scholarly journals New findings on protected and strictly protected species confirm the value of the prime hoverfly area network

2018 ◽  
pp. 63-71
Author(s):  
Marina Jankovic ◽  
Marija Milicic ◽  
Dimitrije Radisic ◽  
Dubravka Milic ◽  
Ante Vujic
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Models ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Area Network ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Environmental Pressures ◽  
New Findings ◽  
Using Data

With environmental pressures on the rise, the establishment of pro?tected areas is a key strategy for preserving biodiversity. The fact that many species are losing their battle against extinction despite being within protected areas raises the question of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate established Priority Hoverfly Areas (PHAs) and areas that are not yet but could potentially be included in the PHA network, using data from new field surveys. Additionally, species distribution models have been created for two new species recognized as important and added to the list of key hoverfly species. Maps of potential distribution of these species were superimposed on maps of protected areas and PHAs to quantify percentages of overlap. The results of this study are not statisti?cally significant, which could be influenced by a small sample size. However, the results of species distribution models and the extent of overlap with PHAs confirm the utility of these expert-generated designations.

Testing climate-based species distribution models with recent field surveys of pond-breeding amphibians in eastern Missouri

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1074-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Trumbo ◽  
A.A. Burgett ◽  
J.H. Knouft
Keyword(s):  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Models ◽  
Species Range ◽  
Environmental Data ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Field Surveys ◽  
Geographic Ranges ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Study Species

Species distribution models (SDMs) have become an important tool for ecologists by providing the ability to predict the distributions of organisms based on species niche parameters and available habitat across broad geographic areas. However, investigation of the appropriate extent of environmental data needed to make accurate predictions has received limited attention. We investigate whether SDMs developed with regional climate and species locality data (i.e., within Missouri, USA) produce more accurate predictions of species occurrences than models developed with data from across an entire species range. To test the accuracy of the model predictions, field surveys were performed in 2007 and 2008 at 103 study ponds for eight amphibian study species. Models developed using data from across the entire species range did not accurately predict the occurrences of any study species. However, models developed using data only from Missouri produced accurate predictions for four study species, all of which are near the edge of their geographic ranges within the study area. These results suggest that species distribution modeling with regionally focused data may be preferable for local ecological and conservation purposes, and that climate factors may be more important for determining species distributions at the edge of their geographic ranges.

scholarly journals Biological richness of Gunung Slamet, Central Java, and the need for its protection

Oryx ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Christian Devenish ◽  
Achmad Ridha Junaid ◽  
Andriansyah ◽  
Ria Saryanthi ◽  
S. (Bas) van Balen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biodiversity Conservation ◽  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Models ◽  
Survey Methods ◽  
Good Condition ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Area Network ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Terrestrial Mammals ◽  
Central Java

Abstract Designating protected areas remains a core strategy in biodiversity conservation. Despite high endemism, montane forests across the island of Java are under-represented in Indonesia's protected area network. Here, we document the montane biodiversity of Gunung Slamet, an isolated volcano in Central Java, and provide evidence to support its increased protection. During September–December 2018, we surveyed multiple sites for birds, primates, terrestrial mammals, reptiles, amphibians and vegetation. Survey methods included transects, camera traps and targeted searches at six sites, at altitudes of 970–2,512 m. We used species distribution models for birds and mammals of conservation concern to identify priority areas for protection. We recorded 99 bird species (13 globally threatened), 15 mammals (five globally threatened) and 17 reptiles and amphibians (two endemic). Our species distribution models showed considerable cross-taxon congruence between important areas on Slamet's upper slopes, generally above 1,800 m. Particularly important were records of the endemic subspecies of the Endangered Javan laughingthrush Garrulax rufifrons slamatensis, not recorded in the wild since 1925, the Endangered Javan gibbon Hylobates moloch and Javan surili Presbytis comata, and the Vulnerable Javan lutung Trachypithecus auratus and Javan leopard Panthera pardus melas. Recent forest loss has been modest, at least 280 km2 of continuous forest remain above 800 m, and our surveys show that forest habitats are in good condition. However, the mountain is widely used by trappers and hunters. Given its importance for biodiversity conservation, we discuss different options for improving the protection status of Gunung Slamet, including designation as a National Park or Essential Ecosystem.

scholarly journals Protected Area Networks Do Not Represent Unseen Diversity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Delso ◽  
Jesús Muñoz ◽  
Javier Fajardo
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Species Distribution ◽  
Conservation Planning ◽  
Protected Area ◽  
Species Distribution Models ◽  
Systematic Conservation Planning ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Current Area ◽  
Planning Approaches

Abstract Most existing protected area networks are usually biased to protect charismatic species or showy landscapes. We hypothesized that conservation networks designed including unseen diversity –groups usually species-rich but consisting of inconspicuous taxa, or affected by knowledge gaps– would be more efficient than networks ignoring those groups. To test this hypothesis, we created species distribution models for 3,006 species of arthropods and determined which were represented in three networks of different size and biogeographic origin. We assessed the efficiency of each network using spatial prioritization to measure its completeness –increment needed to achieve conservation targets– and specificity –how much overlap the priority areas based on unseen diversity with existing networks. We find that representativeness of unseen diversity in existing protected areas –extrinsic representativeness– was low, as ~40% of unseen diversity species were unprotected. We also find that existing networks should be expanded by an additional ~26-46% of their current area to complete targets, and that specificity can be as low as 8.8%, meaning that existing networks are not efficient to conserve unseen diversity. We conclude that information on unseen diversity must be included in systematic conservation planning approaches to design more efficient and ecologically representative protected areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document