  
Rong Li

BACKGROUND It is well known that assisted reproduction technology (ART) is currently an effective method for treating infertility. But it is currently unknown whether the patients with fever after control ovulation during egg retrieval could increase risk of pelvic infection or not, and fever itself may be affect oocyte or embryo quantity and quality, thus with poor pregnancy outcomes? But if the oocyte retrieval was cancelled cause of fever, the risk of severe ovulation complications might increase, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome, thrombus and ovarian pedicle torsion. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to analysis the outcomes of the patients with fever during oocyte retrieval after the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. METHODS This is a 1:3 retrospective paired study matched for age. In this study, 58 infertility patients (Group 1) had fever during the control ovulation and the time of the oocyte retrieval within 72 hours, they undertook ovum pick up and whole embryo freezing (“freeze-all” strategy). The control controls (Group 2) are174 patients matched for age with whole embryo freezing for other reasons. The baseline characteristic, clinical data of ovarian stimulation and the outcomes, such as the clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and ongoing clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS There were 58 patients were enrolled in the Group 1, and matched with 174 patients for the Group 2. All the patients had no pelvic inflammatory disease after oocyte retrieval. The basic characteristics of patients refers to age, BMI, nulliparity, basal FSH, basal LH, basal E2 and infertility type (primary or secondary) were with no significantly difference. But the AMH lever (4.2 versus 2.2, P<0.001) were higher and the infertility time (3 versus 2, P=0.035) was longer in the control group. The number of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rate were lower in the group (P< 0.001), but the ovarian stimulation protocol, the usage of Gn both time and dose, the ICSI rate, the 2PN rate, the number of available embryos (D3 and D5), the endometrial thickness, the number of embryo transfer and the type of luteal support supplementation were similar between the two groups. Regarding pregnancy outcomes,the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early spontaneous rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate all were with no significantly difference. CONCLUSIONS The patients with fever during control ovulation and the oocyte retrieval got similar outcomes compared with those with no fever patients when taken the whole embryos freezing. Fever had almost no effect on the quality of embryo and endometrium. Moreover, the oocyte retrieved is relatively safe and reliable under strict disinfection and taken oral antibiotics for prevention infection.

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Huong ◽  
A Ph. Th. Tú ◽  
L H Mai ◽  
N Doã. Thảo ◽  
C A Mạnh

Abstract Study question Is that essential for prolonged culture of thawed blastocysts in order to be fully re-expanded before transferring? Summary answer Ongoing pregnancy rates decreased in blastocysts that not fully re-expanded after thawing. What is known already: The thaw survival of blastocysts is examined based on morphology of inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE). However, thawed blastocysts experience multiple changes in morphology and might be collapse after thawing due to the presence of blastocoel cavity. It is then difficult to evaluate blastocyst quality. Therefore, the blastocyst re-expansion is considered as a criteria to assess quickly the competent embryos. It also reflects the status energy metabolism from high quality embryo. After all, there are still some controversial opinions about the influence of re-expansion status after thawing. Study design, size, duration This was a retrospective study based on data collected between October 2019 and December 2020. A total 528 thawed blastocysts which were divided into two groups according to the post-thaw reexpansion status: fully re-expanded blastocysts (n = 416), partial or no re-expanded blastocysts (n = 112). The re-expansion status of blastocyst was assess prior to loading on the catheter by senior embryologists. Participants/materials, setting, methods Primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy. Only frozen single D5 transfer cycles were included. We excluded the frozen sperm/oocytes/embryos donation cycles, missing data, non-intact embryos after thawing. Statistical analyses were performed with T or chi-squared tests. Multivariable regression analysis was performed adjusting for the following confounding factors: age, BMI, embryo quality, re-expansion status, biopsied blastocyst. Main results and the role of chance Female age, BMI, number of previous cycles, endometrial thickness, positive HCG results, clinical pregnancy rate were comparable among patients within two groups. The rate of ongoing pregnancy rate in group 1 was significant higher compared with group 2 (51 vs 40.2, p &lt; 0.05). The number of good quality blastocyst transferred in group 1 was higher than in group 2 (p &lt; 0.001). However, under the same embryo quality, there were no difference between clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate between two groups. When logistic regression were performed: only embryo quality, but not the re-expansion status, was noted to be an independent predictor of ongoing pregnancy (OR = 3.53;95% CI; 1.734–7.184;p=0.001). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design. Wider implications of the findings: Clinical outcomes are comparable between re-expanded blastocyst and partial or no re-expanded blastocysts, although ongoing pregnancy can be improved when embryos are fully expanded. As expected, blastocysts quality has the most important impact on ongoing pregnancy rate. Trial registration number Not applicable


