Asylum Adjudication, Mental Health and Credibility Evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Hunter ◽  
Linda Pearson ◽  
Mehera San Roque ◽  
Zac Steel

This article examines the central role that credibility assessment plays in refugee determinations. It draws on the authors' own empirical study, Tales of the Unexpected, to display the complex ways in which applicants' poor mental health can affect their capacity to present a 'coherent and plausible‘ account of their experiences. The authors then explore the significant issues arising from the tendency revealed in the Tales study for decision makers to dismiss expert opinions expressed in reports tendered by applicants from psychologists specialising in cross-cultural mental health assessment. For example, consider the decision maker who observed that [The] psychologist reported that the Applicant was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression and that this psychological state was likely to affect his ability to answer questions at an RRT hearing …. [Nevertheless] [Mr S] did not display any difficulty in understanding or answering questions. … He [appeared] alert, engaged, and is clearly an intelligent man. I do not accept that he had any difficulty in understanding proceedings or answering questions.5

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetta Spadaro ◽  
Nayra Anna Martin-Key ◽  
Erin Funnell ◽  
Sabine Bahn

BACKGROUND Currently, the screening of perinatal mental health symptoms is confined to maternity and primary care settings. Critically, the ever-increasing pressure on healthcare systems has resulted in under-recognition of perinatal mental disorders. Digital mental health tools, such as applications (apps) could provide an option for accessible perinatal mental health screening and assessments. However, there is a lack of information regarding the availability and effectiveness of perinatal app options. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the current state of diagnostic and screening apps for perinatal mental health available on the Google Play store (Android) and Apple App store (iOS), and to review their features following the App Evaluation Model framework. METHODS A systematic review approach was used to identify perinatal mental health assessment apps on the Apple App store and Google Play store. 14 apps met inclusion criteria, were downloaded, and reviewed in a standardized manner using the App Evaluation Model framework. The framework comprised 107 questions allowing for a comprehensive assessment of app origin, functionality, engagement features, security, and clinical use. RESULTS The majority of apps were developed by for-profit companies (n=10), followed by private individuals (n=2), and trusted healthcare companies (n=2). Three apps were only available on Android devices, four were available only on iOS devices, and seven on both platforms. Approximately a third of apps (n=5) had been updated within the last 180 days. Most apps did not have enough reviews to display average ratings. Twelve apps offered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in its original version or in rephrased versions. Additionally, one app included screening scales for anxiety, insomnia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Engagement, input, and output features included reminder notifications, connection to therapists, and free writing features. Six apps offered psychoeducational information or references. Privacy policies were available for 11 of the 14 apps, with a median Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level of 12.3 One app claimed to be compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act standards, two apps claimed to be General Data Protection Regulation compliant. Of the apps that could be accessed in full (n=10), all appeared to fulfil the claims stated in their description. Only one app referenced a relevant peer-reviewed study. All the apps provided a warning for use highlighting that the mental health assessment result should not be interpreted as a diagnosis nor as a substitute for medical care, hence all the apps were regarded as reference apps and not self-help tools. Only three apps allowed users to export or email their mental health test results. CONCLUSIONS These results support the view that there is space for designing and improving perinatal mental health applications. To this end, we recommend three areas of focus for app developers and clinicians looking to design apps for perinatal mental health assessment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 88-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Burdett ◽  
Neil Greenberg ◽  
Nicola T. Fear ◽  
Norman Jones

Risk factors for poor mental health among UK veterans include demonstrating symptoms while in service, being unmarried, holding lower rank, experiencing childhood adversity and having a combat role; however, deploy ment to a combat zone does not appear to be associated with mental health outcomes. While presentation of late-onset, post-service difficulties may explain some of the difference between veterans and those in service, delayed-onset post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) appears to be partly explained by prior subthreshold PTSD, as well as other mental health difficulties. In the longer term, veterans do not appear to suffer worse mental health than equivalent civilians. This overall lack of difference, despite increased mental health difficulties in those who have recently left, suggests that veterans are not at risk of worse mental health and/or that poor mental health is a cause, rather than a consequence, of leaving service.


1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
B Nevison Charlotte ◽  
J M Flower Julia ◽  
L N Naish Peter

AbstractA rehabilitation programme for PTSD sufferers has been in operation at the RN Hospital, Haslar, for eight years. During this time a large database has accumulated, comprising a wide range of materials, including case histories and assessments. For this initial evaluation of the course’s efficacy, the data from three standard mental health assessment instruments were examined. Scores on all measures revealed considerable reductions in symptoms over the duration of the course, with some statistically significant improvements maintained at follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Anne Mette Fløe Hvass ◽  
Lene Nyboe ◽  
Kamilla Lanng ◽  
Claus Vinther Nielsen ◽  
Christian Wejse

(1) Background: Recognizing mental health problems in newly arrived refugees poses a challenge. Little is known of the mental health profile of refugees currently arriving in Northern Europe. (2) Method: In total, we included 900 adult (≥18 years old) refugees arriving in Aarhus, Denmark, between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2020. All participants accepted an offer of a voluntary systematic health assessment from the municipality in Aarhus, including a mental health screening. (3) Results: Within this cohort, 26% (237/900) of the participants were referred to the Department of Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, 24% (212/900) were in contact with the department and 21% (185/900) received ≥1 psychiatric diagnosis. Within the subpopulation referred (n = 237), 64% (152/237) were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (DF431), 14% (34/237) with neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F40–F48) and 13% (30/237) with major mood disorders (F30–F39). Among the participants referred to the Department of Psychiatry and participants receiving a diagnosis, we found an overrepresentation of participants originating from the Southern Asian region (Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran) and with an age above 44 years. (4) Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of both referrals and psychiatric diagnoses in newly arrived refugees. Attention to psychiatric conditions in refugees and systematic health assessments during resettlement are needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Silva ◽  
Manuel Paris ◽  
Luis M. Añez

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Potts ◽  
Frank Vitinius ◽  
Yesim Erim ◽  
Gabor Gazdag ◽  
Robert Gribble ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document