scholarly journals Compliance programs como atenuante de responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: novedad o gatopardismo

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (281-1) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Héctor Gabriel Vanegas Fernández
Keyword(s):  

La “Ley Orgánica Reformatoria Del Código Orgánico Integral Penal en Materia Anticorrupción”, trae como novedad la incorporación de la figura del compliance o cumplimiento normativo como atenuante para la valoración de la pena ante los delitos cometidos por personas jurídicas en nuestro país; sin embargo realizando un análisis dogmático e interpretativo previo a la reforma podemos concluir que el juzgador siempre contó con las herramientas para valorar una pena atenuada ante un caso de RPPJ, por ende, tal como se explicará, más allá de un incentivo desde el punto de vista normativo para la incorporación de programas de cumplimiento normativo en el seno empresarial, se aboradará la problemática de cómo la reforma no genera para efectos prácticos ninguna novedad, y del mismo modo se explicarán los efectos y consecuencias de la reforma.

Author(s):  
Christian Hauser

AbstractIn recent years, trade-control laws and regulations such as embargoes and sanctions have gained importance. However, there is limited empirical research on the ways in which small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) respond to such coercive economic measures. Building on the literature on organizational responses to external demands and behavioral ethics, this study addresses this issue to better understand how external pressures and managerial decision-making are associated with the scope of trade-control compliance programs. Based on a sample of 289 SMEs, the findings show that the organizational responses of SMEs reflect proportionate adjustments to regulatory pressures but only if decision-makers are well informed and aware of the prevailing rules and regulations. Conversely, uninformed decision-making leads to a disproportionate response resulting in an inadequately reduced scope of the compliance program. In addition, the results indicate that SMEs that are highly integrated into supply chains are susceptible to passing-the-buck behavior.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Samuel Lieberman ◽  
John T. Araneo

Purpose To discuss the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC’s”) increasing focus on disclosure and conflict-of-interest problems arising from how private equity fund (“PE Fund”) managers allocate expenses between management and fund investors. Design/methodology/approach This article summarizes the background of this focus on expense allocations and, drawing from the recent SEC enforcement actions focused on this issue, and identifies the types of both expenses and disclosures that have caught SEC attention. Findings After spending the first two or three years post Dodd-Frank raising awareness of these issues, the SEC has begun to impose large fines over expense-allocation conflicts and disclosure issues. Practical implications It is imperative for PE Fund managers to retain counsel to review their fund offering documents, expense allocation practices, and compliance programs to ensure consistency with the SEC’s recent decisions on these issues. Originality/value Practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document