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyuan Song ◽  
Tingting Liao ◽  
Liu Jiang ◽  
Houming Su ◽  
Licheng Ji ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To explore the effect of different concentrations of peak serum estradiol levels on endometrial receptivity quantitatively. Methods In our reproductive medicine center, two best quality of day 3 (D3) embryos were transferred or frozen according to E 2 and progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and the number of oocytes retrieved. The remaining embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage and frozen. The patients were then categorized into three groups. The patients with frozen-thawed D3 embryo transfer in artificial cycles without blastocyst frozen served as group 1, those with fresh D3 embryo transfer without blastocyst frozen as group 2, and those with fresh D3 embryo transfer with blastocyst frozen as group 3. Each group was further stratified into 4 sub-groups according to E 2 levels on the day of hCG administration. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and abortion rate of frozen-thawed and fresh D3 embryo transfer were compared among the three groups in the same stratified E 2 levels. Results For E 2 <7,000 pg/mL, group 1 and group 2 had similar clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate. But for E 2 ≥7,000 pg/mL, the clinical pregnancy rate in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (p<0.05). For E 2 <7,000 pg/mL, pregnancy rate and implantation rate in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 3 (P<0.05). But for E 2 ≥7,000 pg/mL, the pregnancy rate in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 3 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the abortion rate between group 1 and group 2, or between group 1 and group 3. Conclusions High serum E 2 concentration does not impair implantation and pregnancy rates unless exceeding a certain limit (e.g. 7,000 pg/mL) on the day of hCG administration. Since peak E 2 level was related to OHSS and adverse pregnancy outcomes, further study is needed to set a threshold peak E 2 level for fresh embryo transfer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4399
Author(s):  
Federica Barbagallo ◽  
Aldo E. Calogero ◽  
Rosita A. Condorelli ◽  
Ashraf Farrag ◽  
Emmanuele A. Jannini ◽  
...  

In recent years, a growing number of studies seem to support the beneficial effects of a very short abstinence period on sperm parameters, especially in patients with oligo-asthenozoospermia (OA). On this basis, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a short period of abstinence (1 h) on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in infertile patients with severe OA. We performed a retrospective study on 313 ICSI cycles in which couples were divided into two different groups based on sperm parameters of the male partners. Group 1 included normozoospermic men or male partners with a mild OA (n = 223). Group 2 included male partners with severe OA (n = 90). They were asked to provide a second consecutive ejaculation after 1 h from the first one. The best ejaculate was used to perform ICSI. We found a significant increase of total (p < 0.001) and progressive motility (p < 0.001) in the second ejaculate of patients of Group 2 compared with those of the first one. Spermatozoa of the second ejaculate were chosen for ICSI for all patients in Group 2. We found statistically significant improvement of clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.001) and embryo quality (p = 0.003) in couples in Group 2 compared to those of Group 1. No statistically significant difference was found in fertilization, implantation, live birth delivery, and miscarriage rates between the two groups. Therefore, a second semen sample collected after a very short time-interval in patients with severe OA allowed us to obtain significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate with improved embryo quality compared to normozoospermic men or patients with mild OA. Fertilization, implantation, live birth delivery, and miscarriage rates were similar between the two groups. The present study shows that a second consecutive ejaculate could represent a simple strategy to obtain better sperm parameters and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in infertile patients with mild-severe OA.


