scholarly journals Constitutional Law: Due Process: Judicial Review of Jury Determination on Coerced Character of Confession

1955 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 468
Author(s):  
James M. Potter
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process

scholarly journals Constitutional Law: Due Process: Right of Alien Enemy to Judicial Review of Deportation Proceeding

1949 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Robert P. Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process

James Bryce and the Australian Constitution

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-200
Author(s):  
Stephen Gageler
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Constitution ◽  
Constitutional Development ◽  
Practical Operation ◽  
Responsible Government ◽  
Shed Light

James Bryce was a contemporary of Albert Venn Dicey. Bryce published in 1888 The American Commonwealth. Its detailed description of the practical operation of the United States Constitution was influential in the framing of the Australian Constitution in the 1890s. The project of this article is to shed light on that influence. The article compares and contrasts the views of Bryce and of Dicey; Bryce's views, unlike those of Dicey, having been largely unexplored in contemporary analyses of our constitutional development. It examines the importance of Bryce's views on two particular constitutional mechanisms – responsible government and judicial review – to the development of our constitutional structure. The ongoing theoretical implications of The American Commonwealth for Australian constitutional law remain to be pondered.

Constitutional Law. Due Process of Law. Foreign Attachment

1903 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 829
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Due Process Of Law

Constitutional Law. Due Process. Disabled Animals

1902 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 214
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process

Constitutional Law: Due Process: Fishing Rights in the Public Waters of Michigan

1934 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 858
Author(s):  
Maurice S. Culp
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Fishing Rights ◽  
The Public

WHAT ARE CONSTITUTIONS, AND WHAT SHOULD (AND CAN) THEY DO?

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Alexander
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Constitution ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Constitutional Change ◽  
Principal Function ◽  
Fundamental Law

AbstractA constitution is, as Article VI of the United States Constitution declares, the fundamental law of the land, supreme as a legal matter over any other nonconstitutional law. But that almost banal statement raises a number of theoretically vexed issues. What is law? How is constitutional law to be distinguished from nonconstitutional law? How do morality and moral rights fit into the picture? And what are the implications of the answers to these questions for such questions as how and by whom should constitutions be interpreted? These are the issues that I shall address.Alexander proceeds as follows: In section I he takes up law's principal function of settling controversies over what we are morally obligated to do. In section II he then relate law's settlement function to the role of constitutional law. In particular, he discusses how constitutional law is distinguished from ordinary law, and he also discusses the role of constitutions in establishing basic governmental structures and enforcing certain moral rights. In section III he addresses the topic of constitutional interpretation, and in section IV the topic of judicial review. Finally, in section V, he discusses constitutional change, both change that occurs through a constitution's own rules for amendments and change that is the product of constitutional misinterpretations and revolutions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document