Effects on Brain Correlates and Psychological Functioning of a Mobile Application (BackFit App) Based on Education and Therapeutic Exercise among Patients with Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Non-randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Sitges ◽  
Juan Lorenzo Terrasa ◽  
Nuria García-Dopico ◽  
Joan Segur-Ferrer ◽  
Olga Velasco-Roldán ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Low back pain is the main cause of disability in industrialized countries, causing suffering of patients and public health expenditure in care and labor concepts. However, current interventions are inadequate because are often based on a biomedical model. To improve the efficacy of current interventions in chronic low back pain (CLBP) it is necessary to apply knowledge about brain mechanisms involved in pain processing and increase evidence about innovative mobile health applications. OBJECTIVE To investigate if a self-managed program based on education and therapeutic exercise using a mobile application (“BackFit App”), compared to a face-to-face supervised program, produces changes in brain and heart activity, pain and disability, pain sensitivity, psychological and cognitive functioning. METHODS A 2-arm parallel non-randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty patients with non-specific CLBP participated in an educational and exercise-based 4-weeks intervention. They were assigned to a self-managed (using BackFit App) (n=23, mean 45.00 [SD 9.13] years, 10 males) or a face-to-face intervention group (n=27, mean 48.63 [SD 7.54] years, 7 males). All measures were assessed at the Research Institute of Health Sciences (IUNICS) located at University of Balearic Islands (Palma, Spain). Primary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) (at rest and during a modified version of the Eriksen Flanker Task) and electrocardiographic (ECG) activity (at rest). Secondary outcomes were pressure pain thresholds and pressure pain intensity ratings, psychological functioning (mood, anxiety, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs) and cognitive performance (percentage of hits, reaction times). RESULTS Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, anthropometrics, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pain duration, handedness and anxiety (all P>.05). Frequency analysis of EEG resting-state data showed increased beta-2 (.0020 vs .0024, P = .027) and beta-3 (.0013 vs .0018, P = .035) after the intervention. Source analyses also revealed significant higher power density of beta (16-30 Hz) at anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) after the intervention, but additionally higher power density of alpha (8-12 Hz) at postcentral gyrus and lower power density of delta (2-4 Hz) at cuneus and precuneus (all P<.05). Both groups also improved depression (7.74 vs 5,15, P=.012), kinesiophobia (22.91 vs 20.87, P=.002) (and activity avoidance (14.49 vs 12.86, P<.001)), helplessness (6.38 vs 4.74, P=.027), fear avoidance beliefs (35 vs 29.11, P=.031) (and avoidance to physical activity (12.07 vs 9.28, P=.011)), but increased disability (6.08 vs 7.5, P=.014), scores after the intervention. No significant differences between groups nor sessions were found in ECG resting-state data, EEG data during the Flanker Task, cognitive performance nor pain sensitivity (all P>.05). CONCLUSIONS Both intervention modalities increased beta activity at rest, mainly located at ACC, and improved psychological functioning. Future studies that consider longer duration and individualization of the intervention program, and that include CLBP patients with greater pain and disability baselines should be conducted. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04576611.

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Fernando de Oliveira ◽  
Richard Eloin Liebano ◽  
Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa ◽  
Lívia Leticia Rissato ◽  
Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa

Background Manual therapists typically advocate the need for a detailed clinical examination to decide which vertebral level should be manipulated in patients with low back pain. However, it is unclear whether spinal manipulation needs to be specific to a vertebral level. Objective The purpose of this study was to analyze the immediate effects of a single, region-specific spinal manipulation defined during the clinical examination versus a single non–region-specific spinal manipulation (applied on an upper thoracic vertebra) in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain for the outcome measures of pain intensity and pressure pain threshold at the time of the assessment. Design This was a 2-arm, prospectively registered, randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Setting The study was conducted in an outpatient physical therapy clinic in Brazil. Patients The study participants were 148 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (with pain duration of at least 12 weeks). Randomization The randomization schedule was generated by an independent statistician and was concealed by using consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Interventions A single high-velocity manipulation was administered to the upper thoracic region of the participants allocated to the non–region-specific manipulation group and to the painful lumbar levels of the participants allocated to the region-specific manipulation group. Measurements Pain intensity was measured by a 0 to 10 numeric pain rating scale. Pressure pain threshold was measured using a pressure algometer. Limitations It was not possible to blind the therapist and participants. Results A total of 148 patients participated in the study (74 in each group). There was no loss to follow-up. Both groups improved in terms of immediate decrease of pain intensity; however, no between-group differences were observed. The between-group difference for pain intensity and pressure pain threshold were 0.50 points (95% confidence interval=−0.10 to 1.10) and −1.78 points (95% confidence interval=−6.40 to 2.82), respectively. No adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion The immediate changes in pain intensity and pressure pain threshold after a single high-velocity manipulation do not differ by region-specific versus non–region-specific manipulation techniques in patients with chronic low back pain.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarmo Rantonen ◽  
Aki Vehtari ◽  
Jaro Karppinen ◽  
Satu Luoto ◽  
Eira Viikari-Juntura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 109980042110448
Author(s):  
Vajihe Ghavipanje ◽  
Nasser Mohammad Rahimi ◽  
Farideh Akhlaghi

Background: The worldwide prevalence of obesity and low back pain (LBP) has recently dramatically increased and is mainly indicated among postpartum women, leading to a range of adverse health consequences. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of 6 weeks of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization training (DNS) in obese postpartum women with LBP. Method: This was a pretest-posttest study design. The study was conducted with 40 obese postpartum women with LBP randomized to receive DNS ( n = 20) or General Exercise (GE, n = 20) 6 times a week for 6 weeks. The data were gathered before and after the 6-week intervention. Results: Forty participants completed the study (mean ± SD, age 29.30 ± 3.77 years; weight 88.10 ± 6.09 kg; height 165.40 ± 6.31 cm; and BMI, 32.19 ± 1.07 kg/m2). The overall group-by-time interaction was significant for Numeric Pain-Rating Scale, Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Inspiration and Expiration Breath Hold Time, and Respiratory Rate outcomes. The global rating of change was significantly different between groups ( p < .05). The rate of improvement was higher in the DNS group compared to the GE group in all 6 tests. Conclusion: The present study confirms that DNS is applicable in obese postpartum women with LBP and effectively improved NPRS, MODQ, FABQ, BHT, and RR. It is clinically suggested that DNS is imperative based on ideal ontogenetic patterns to attain optimal results for obese postpartum women with LBP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document