Author(s):  
Mervat A. Elsersy

Background: Unexplained infertility is diagnosed when the basic infertility workup is found to be normal. The objective was to compare between the results of IUI performance at 24 hours or 36 hours after hCG injection in couples with unexplained infertility.Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 250 patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility who were randomly allocated in two equal groups. Each patient received ovulation induction. Follicular growth scanning was performed, patients received 10.000 hCG injection when there was mature follicle equaled to or more than 18mm. Then they randomly allocated to either group 1 who underwent IUI 24 hours after hCG injection or group 2 who underwent IUI 36 hours after hCG injection.Results: The positive qualitative serum β -hCG test was higher in group 1 who received IUI  24 hours after hGC injection, 24%, while in group 2 who received IUI  36 hours after hGC injection, it was 16.8% but no statistical differences between the two studied groups  could be observed. The most important finding in this study is that the clinical pregnancy rate in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2.Conclusions: Earlier IUI procedures increased the clinical pregnancy rate in patients with unexplained infertility during ovulation induction with gonadotropins. Correct timing of insemination is essential.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Álvarez ◽  
Sofía Gaggiotti-Marre ◽  
Francisca Martínez ◽  
Lluc Coll ◽  
Sandra García ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does an individualised luteal phase support (iLPS), according to serum progesterone (P4) level the day prior to euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET), improve pregnancy outcomes when started on the day previous to embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER Patients with low serum P4 the day prior to euploid FET can benefit from the addition of daily subcutaneous P4 injections (Psc), when started the day prior to FET, and achieve similar reproductive outcomes compared to those with initial adequate P4 levels. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The ratio between FET/IVF has spectacularly increased in the last years mainly thanks to the pursuit of an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome free clinic and the development of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). There is currently a big concern regarding the endometrial preparation for FET, especially in relation to serum P4 levels around the time of embryo transfer. Several studies have described impaired pregnancy outcomes in those patients with low P4 levels around the time of FET, considering 10 ng/ml as one of the most accepted reference values. To date, no prospective study has been designed to compare the reproductive outcomes between patients with adequate P4 the day previous to euploid FET and those with low, but restored P4 levels on the transfer day after iLPS through daily Psc started on the day previous to FET. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective observational study was conducted at a university-affiliated fertility centre between November 2018 and January 2020 in patients undergoing PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) IVF cycles and a subsequent FET under hormone replacement treatment (HRT). A total of 574 cycles (453 patients) were analysed: 348 cycles (leading to 342 euploid FET) with adequate P4 on the day previous to FET, and 226 cycles (leading to 220 euploid FET) under iLPS after low P4 on the previous day to FET, but restored P4 levels on the transfer day. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Overall we included 574 HRT FET cycles (453 patients). Standard HRT was used for endometrial preparation. P4 levels were measured the day previous to euploid FET. P4 &gt; 10.6 ng/ml was considered as adequate and euploid FET was performed on the following day (FET Group 1). P4 &lt; 10.6 ng/ml was considered as low, iLPS was added in the form of daily Psc injections, and a new P4 analysis was performed on the following day. FET was only performed on the same day when a restored P4 &gt; 10.6 ng/ml was achieved (98.2% of cases) (FET Group 2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Patient’s demographics and cycle parameters were comparable between both euploid FET groups (FET Group 1 and FET Group 2) in terms of age, weight, oestradiol and P4 levels and number of embryos transferred. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (56.4% vs 59.1%: rate difference (RD) −2.7%, 95% CI [−11.4; 6.0]), ongoing pregnancy rate (49.4% vs 53.6%: RD −4.2%, 95% CI [−13.1; 4.7]) or live birth rate (49.1% vs 52.3%: RD −3.2%, 95% CI [−12; 5.7]). No significant differences were also found according to miscarriage rate (12.4% vs 9.2%: RD 3.2%, 95% CI [−4.3; 10.7]). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only iLPS through daily Psc was evaluated. The time for Psc injection was not stated and no serum P4 determinations were performed once the pregnancy was achieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study provides information regarding an ‘opportunity window’ for improved ongoing pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates through a daily Psc injection in cases of inadequate P4 levels the day previous to FET (P4 &lt; 10.6 ng/ml) and restored values the day of FET (P4 &gt; 10.6 ng/ml). Only euploid FET under HRT were considered, avoiding one of the main reasons of miscarriage and implantation failure and overcoming confounding factors such as female age, embryo quality or ovarian stimulation protocols. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received. B.C. reports personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, IBSA and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. N.P. reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Theramex and Besins International and personal fees from IBSA and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03740568.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Banerjee ◽  
B Singla

