PENGARUH ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT DISCLOSURE DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi

<p><em>This study aims to examine the effect of enterprise risk management disclosure, board commissaries independent, and committed audit </em><em>on</em><em> firm value. The samples of this study are thirty companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) selected by using purposive sampling method. </em><em>The method of d</em><em>ata analysis</em><em> </em><em>used i</em><em>n this study is</em><em> </em><em>panel </em><em>regressio</em><em>n </em><em>models</em><em> </em><em>. Based on the hypothes</em><em>e</em><em>s test</em><em>ing</em><em> </em><em>result,</em><em> that the enterprise risk management disclosure significantly no effect on firm value, meanwhile board commissaries independent, and community audit have positive significant effect on firm value</em><em></em></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh<em> Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure, </em>Dewan Komisaris Independen dan Komite Audit terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah tiga puluh perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia yang dipilih dengan menggunakan <em>purposive sampling</em>, Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah model regresi panel. Berdasarkan hipotesis hasil pengujian bahwa <em>Enterprise risk management disclosure</em> tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan Dewan komisaris independen dan komite audit berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan</p>

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi

<p><em>This study aims to examine the effect of enterprise risk management disclosure, board commissaries independent, and committed audit </em><em>on</em><em> firm value. The samples of this study are thirty companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) selected by using purposive sampling method. </em><em>The method of d</em><em>ata analysis</em><em> </em><em>used i</em><em>n this study is</em><em> </em><em>panel </em><em>regressio</em><em>n </em><em>models</em><em> </em><em>. Based on the hypothes</em><em>e</em><em>s test</em><em>ing</em><em> </em><em>result,</em><em> that the enterprise risk management disclosure significantly no effect on firm value, meanwhile board commissaries independent, and community audit have positive significant effect on firm value</em><em></em></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh<em> Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure, </em>Dewan Komisaris Independen dan Komite Audit terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah tiga puluh perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia yang dipilih dengan menggunakan <em>purposive sampling</em>, Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah model regresi panel. Berdasarkan hipotesis hasil pengujian bahwa <em>Enterprise risk management disclosure</em> tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan Dewan komisaris independen dan komite audit berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan</p>


Equity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Jetmi Ade Cecasmi ◽  
Samin Samin

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of Board of Commissioner, Leverage, and Ownership Structure on the Enterprise Risk Management disclosure of banking firm listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period from 2013 to 2015. Sampling technique using purposive sampling (purposive sampling method). The sampel used in this study is a banking company that meets the criteriaas set out in this study to obtain 21 banking. The data obtained derived from the annualreport and financial report of the banks publishe. The analysis technique used in this research is multiple linear regression to test the classical assumption first. The result showed that the Board of Commissioner have a significant influence on the Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure. Leverageand Ownership Structure is not significantly effects on Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure.


Equity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Jetmi Ade Cecasmi ◽  
Samin Samin

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of Board of Commissioner, Leverage, and Ownership Structure on the Enterprise Risk Management disclosure of banking firm listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period from 2013 to 2015. Sampling technique using purposive sampling (purposive sampling method). The sampel used in this study is a banking company that meets the criteriaas set out in this study to obtain 21 banking. The data obtained derived from the annualreport and financial report of the banks publishe. The analysis technique used in this research is multiple linear regression to test the classical assumption first. The result showed that the Board of Commissioner have a significant influence on the Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure. Leverageand Ownership Structure is not significantly effects on Enterprise Risk Management Disclosure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hudi Kurniawanto ◽  
Bambang Widarno

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance on enterprise risk management disclosure in Indonesia. Corporate governance is defined as size of the board of commissioners and the proportion of independent commissioners. This study also uses firm size as a control variable.The samples are selected using purposive sampling, with 117 annual reports from non-financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in the year 2014-2016. The results of this study prove that size of the board of commissioners has effects on enterprise risk management disclosure, while the proportion of independent commissioners does not affect enterprise risk management disclosure. Variable company size in this study affect enterprise risk management disclosure. This shows that the greater the number of commissioners, the better the level of supervision and pressure on management, thus encouraging management to be more transparent in disclosing enterprise risk management.Keywords: Enterprise risk management disclosure, Corporate Governance, Non-financial company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange


GIS Business ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Nouman Nasir

This research examines the effect of enterprise risk management on firm value in Pakistan. Further, this study empirically examines company characteristics that establish the execution of an enterprise risk management system. Using a sample of final dataset of 83 non-financial firms located in Pakistan. The sample included non-financial firms from the year 1999 to 2015 and so up to seventeen observation years per company. As in context of Pakistan, most of the organizations are already implement an ERM programs and establish specialized ERM departments because the ERM is now a global term and has become increasingly relevant because of the growing difficulty of risk and an additional development of regulatory frame works. For the empirical evidences, data collected from non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Results of logistic regression shows that Capital Opacity, Profitability, Financial Leverage, Firm Size and Slack have positive impact on the implementation of an ERM system but Industrial diversification, Industry and Return on Equity are negatively related to an ERM engagement. The results of ordinary least square regression finds positive relationship between use of an ERM and firm value.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dihin Septyanto ◽  
Ikhwan Maulid Nugraha

The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of enterprise risk management (ERM) disclosure, leverage, firm size and profitability on firm value, which is proxied by Tobin’s Q. High corporate value can reflect the shareholders’ wealth. This study used the Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD). The sample included 32 companies, chosen with nonprobability purposive sampling. This study used a quantitative approach with descriptive analysis methods and panel data regression to test hypotheses using the Eviews 10 application. ERM disclosure, leverage and profitability had a positive and significant influence on firm value, while firm size had a negative influence on firm value. The implication of this research is that where ERM has a positive influence on firm value, it is good for companies to increase ERM disclosure, because the company will be considered to have managed its risks well. Debt policy variables that are proxied by the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) and profitability proxied by ROA had a positive effect on firm value. That is, a higher value of DER was followed by an increase in the percentage of Return On Assets (ROA), which increased the firm’s value. However, the company’s size variable which was proxied by Ln Total Assets had a negative effect on the value of the company, which indicated that investors dislike company assets that are too high and that are not offset by high profits. Keywords: enterprise risk management, leverage, firm size, profitability, firm value


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iswajuni Iswajuni ◽  
Arina Manasikana ◽  
Soegeng Soetedjo

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) with firm size, ROA and managerial ownership as control variables on firm value that is proxied by Tobin’s Q. Design/methodology/approach Population of this research was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2010–2013. The used method in this research is multiple linear regression-ordinary least square and hypotheses testing using t-test to test the regression coefficients with level of significance of 5 percent. Findings The results showed that ERM, ROA and size of the company have a significant positive effect on the firm value. While the managerial ownership has a significant negative effect on the firm value. Originality/value The results showed that firm value increases as ERM, ROA and size of the company improves. While the managerial ownership has a significant negative effect on the firm value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Mochamad Muslih

<p>There were inconsistencies on the results of some ERM researches formerly.  There were some variabilities on the benefits and obstacles hampering the implementation of ERM.  The purpose of this research is to study the benefits of  Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to increase firm performance.</p><p>This research used quantitative method, using the statistical software  of eviews 9 to process the data samples.  The Sampled firms arecompanies listed in the Indonesian stock exchange. 108 questionnaires were filled by the respondents. The variables measured are firm performances and enterprise risk management. The implementation of corporate governance and firm performance are also measured as control variables. Regression procedures were used to analyze the data samples. Some secondary data were also used to enrich analizing the research phenomena.</p><p>The research findings showed a significant relationship between ERM with firm performance. The effect of ERM as independent variable on firm performance waso significant so that the influence of corporate governance (CG) as  control variable became insignificant. Actually based on individual regression, CG influence on firm performance is significant. But totally the influence became insignificant, hampered by the magnitude of ERM influence significancy. These findings add to positive heuristics of falsification model of research as proposed by Imre Lakatos.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
LINDA SANTIOSO ◽  
NURAINUN BANGUN ◽  
YUNIARWATI YUNIARWATI

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of profitability, enterprise risk management and corporate social responsibility on firm value. The sample of this research limited to manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013-2015. This research uses 150 data with 50 companies selected per year. Analysis tool used multiple linear regression of SPSS 21.00. The dependent variable on this research is firm value, and the independent variable returns on equity, enterprise risk management, and corporate social responsibility. The result showed that return on equity and enterprise risk management affect the firm value, while corporate social responsibility has no effect on firm value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document