ACTIVITY OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS AS AN ASPECT OF PRESERVING CULTURAL HERITAGE OF I. S. TURGENEV

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
R.A. BOGATYREV ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Alla Doroha

Based on cultural methodological tools, the trends of the European Year of Cultural Heritage in Ukraine were analysed. The main attention is paid to the problems of improving the legal mechanisms for the protection of cultural heritage, the activities of public organizations for the protection of the national cultural heritage, the cooperation of state and non-governmental organizations of Ukraine with UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the EU in the field of preservation and popularization of cultural heritage. The relevance of the chosen theme determines the need to analyse cultural heritage issues. An emphasis was placed on analysing the formation and evolution of traditions, customs, norms, values in the context of everyday life history. The proclamation of 2018 as the European and Ukrainian Year of Cultural Heritage contributed to intensifying interest to the problems of preservation and further development of all types of national cultural heritage, the adoption of extremely important decisions, and the improvement of the relevant legislation. The year witnessed the maturity of the segment of civil society in Ukraine that cares for cultural heritage. Provided the state and civil society act in the format of mutual support, it is possible to provide a clear policy on this issue at the governmental, regional and local levels. Therefore, the main goal of the further movement is to achieve the unity of state bodies, public organizations, the scientific community and the private sector in preserving all kinds of cultural heritage and protecting the cultural sovereignty of Ukraine.


2021 ◽  
pp. 35-53
Author(s):  
В.А. Садым ◽  
К.Б. Садым

В статье проанализированы практики сохранения и трансляции историко-культурного наследия космонавтики в Краснодарском крае в период с 1960-х гг. до настоящего времени, определена роль данной деятельности в формировании культурной памяти. Основными источниками исследования послужили документы краевого общественного движения «Кубань и космонавтика», краснодарской региональной общественной организации «Федерация космонавтики Кубани», материалы музеев, периодики, интернет-сайтов, изданий, запечатлевших память об освоении космоса, памятники и памятные места, данные топонимики. Авторы рассматривают основные этапы, содержание и тенденции развития «космической» коммеморации, классифицируют «места памяти» и региональные коммеморативные практики, прослеживают преемственность советских и современных подходов. Сделаны выводы о многообразии форм сохранения памяти, об истории покорения космоса и его региональном «измерении», роли коммеморации в формировании региональной идентичности. The article analyzes the practices of preserving and transmitting the historical and cultural heritage of cosmonautics in Krasnodar Krai in the period from the 1960s to the present, and determines the significance of these activities in the formation of cultural memory. Kuban has a rich “space” heritage: scientists, test pilots, and cosmonauts lived and worked here, and dozens of Soviet and Russian cosmonauts, including Yuri Gagarin, visited the region in different years. The main sources of the research were documents of the regional public movement Kuban and Cosmonautics, and the Krasnodar Regional Public Organization Kuban Cosmonautics Federation; materials of museums, periodicals, Internet sites, publications that captured the memory of space exploration, monuments and memorable places, toponymic data, works of fine art. Among the research methods are comparative-historical, typological, retrospective, as well as the method of included observation, due to the long-term activity of one of the authors in Kuban Cosmonautics Federation. New facts about the Kuban cosmonauts and scientists of the space industry are presented. The authors classify “places of memory”. The memorial complexes of cosmonautics in Kuban villages (to Yu.V. Kondratyuk in Oktyabrskaya, to N.G. Chernyshev in Kazan, to G.Ya. Bakhchivandzhi in Brinkovskaya); monuments and busts, commemorative plaques to the figures of cosmonautics (Yu.A. Gagarin, D.I. Kozlov, V.V. Gorbatko, V.I. Sevastyanov, N.G. Chernyshev); museums, including specialized ones (the Museum of Cosmonautics in village Arkhipo-Osipovka, the memorial museum of Yu.V. Kondratyuk, and others); planetariums and observatories; natural objects (memorial trees, alleys). The article describes the activities of Kuban’s public organizations created for the popularization of the legacy of cosmonautics. The influence of space exploration on regional toponyms and names of institutions is noted. The main actors, stages, content and trends in the development of “space” commemoration, its all-Union (all-Russian) and regional components, the continuity of Soviet and modern approaches are considered. The authors conclude the “space” heritage is transmitted through the interaction of public organizations, government agencies, museum and educational institutions, representatives of scientific and artistic intelligentsia. The popularization of the space heritage is essential for patriotic education, for the formation in society of a sense of pride of Russian scientific and technological achievements, and for the dissemination of knowledge about the contribution of the natives of Kuban to space exploration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-595
Author(s):  
Josué Gutiérrez-Barroso ◽  
Alberto Javier Báez-García ◽  
Francisco Flores-Muñoz

The main purpose of this paper is to contribute to analyze recent data about the behavior of national park administrations on Facebook. As public organizations, they endeavor to proactively communicate information to citizens, promoting transparency and accountability. It is important to study the case of national parks because of their relevant role in preserving natural and cultural heritage and promoting a very rich scenario of policy-making and responsible local and global citizenship. Some insights have arisen for political management of these institutions. According to the analysis of the results, it is shown that there exists a significant presence of these entities in Facebook, even if this type of communication is perhaps in its infancy. The results suggest that a potential factor (country in which each park is located and the corresponding administration style) exists, in order to explain significant differences between parks.


The article considers the philosophical foundations of cultural heritage preservation in the Russian Empire in the first half of the 19th century. The article traces how the scientific and practical activities of Russian statesmen and scientists have shaped programs and institutions for the preservation of cultural heritage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-124
Author(s):  
Mikhail A. Demin ◽  
Evgeniya N. Benevalenskaya

Modern studies consider the memorial activity in the context of formation and development of civil society as an important factor of shaping public memory and building national, regional and local identity. The analyzes educational and commemorative practices of the departments of the All-Russian Society of Protection of Historical and Cultural Heritage, the All-Union Geographical Society and the Society “Knowledge” in Altai in 1965–1991. The study bases on application of cross-disciplinary approaches of the intellectual and modern local history. The authors conclude that activities of public associations for identification, studying, registration and popularization of historical landscape objects promoted ideas about the importance of preserving the historical and architectural space of region for collective memory and identity of regional community. Ruling elites supported mainly those social initiatives for protection of monuments which were aimed to promote the values and ideals of Soviet socialism. As a result the indifferent attitude of party and state institutions to protection of archaeological objects and heritage of the pre-revolutionary era, the lack of effective tools of influence on economic organizations and administrative structures by public organizations and the formalism in the work of the Society of Protection of Heritage did not allow to develop practical measures to preserve the archaeological sites and to stop the destruction of the original historical and architectural environment of cities and villages of the region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document