Abstract Study question To assess the role of subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in thin endometrium cases. Summary answer G CSF has beneficial role to improve the endometrium thickness in thin endometrium. What is known already Endometrium is very important for embryo implantation and the endometrial thickness is the marker of receptivity of the endometrium. Study design, size, duration Study design - Retrospective analysis Size - 88 infertile females with thin endometrium (&lt; 7 mm) in the age group of 23 to 40 years Duration - one year. Participants/materials, setting, methods In the group 1 of 44 females, subcutaneous infusion of G CSF (300 mcg/ml) was added along with other supplements and if lining was not more than 7 mm in 72 hours, then second infusion was given. In the group 2 of 44 females, only estradiol valerate and sildenafil were given.The efficacy of G CSF was evaluated by assessing the endometrium thickness before embryo transfer, pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates. Main results and the role of chance There was no difference between the two groups regarding demographic variables, egg reserve, sperm parameters, number of embryos transferred and embryo quality. . The pregnancy rate was 60% (24 out of 40 cases) in the group 1 that was significantly higher than in-group 2 that was 31% (9 out of 29 cases) with p value &lt; 0.0001. The clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher in-group 1 (55%) as compared to group 2 (24%) with p value &lt; 0.0001. Limitations, reasons for caution Further larger cohort studies are required to explore the subcutaneous role of G CSF in thin endometrium. Wider implications of the findings: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has beneficial role to improve the endometrium thickness in thin endometrium. In most of previous studies, the intrauterine infusion of G CSF was given to improve the uterine lining. This is one of the few studies done that showed subcutaneous role of G CSF in thin endometrium. Trial registration number Not applicable


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Dong ◽  
Y Jia ◽  
Y Sha ◽  
L Diao ◽  
S Cai ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question To evaluate whether the pregnancy outcomes could be improved in implantation failure patients by endometrial receptivity array, endometrial immune profiling, or a combination of both. Summary answer There was no statistical difference between different endometrial receptivity evaluation and treatment in improving the clinical pregnancy rate. What is known already Both endometrial receptivity array and endometrial immune profiling were promised to improve the endometrial receptivity and subsequent clinical pregnancy. However, less is known about the efficiency between each other and whether the combination could further enhance their clinical value. Study design, size, duration Between November 2019 and September 2020, 143 women with a history of at least two or more consecutive implantation failure in IVF/ICSI treatment in Chengdu Xinan Gynecology Hospital were included. They were divided into three groups: ‘ERA + Immune Profiling’ (n = 70), ‘Immune Profiling’ (n = 41), and ‘ERA’ (n = 32). Participants/materials, setting, methods Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 38, with normal uterus and uterine cavity. All patients were suggested to evaluate endometrial receptivity by ERA test (Igenomix, Valencia, Spain) and endometrial immune profiling based on immunohistochemistry simultaneously, who would be free to choose each or both evaluation approaches. Personal Embryo Transfer and/or personal medical care were adopted according to evaluation results. Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by gestational sacs observed under ultrasonography. Main results and the role of chance The overall prevalence of displaced window of implantation (WOI) is 84.3%, and nearly 74.8% (83/111) patients were diagnosed as endometrial immune dysregulation. Clinical Pregnancy rate and embryonic implantation rate decreased in the ‘Immune Test’ groups, but without a statistical difference (P = 0.311, and 0.158, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that different endometrial receptivity evaluation and treatment was not associated the clinical pregnancy rate, suggesting the performance of different endometrial receptivity evaluation and treatment is similar in improving the clinical pregnancy rate. Neither the immune profiling (CD56, P = 0.591; FOXP3, P = 0.195; CD68, P = 0.820; CD163, P = 0.926; CD1a, P = 0.561; CD57, P = 0.221; CD8, P = 0.427; CD138 CE, P = 0.372) nor histologic endometrial dating defined by Noyes criteria (P = 0.374) were associated with ERA phases. Limitations, reasons for caution Although the selection of evaluation approaches was based on patients’ willingness, the variances of baseline characteristics and immune profiling existed in different groups. The immunological treatment efficacy based on immune profiling was not evaluated before embryo transfer. Wider implications of the findings: To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the pregnancy outcomes after two typical endometrial receptivity evaluation approaches. The findings highlight the unsubstitutability for each assessment, indicating that both asynchronous and pathological WOI contribute to implantation failure. Trial registration number X2019004


