MENGEKSPLORASI TANGGUNG JAWAB DAN KREATIVITAS ILMIAH PESERTA DIDIK MELALUI CREATIVE RESPONSIBILITY BASED LEARNING

Scientific responsibility and creativity are part of the main competencies in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0, but they are not trained in schools. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Learning in exploring the responsibility and scientific creativity of students. This research is part of research and development with the ADDIE model, namely at the implementation and evaluation stages. The research trial used one group pre-test and post-test on 27 students of class XI MIPA 2 MAN 2 Banjarmasin. Data collection instruments consist of responsibility observation sheets with indicators of participating, respecting others, cooperation, leading, and expressing opinions; as well as a scientific creativity test which includes indicators of finding problems, imagining scientifically, solving problems creatively, and designing products creatively. The results showed that the responsibility of the students at each meeting was in good criteria. In addition, the scientific creativity N-gain was 0.34 in the medium criteria. Thus, CRBL is effectively used to explore the responsibility and scientific creativity of students. Kata kunci: creative responsibility based learning, scientific creativity, responsibility AbstrakTanggung jawab dan kreativitas ilmiah merupakan bagian dari kompetensi utama di era revolusi industri 4.0, namun kurang dilatihkan di sekolah. O

From Traditional Research to Responsible Research: The Necessity of Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility for Better Societies

My research journey spans a period of exciting new theories informing innovative practices in businesses and other organizations and a period littered with concerns about the research-practice gap, questionable research practices, and a strong emphasis on the number of publications in top journals for hiring and promotions. These recent developments led to the dilution of both scientific freedom and scientific responsibility in our scientific work. I offer my research journey to illustrate the importance of both, with the most recent endeavor in a global responsible research movement to produce useful and credible knowledge that will enable business and management practices to serve all stakeholders and to solve the world's most challenging problems. Emerging institutional changes in business schools, journals, associations, and accreditation agencies provide hope that scholars will soon find the conditions favorable for both freedom and responsibility to support their aspiration to pursue research that will contribute to better societies and meaningful careers. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 9 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Developing Students’ Responsibility and Scientific Creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learning in Learning Physics

Development of scientific responsibility and creativity in learning physics are included in the key competencies in the industrial era 4.0. However, both of these competencies are not used in school. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Learning in developing students' responsibility and scientific creativity. This research is part of the research and development of the ADDIE model. Trial implementation using one group pre-test and post-test design on 27 students of Class XI-2 MAN 2 Banjarmasin. Data collection instruments consist of responsibility observation and scientific creativity tests. After being CRBL implemented, the students’ responsibility increased at each meeting in good criteria. Also, the value of n-gain scientific creativity by 0.34 in moderate criteria. Thus, CRBL is effective in developing the students’ responsibility and scientific creativity in learning physics.

Implementing Ethical Principles in Social Research: Challenges, Possibilities and Limitations

The article is based on descriptive theoretical research and focused on ethical principles in social research. It involves considerations on ethical principles and dimensions in social research as well as challenges and limitations for social researchers / scientists when they implement the social research studies. The following research questions are raised in the article: What are the challenges for social researchers / scientists and how to solve them in order to maintain the ethics of research? What commitments include ethical dimensions of social research? What ethical principles are relevant to scientific research, regardless of it‘s specific discipline? The purpose of the research is to consider the possibilities of implementation of ethical principles, limitations, obstacles, and challenges in social research. The author concludes that ethical considerations in social research are critical as they help to determine the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. The essential ethical considerations in social research ethics remains professional competence, integrity, processional and scientific responsibility, respect for research participants’ rights, dignity and diversity, and social responsibility of social researchers / scientists. In the conclusions also is accentuated that social researchers / scientists must be sensitive to cultural, individual, and role differences in serving, teaching, and studying groups of people with distinctive characteristics. In all of their social research-related or based activities they should acknowledge the rights of others to hold values, attitudes, and opinions that differ from their own. Thus social researchers / scientists should be aware of their professional and scientific responsibility to the social sciences communities and societies in which they live and work. They are responsible to apply and make public their knowledge in order to contribute to the public good.

Wissenschaftliches Gewissen – Zur Bestimmung und Kontextualisierung wissenschaftlicher Verantwortung in Schleiermachers Ethikkonzeption

Scientific Conscience – Notion and Contextualization of Scientific Responsibility in Schleiermacher’s Ethics Recent issues concerning the relation of science and ethics are mainly debated with regard to manipulative misconduct by scientists and risk assessment, such as by innovative technology in biomedical sciences and informatics. Elaborating on Schleiermacher’s ethics, Frost approaches a deeper understanding of these issues tracing them back to the relation of freedom and responsibility. From this perspective Schleiermacher’s ethics seem to show the fragility of science as well as the risk of its instrumentalization. Nor the securing of productivity neither the evidence of its efficiency won't proof the social justification of science sufficient; its political and ethical responsibility has always to be taken into consideration.