scholarly journals The Effects of Virtual Reality Treatment on Prefrontal Cortex Activity in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder: Participatory and Interactive Virtual Reality Treatment Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hojun Lee ◽  
JongKwan Choi ◽  
Dooyoung Jung ◽  
Ji-Won Hur ◽  
Chul-Hyun Cho

BACKGROUND Attempts to use virtual reality (VR) as a treatment for various psychiatric disorders have been made recently, and many researchers have identified the effects of VR in psychiatric disorders. Studies have reported that VR therapy is effective in social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, there is no prior study on the neural correlates of VR therapy in patients with SAD. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to find the neural correlates of VR therapy by evaluating the treatment effectiveness of VR in patients with SAD using portable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). METHODS Patients with SAD (n=28) were provided with 6 sessions of VR treatment that was developed for exposure to social situations with a recording system of each participant’s self-introduction in VR. After each VR treatment session, the first-person view (video 1) and third-person view (video 2) clips of the participant’s self-introduction were automatically generated. The functional activities of prefrontal regions were measured by fNIRS while watching videos 1 and 2 with a cognitive task, before and after whole VR treatment sessions, and after the first session of VR treatment. We compared the data of fNIRS between patients with SAD and healthy controls (HCs; n=27). RESULTS We found that reduction in activities of the right frontopolar prefrontal cortex (FPPFC) in HCs was greater than in the SAD group at baseline (<i>t</i>=–2.01, <i>P</i>=.049). Comparing the frontal cortex activation before and after VR treatment sessions in the SAD group showed significant differences in activities of the FPPFC (right: <i>t</i>=–2.93, <i>P</i><.001; left: <i>t</i>=–2.25, <i>P</i>=.03) and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) (right: <i>t</i>=–2.10, <i>P</i>=.045; left: <i>t</i>=–2.21, <i>P</i>=.04) while watching video 2. CONCLUSIONS Activities of the FPPFC and OFC were associated with symptom reduction after VR treatment for SAD. Our study findings might provide a clue to understanding the mechanisms underlying VR treatment for SAD. CLINICALTRIAL Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0003854; https://tinyurl.com/559jp2kp

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 915
Author(s):  
Hyu Seok Jeong ◽  
Jee Hyun Lee ◽  
Hesun Erin Kim ◽  
Jae-Jin Kim

Virtual reality (VR) was introduced to maximize the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) by efficiently performing exposure therapy. The purpose of this study was to find out whether VR-based individual CBT with relatively few treatment sessions is effective in improving social anxiety disorder (SAD). This therapy was applied to 115 patients with SAD who were retrospectively classified into 43 patients who completed the nine or 10 sessions normally (normal termination group), 52 patients who finished the sessions early (early termination group), and 20 patients who had extended the sessions (session extension group). The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE) scores tended to decrease in all groups as the session progressed, and the slope of decrease was the steepest in the early termination group and the least steep in the session extension group. Severity of social anxiety in the last session and symptom reduction rate showed no significant group difference. Our findings suggest that short-term VR-based individual CBT of nine to 10 sessions may be effective. When the therapeutic effect is insufficient during this period, the additional benefit may be minimal if the session is simply extended. The improvement in the early termination group suggests that even shorter sessions of five or six can also be effective.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 825-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle E. Parrish ◽  
Holly K. Oxhandler ◽  
Jacuelynn F. Duron ◽  
Paul Swank ◽  
Patrick Bordnick

Author(s):  
Carlos Ramos-Galarza ◽  
Pamela Acosta-Rodas ◽  
Jaime Moscoso-Salazar ◽  
Omar Condor-Herrera ◽  
Jorge Cruz-Cárdenas

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gaebler ◽  
Judith Daniels ◽  
Jan-Peter Lamke ◽  
Thomas Fydrich ◽  
Henrik Walter

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0128608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Boehme ◽  
Viktoria Ritter ◽  
Susan Tefikow ◽  
Ulrich Stangier ◽  
Bernhard Strauss ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document