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1889-1899
Author(s):  
Carlos Hernandez-Nieto ◽  
Joseph A Lee ◽  
Tamar Alkon-Meadows ◽  
Martha Luna-Rojas ◽  
Tanmoy Mukherjee ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the impact of a late follicular phase progesterone elevation (LFPE) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on embryonic competence and reproductive potential in thaw cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) screened embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER Our study findings suggest that LFPE, utilizing a progesterone cutoff value of 2.0 ng/ml, is neither associated with impaired embryonic development, increased rate of embryonic aneuploidy, nor compromised implantation and pregnancy outcomes following a euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Premature progesterone elevation during COH has been associated with lower pregnancy rates due to altered endometrial receptivity in fresh IVF cycles. Also, increased levels of progesterone (P) have been suggested to be a marker for ovarian dysfunction, with some evidence to show an association between LFPE and suboptimal embryonic development. However, the effect of LFPE on embryonic competence is still controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort analysis in a single, academic ART center from September 2016 to March 2020. In total, 5244 COH cycles for IVF/PGT-A were analyzed, of those 5141 were included in the analysis. A total of 23 991 blastocysts underwent trophectoderm biopsy and PGT analysis. Additionally, the clinical IVF outcomes of 5806 single euploid FET cycles were evaluated. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Cohorts were separated in two groups: Group 1: oocytes retrieved from cycles with normal P levels during ovulation trigger (P ≤ 2.0 ng/ml); Group 2: oocytes retrieved after cycles in which LFPE was noted (P &gt; 2.0 ng/ml). Extended culture and PGT-A was performed. Secondly, IVF outcomes after a single euploid FET were evaluated for each cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Four thousand nine hundred and twenty-five cycles in Group 1 were compared with 216 cycles on Group 2. Oocyte maturity rates, fertilization rates and blastulation rates were comparable among groups. A 65.3% (n = 22 654) rate of utilizable blastocysts was found in patients with normal P levels and were comparable to the 62.4% (n = 1337) observed in those with LFPE (P = 0.19). The euploidy rates were 52.8% (n = 11 964) and 53.4% (n = 714), respectively, albeit this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.81). Our multivariate analysis was fitted with a generalized estimating equation (GEE) and no association was found with LFPE and an increased odds of embryo aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio 1.04 95% CI 0.86–1.27, P = 0.62). A sub-analysis of subsequent 5806 euploid FET cycles (normal P: n = 5617 cycles and elevated P: n = 189 cycles) showed no differences among groups in patient’s BMI, Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), endometrial thickness at FET and number of prior IVF cycles. However, a significant difference was found in patient’s age and oocyte age. The number of good quality embryos transferred, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy loss rates were comparable among groups. Of the registered live births (normal P group: n = 2198; elevated P group: n = 52), there were no significant differences in gestational age weeks (39.0 ± 1.89 versus 39.24 ± 1.53, P = 0.25) and birth weight (3317 ± 571.9 versus 3 266 ± 455.8 g, P = 0.26) at delivery, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The retrospective nature of the study and probable variability in the study center’s laboratory protocol(s), selected progesterone cutoff value and progesterone assay techniques compared to other ART centers may limit the external validity of our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Based on robust sequencing data from a large cohort of embryos, we conclude that premature P elevation during IVF stimulation does not predict embryonic competence. Our study results show that LFPE is neither associated with impaired embryonic development nor increased rates of aneuploidy. Embryos obtained from cycles with LFPE can be selected for transfer, and patients can be reassured that the odds of achieving a healthy pregnancy are similar to the embryos exposed during COH cycles to physiologically normal P levels. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was received for the realization of this study. Dr A.B.C. is advisor and/or board member of Sema 4 (Stakeholder in data), Progyny and Celmatix. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danjun Li ◽  
Shuzin Khor ◽  
Jialyu Huang ◽  
Qiuju Chen ◽  
Qifeng Lyu ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effect of mild stimulation with letrozole on pregnancy outcomes in ovulatory women undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to natural cycle.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingTertiary care academic medical center.PopulationA total of 6,874 infertile women with regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days) met the criteria for this study in the period from 2013 to 2020.MethodsAll patients who were prepared for and underwent FET were divided into two groups: a modified natural cycle (NC) group (n=3,958) and a letrozole cycle group (n=2,916).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome of the study was clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcome measures were endometrial thickness, rates of implantation, positive HCG test, live birth, early miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy.ResultsThe clinical pregnancy rate was not statistically different between the modified NC-FET group and the letrozole-FFT group before (crude OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09, P=0.902&gt;0.05) and after propensity score matching (PSM) (crude OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.12, P=0.870&gt;0.05). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate remained insignificant before (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10, P=0.979&gt;0.05) and after matching (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.11, P=0.936&gt;0.05), respectively. Similarly, in the crude and adjusted analysis, the positive HCG test, implantation, live birth and early miscarriage rates were also comparable in the letrozole-FFT group and modified NC-FET group before and after matching. Furthermore, the endometrial thickness of letrozole-FFT group was similar to that of modified NC-FET group with adjusted analysis.ConclusionOur observation suggests that mild stimulation with letrozole could produce similar pregnancy outcomes in ovulatory patients who undergo FET when compared with a natural cycle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document