Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Point—Preoperative Staging Axillary Ultrasound is Valuable in the Contemporary Evaluation of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

Author(s):  
Katie N. Hunt ◽  
Lyndsay D. Viers
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1222-1224
Author(s):  
M. S. Javid ◽  
M. Barry

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of axillary US as a preoperative investigation by comparing it with the histology outcome of nodal status. Methods: This validation analysis was conducted in Mater Misericordia university hospital, Dublin Ireland form Feb 2007 to Feb 2015. All female patients with impalpable axillary lymph node and histology proven unifocal breast cancer between ages 18 to 75 years were included. Patients with the diagnosis of breast cancer were followed with Ultrasound imaging and results in Picture Archiving and communication system (PACS) and histology was confirmed using the patient center data base in both preoperative and postoperative course of breast cancer, including both sentinel lymph nodes and axillary lymph nodes. Results: A total of 625 patients had axillary ultrasound (US) to assess the preoperative axillary nodal status with mean age of 56±12 years. cN0 was diagnosed in 469 (75%) cases, cN1 in 136 (21.8%) cases and cN2 in 20 (3.2%) cases. After negative axillary ultrasound cN0 pathology shows positive pN2 and pN3 disease in 14 (2.9%) cases with the NPV of 97.01%. Axillary ultrasound had shown cN1 disease in 136 cases with the pathology outcome of pN2 and pN3 in 41 (30.14%) cases with the negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.85%. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the axillary US in detection of the positive node was 51.6% and 92.8% with PPV of 82.69% and NPV of 74.2%. Conclusion: Axillary US is a useful modality for screening of breast cancer patients. The negative US findings exclude the presence of advanced nodal disease. However, it cannot accurate distinguish between pN1 and pN2 or pN3 nodal disease. Keywords: Axillary ultrasound, Axillary lymph nodes, Breast cancer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhen Zhou ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Zining Jin ◽  
Hailan Yu ◽  
Siyu Ren ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:Axillary ultrasound (AUS) is one of the important bases for evaluating the axillary status of breast cancer patients. And it would be helpful for the reassessment of axillary lymph node status in these patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) and guide the selection of their axillary surgical options.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound,and to find out the factors related to the outcome of ultrasound.Methods:In this retrospective analysis, 172 patients (one bilateral breast cancer) with breast cancer and clinical positive axillary nodes, were enrolled. After NAC, all patients received mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). AUS was used before and after NAC to assess the axilla status. Results:Of the 173 axillae, 137 (79.19%) had pathological metastasis after NAC. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of axillary ultrasound in this cohort were 68.21%, 69.34%, 63.89%, 87.96% and 35.38% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that primary axillary lymph node(ALN) short axis, progesterone receptors, hormone receptors, the tumor status after NAC, tumor reduction rate, ALN short axis after NAC, physical examination of axilla after NAC and pN impacted the results of AUS(P = 0.000 ~ 0.040). Multivariate analysis of the above indicators showed that ALN short axis after NAC and pN associated with AUS results independently. Conclusion:AUS can accurately assess axilla status after NAC in most breast cancer patients. If the short axis of ALN≥10mm and AUS negative, SLNB could be chosen. However, AUS cannot detect residual lymph node disease after NAC in a short axis of the ALN <10mm.


Author(s):  
Enver Özkurt ◽  
Stephanie Wong ◽  
Esther Rhei ◽  
Mehra Golshan ◽  
Jane Brock ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document