scholarly journals SEDIMENT EROSION AND DEPOSITION IN THE FORMER ARASE DAM RESERVOIR UNDER THE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Author(s):  
Kazuaki OHTSUKI ◽  
Hiroki IYOOKA ◽  
Yasuo NIHEI ◽  
Yusuke YOSHIMORI ◽  
Shunsuke NAKAMURA ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Egashira ◽  

The annual number of deaths resulting from landslides and debris flow in Japan over the past 40 years has shown a decreasing tendency as corresponding countermeasures are implemented. The countermeasures constituted of structural and non-structural methods are introduced, focusing on their phenomenological function to clear up roles of sediment research on them. In addition, governing equations which are employed currently in numerical predictions are shown, including formulas for bed shear stress and sediment erosion and deposition in order to illustrate differences between the flow of water and sediment mixture in steep areas and the flow of usually observed floods in rivers. It is recommended that equations which are able to distinguish rapid changes of flow characteristics due to internal solid type friction, sediment erosion and deposition and the corresponding changes of bed elevation should be applied in the numerical computations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 2537-2540
Author(s):  
Hua Ge ◽  
Ling Ling Zhu ◽  
Xi Bing Zhang

The influence of particles characteristics, flow conditions, and composition of riverbed on non-uniform particles pick-up and settling were firstly analyzed in this paper, followed by summaries of the erosion and deposition characteristics and the simple analysis of its inherent mechanism.


2020 ◽  
Vol 538 ◽  
pp. 116198
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Ruetenik ◽  
Ken L. Ferrier ◽  
Jessica R. Creveling ◽  
Matthew Fox

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (sp1) ◽  
pp. 236-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen K. Mussman ◽  
Darlene Zabowski ◽  
Steven A. Acker

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navid Kimiaghalam ◽  
Masoud Goharrokhi ◽  
Shawn P. Clark

Sediment erosion and deposition rates are two of the most important factors that influence fluvial geomorphology. Several experimental devices have been constructed to estimate cohesive sediment erosion rate. However, estimated erosion rates may not be reliable for large rivers due to limited soil sampling and a high dependency of cohesive sediment behaviour on several physical, mechanical, and electrochemical properties of the sediment and eroding fluid. A new methodology has been developed to estimate the erosion and deposition rate of wide rivers using in situ measurements. To test this methodology, an acoustic Doppler current profiler was used to collect bathymetry and velocity profiles over a study area along the Red River in Winnipeg, Canada. Sediment concentration profiles along an 8.5 km reach of the river were measured several times under different flow conditions. Finally, an advection–dispersion equation was numerically solved using measured and calculated streamwise dispersion coefficients, flow and channel characteristics to calculate net erosion and deposition over the study area. Moreover, an exponential relationship was obtained between the river discharge and longitudinal dispersion coefficient for the Red River.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Zach Hilgendorf ◽  
M. Colin Marvin ◽  
Craig M. Turner ◽  
Ian J. Walker

Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) provide an effective method to examine geomorphic and vegetation change in restored coastal dune ecosystems. Coupling structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry with RGB orthomosaic imagery allows researchers to characterize spatial-temporal geomorphic responses associated with differences in vegetation cover. Such approaches provide quantitative data on landscape morphodynamics and sediment erosion and deposition responses that allow scientists and land managers to assess the efficacy of dynamic restoration efforts and, in turn, make informed decisions for future restoration projects. Two different restored coastal foredune sites in Humboldt County, California were monitored between 2016–20 with UAS (quadcopter and fixed-wing), kite aerial photogrammetry (KAP), and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) platforms. We compared our KAP- and UAS-SfM elevation models to concurrently collected TLS bare earth models for five of our fifteen collections. The goal of this study was to inform on the potential of a multi-platform aerial approach for calculating geomorphic differences (i.e., topographic differencing), in order to quantify sediment erosion and deposition, and vegetation change over a coastal dune ecosystem. While UAS-SfM datasets were relatively well fit to their TLS counterparts (2.1–12.2% area of difference), the KAP-SfM surfaces exhibited higher deviations (23.6–27.6%) and suffered from systematic collection inconsistencies related to methods and susceptibility to external factors (e.g., the influence of wind speed and direction on variable altitude, image overlap, and coverage extent). Finally, we provide commentary on the logistical considerations regarding KAP and UAS data collection and the construction of uncertainty budgets for geomorphic change detection (GCD), while providing suggestions for standardizing methods for uncertainty budgeting. While we propose an approach that incorporates multiple levels of collection- and processing-based uncertainty, we also recognize that uncertainty is often project-specific and outline the development of potential standards for incorporating uncertainty budgets in SfM projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document