scholarly journals Varieties of Ethics in Academia: Rationalities of Scientific Responsibility in the (German) March for Science

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
1986 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
A. Kenneth Fuller ◽  
Angela E. Fuller

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Muhammad Feyzar Rif'at ◽  
Mustika Wati ◽  
Suyidno Suyidno

Scientific responsibility and creativity are part of the main competencies in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0, but they are not trained in schools. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Learning in exploring the responsibility and scientific creativity of students. This research is part of research and development with the ADDIE model, namely at the implementation and evaluation stages. The research trial used one group pre-test and post-test on 27 students of class XI MIPA 2 MAN 2 Banjarmasin. Data collection instruments consist of responsibility observation sheets with indicators of participating, respecting others, cooperation, leading, and expressing opinions; as well as a scientific creativity test which includes indicators of finding problems, imagining scientifically, solving problems creatively, and designing products creatively. The results showed that the responsibility of the students at each meeting was in good criteria. In addition, the scientific creativity N-gain was 0.34 in the medium criteria. Thus, CRBL is effectively used to explore the responsibility and scientific creativity of students.  Kata kunci: creative responsibility based learning, scientific creativity, responsibility AbstrakTanggung jawab dan kreativitas ilmiah merupakan bagian dari kompetensi utama di era revolusi industri 4.0, namun kurang dilatihkan di sekolah. O


2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Hilde W. Nagell ◽  
Lisbeth Wittøfft Nielsen

2009 ◽  
Vol 409 ◽  
pp. 28-42
Author(s):  
Richard C. Bradt

Evidence regarding a fracture event is absolutely and definitively recorded by Nature during the fracture process. That record is in the form of the general macrocrack pattern and the surface topological features of the newly formed fracture surface. In reality, it is the only perfect record of what actually occurred during a fracture. Whenever a conflict or controversy arises regarding a fracture, it is the moral and scientific responsibility of the fractographer to analyze and interpret the record of the fracture as it was created by Nature. It is further necessary for the fractographer to then inform and educate the members of the legal community (lawyer, judge and jury) as to exactly what happened during the failure. This educational process is necessary so that the legal community can collectively understand the history of the fracture and arrive at a just and fair decision regarding responsibility and potential liability for the failure. This paper describes the overall process from the beginning of the fracture examination of the failed artifact to the final appearance in court leading to a decision by the judge or a jury. Both the technical and the human factors are addressed with varying degrees of detail.


EMBO Reports ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 992-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zubin Master ◽  
David B Resnik

Science ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 159 (3811) ◽  
pp. 147-148
Author(s):  
J. H. Steward

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document