Radiology Trainees' Perceptions of Speaking up Culture Related to Safety and Unprofessional Behavior in Their Work Environments

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Donna Luff ◽  
Melissa O'Donnell ◽  
Patrick R. Johnston ◽  
William Martinez ◽  
Priscilla Slanetz ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11013-11013
Author(s):  
Linda Hong ◽  
Lisa Rubinsak ◽  
Michelle F. Benoit ◽  
Deanna Gek Koon Teoh ◽  
Yevgenia Ioffe ◽  
...  

11013 Background: A high prevalence of gender discrimination and harassment has been described among gynecologic oncologists (GOs). This study examined the work environment for women GOs and delineated the perpetrators of negative behaviors. Methods: An internet-based, IRB exempt survey of members of a 472-member Facebook group “Women of Gynecologic Oncology (WGO)” was conducted. Using REDcap survey platform, members provided demographics, practice infrastructure, personal experience with workplace bullying, gender discrimination, microaggressions, and outcomes. Demographic, practice and work environments and perpetrators of negative behaviors were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Between 7/20 and 8/19/2020, 250 (53%) of active WGO members participated in this survey. Most respondents were younger than 50 years old (93.6%); white (82.2%) and non-Hispanic (94.3%). A majority were married (84.7%) with children (75.2%). Practice environments included academic (152, 61.0%), private practice (31, 12.4%), and hospital employed (57, 22.9%). 89.9% supervised trainees. 130 (52.0%) respondents reported bullying, 140 (56.0%) gender discrimination, and 83% having experienced gender-based microaggressions. Age, race, ethnicity, practice setting, division director or chair gender or department reporting structure were not significantly associated with these experiences. Perpetrators of bullying, gender discrimination, and microaggressions were widely distributed (Table). Of those reporting bullying, 61 (46.6%) reported a male perpetrator, 25 (19.1%) female and 45 (34.4%) an equal gender distribution; of those reporting discrimination 105 (74.5%) reported a male perpetrator, 9 (6.4%) female and 27 (19.1%) an equal gender distribution. 32.9% of survey respondents acknowledged having been written up for speaking up in a way that would have been tolerated from a male colleague. 18.3% of respondents have changed jobs because of bullying; 13.5% because of discrimination. Conclusions: Women GOs report high rates of workplace bullying, gender discrimination, and microaggressions regardless of practice setting that often impact their careers. Perpetrators of these behaviors are multiple and varied. Proactive and deliberate interventions to improve the work environments for women GOs are urgently needed.[Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Kesselheim ◽  
Julia T. Shelburne ◽  
Sigall K. Bell ◽  
Jason M. Etchegaray ◽  
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cynda Hylton Rushton

Restoring integrity involves strategies aimed at heeding the call of conscience, giving voice to moral adversity, and speaking up with clarity and confidence. Strategies to respond to moral adversity by leveraging properly bounded moral courage, acknowledging limitations, and connecting to meaning and purpose can help clinicians to respond to imperiled integrity. Skills and practices of moral repair based on Reich’s three phases of suffering offer clinicians a path of healing to repair or mitigate the consequences of moral adversity and suffering. The phases are voiceless suffering, expressive repair including narrative repair, and liberation. When clinicians are able to combine personal practices aimed at restoring their integrity with enabling and supportive work environments, transformation is possible.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
Sharon Mankey ◽  
Mariesa Rang
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gazi Islam ◽  
Michael J. Zyphur ◽  
L. Paul Lewis
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Cecilia E. Ford
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Osmond

This paper examines the electoral and ideological contest that has taken place between Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru in the five National Assembly elections that have been held between 1999 and 2016. Both parties have found success when they have managed to combine effective leadership with a coherent programme and a strong sense of Welsh identity. However, the Welsh vote to leave the EU in the June 2016 referendum has dealt both parties a poor hand in speaking up for Welsh interests. Can they find a common cause in working together and also with Scotland to take Wales forward in a progressive constitutional direction?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document