scholarly journals Implementation of a Mental Health Guideline in a Long-Term Care Home: A Participatory Action Approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Huijbregts ◽  
Lisa Guttman Sokoloff ◽  
Sid Feldman ◽  
David K. Conn ◽  
Kelsey Simons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Satisfaction Survey ◽  
Staff Satisfaction ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Care ◽  
Health Guideline

AbstractBackground: The goal of this pilot study was to implement a Canadian mental health guideline in a long-term care residence in order to improve interprofessional care of clients with mood and behavioural issues.Methods: Using a participatory action approach, this pilot study engaged staff/physicians, residents, and families in identifying key priorities for action related to the goal of improving interprofessional care. This resulted in the implementation of educational interventions, a mandate for non-registered nursing staff to attend interprofessional rounds, and enhanced interprofessional collaboration through unit-based huddles. A staff satisfaction survey and focus groups were conducted to assess perceptions of change.Findings: The staff satisfaction survey revealed statistically significant improvements in perceived job satisfaction, leadership, and workplace resources. Focus group findings indicated improved interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, support, and communication. Staff noted a stronger perception of being valued and increased confidence in their own contributions.Conclusions: Both qualitative and quantitative improvements were noted in staffjob satisfaction. Despite some limitations, these findings suggest that further dissemination of this initiative with rigorous evaluation is warranted.

scholarly journals Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: an exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hurlock-Chorostecki ◽  
Mary van Soeren ◽  
Kathleen MacMillan ◽  
Souraya Sidani ◽  
Faith Donald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Care

Background Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. Method Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of “knotworking” to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. Results Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. Conclusions Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed.

scholarly journals Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: an exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hurlock-Chorostecki ◽  
Mary van Soeren ◽  
Kathleen MacMillan ◽  
Souraya Sidani ◽  
Faith Donald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Interprofessional Care

Background Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. Method Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of “knotworking” to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. Results Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. Conclusions Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed.

scholarly journals Health problems and violence experiences of nurses working in acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, and home-based long-term care in Germany: A systematic review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260050
Author(s):  
Andrea Schaller ◽  
Teresa Klas ◽  
Madeleine Gernert ◽  
Kathrin Steinbeißer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Care Facilities

Background Working in the nursing sector is accompanied by great physical and mental health burdens. Consequently, it is necessary to develop target-oriented, sustainable profession-specific support and health promotion measures for nurses. Objectives The present review aims to give an overview of existing major health problems and violence experiences of nurses in different settings (acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, and home-based long-term care) in Germany. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and PubPsych and completed by a manual search upon included studies’ references and health insurance reports. Articles were included if they had been published after 2010 and provided data on health problems or violence experiences of nurses in at least one care setting. Results A total of 29 studies providing data on nurses health problems and/or violence experience were included. Of these, five studies allowed for direct comparison of nurses in the settings. In addition, 14 studies provided data on nursing working in acute care hospitals, ten on nurses working in long-term care facilities, and four studies on home-based long-term care. The studies either conducted a setting-specific approach or provided subgroup data from setting-unspecific studies. The remaining studies did not allow setting-related differentiation of the results. The available results indicate that mental health problems are the highest for nurses in acute care hospitals. Regarding violence experience, nurses working in long-term care facilities appear to be most frequently affected. Conclusion The state of research on setting-specific differences of nurses’ health problems and violence experiences is insufficient. Setting-specific data are necessesary to develop target-group specific and feasible interventions to support the nurses’ health and prevention of violence, as well as dealing with violence experiences of nurses.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Long-Term Care Residents’ Mental Health: A Data-Driven Approach in New Brunswick

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-192
Author(s):  
Caitlin McArthur ◽  
Margaret Saari ◽  
George A. Heckman ◽  
Nathalie Wellens ◽  
Julie Weir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
New Brunswick ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Driven Approach

scholarly journals THE EXTREME FACE OF SOCIAL ISOLATION: A COHORT STUDY OF UNBEFRIENDED INDIVIDUALS IN LONG-TERM CARE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S532-S533
Author(s):  
Stephanie Chamberlain ◽  
Wendy Duggleby ◽  
Pamela B Teaster ◽  
Janet Fast ◽  
Carole Estabrooks
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Poor Health ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Family Contact

Abstract Even though social isolation is a significant predictor of poor health and mortality in older adults, very little is known about social isolation in long-term care (LTC) settings. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence, demographic characteristics, health outcomes, and disease diagnoses of residents without family contact in Alberta LTC homes. Using data collected between April 2008 and March 2018, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Resident Assessment Instrument, Minimum Data Set, (RAI-MDS 2.0) data from 34 LTC facilities in Alberta. We identified individuals who had no contact with family or friends. Using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression, we compared the characteristics, disease diagnoses, and functional status of individuals who had no contact with family and individuals who did have contact with family. We identified a cohort of 25,330 individuals, of whom 945 had no contact with family or friends. Different from residents who had family, the cohort with no contact was younger (81.47 years, SD=11.79), and had a longer length of stay (2.71 years, SD=3.63). For residents who had contact with family, residents with no contact had a greater number of mental health diagnoses, including depression (OR: 1.21, [95% CI: 1.06-1.39]), bipolar disorder (OR: 1.80, [95% CI: 1.22-2.68]), and schizophrenia (OR: 3.9, [95% CI: 2.96-5.14]). Interpretation: Residents without family contact had a number of unique care concerns, including mental health issues and poor health outcomes. These findings have implications for the training of staff and LTC services available to these vulnerable residents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document