scholarly journals Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family in GtoPdb v.2021.3

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David MacEwan

Dysregulated TNFR signalling is associated with many inflammatory disorders, including some forms of arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, and targeting TNF has been an effective therapeutic strategy in these diseases and for cancer immunotherapy [5, 6, 49].

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
David MacEwan

Dysregulated TNFR signalling is associated with many inflammatory disorders, including some forms of arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, and targeting TNF has been an effective therapeutic strategy in these diseases and for cancer immunotherapy [4, 5, 38].


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S483-S484
Author(s):  
J Li ◽  
Z Li ◽  
P Hu ◽  
Z Wen ◽  
Q Cao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients may experience a suboptimal response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. In China, these data are limited. The EXPLORE study aimed to assess the incidence and indicators of suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF agents in IBD patients in real-world practice in the newly industrialised countries. Methods The EXPLORE study was a multinational, retrospective chart review study. In the China subgroup, adult patients from 10 centres diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) and who initiated first anti-TNF treatment between March 2010 and March 2015, were included. The cumulative incidence (CI) of suboptimal response was assessed over 24 months since the anti-TNF initiation. The indicators of suboptimal response included: IBD-related hospitalisation, dose-escalation, discontinuation including switch to another anti-TNF, non-biologic therapy augmentation, or IBD-related surgery. Primary non-response (PNR) and secondary loss of response (SLOR) were defined as any suboptimal response indicator at <4 and ≥4 months after anti-TNF initiation, respectively. Results Overall, 287 first-line anti-TNF treated patients (35 UC; 252 CD) were included: male, UC 54.3% (n = 19), CD 74.6% (n = 188); mean (SD) age (years), UC 43.1 (14.2), CD 31.9 (11.3); median (min-max) disease duration (years), UC 1.0 (0–9), CD <1 year (0–21); median (min-max) follow-up (months), UC 27.6 (24–60), CD 40.0 (24–60). At 12 and 24 months, the CI of suboptimal response to first anti-TNF treatment was 51.4% and 75.7% in UC, 45.4% and 57.0% in CD, respectively (Figure 1). The median time to the first suboptimal response was 7.2 months in UC and 14.3 months in CD. The CI of PNR was 31.2% in UC and 33.7% in CD. The CI of SLOR was 29.4% and 64.7% in UC, 17.7% and 35.2% in CD at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The most frequent first suboptimal response indicator was ‘discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy’ in UC patients (56.3%) while for CD patients it was ‘IBD-related hospitalisation’ (56.1%) followed by ‘augmentation with non-biological therapy’ in both cohorts (UC 31.3%; CD 22.8%). Conclusion Approximately three-quarters of UC and over half of CD patients experienced a suboptimal response to their first anti-TNF agent at 24 months. Given the high unmet needs observed with anti-TNF therapies in China, IBD patients may benefit from greater optimisation of care and new biologic options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document