Observations on the Ascending Tracts in the Spinal Cord of the Human Subject

1900 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Colin C. Stewart ◽  
E. E. Laslett ◽  
W. B. Warrington
Brain ◽  
1899 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. LASLETT ◽  
W. B. WARRINGTON

The exact line of demarcation between the tracts of nervous matter, subservient to motion and to sensation, which compose the spinal cord, has not yet been clearly determined. The proofs which exist of a power residing in the cerebellum which regulates and controls the actions of muscles, would lead us to suppose that the fibres of the motor nerves are continuous with those of the cerebellum ; but hitherto no observations have been made which prove the existence of this connexion ; and it is the object of the author, in this paper, to establish, by a more careful examination of the anatomical structure of this part of the nervous system, such continuity of fibres between the anterior columns of the spinal cord and the cerebellum.


1903 ◽  
Vol 71 (467-476) ◽  
pp. 444-445

Recent advances in our knowledge of the arrangement of the motor cells in the anterior cornua of the spinal cord of man have been made almost entirely by the study of the changes produced in these cells by the division or removal of limbs or parts of limbs in the human subject, and very little has, as yet, been done to elucidate this subject by the comparative method of investigation.


While engaged in studying experimentally the connections of the cells of Clarke’s column with the ascending tracts of the spinal cord in the Monkey, I was surprised to find that after hemisection in the lower dorsal region, the sensory disturbances produced in no way corresponded with those already obtained by an eminent observer. I was, therefore, led to continue my experiments, with the aid of a grant from the British Medical Association, and by the kind permission of Professor Schäfer I carried them out in the Physiological Laboratory of University College. My thanks are also due to him for much valuable advice and assistance.


1919 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Burton Cleland ◽  
A. W. Campbell

1. The disease is an acute encephalo-myelitis produced by a virus akin to, but not identical with, that of the Heine-Medin disease.2. The disease was readily communicated, with fatal results, to monkeys (Macacus rhesus) by intracerebral inoculation of a suitably-prepared emulsion of nervous substance (brain, cerebellum, pons, medulla and spinal cord) from the human subject dead from “X disease.” Moreover, the virus was found to breed true in a succession of thirteen monkey (Macacus rhesus) generations.3. The disease was not communicated to Macacus cynomolgus (several trials).4. The disease was communicated by the above-mentioned method from monkey to sheep (10 times), from sheep back to monkey and on again from monkey to monkey.5. A certain number of sheep, perhaps 50 per cent., were found wholly insusceptible to the disease; others suffered lightly and recovered.6. The disease was communicated, with fatal results, by the same method, from monkey to horse (1 case) and to calf (1 case). Two calves suffered lightly after intracerebral inoculation of the usual virus-containing material taken from monkey and horse respectively.7. The virus appears to be held back completely, or to a great degree, by the pores of a Berkefeld filter.8. Storage of the virus-containing material in diluted glycerine, under cool conditions, for longer than a few days, reduced or annulled its nocive properties.9. Drying of the virus-containing material in Petri dishes, in an incubator, probably destroys its activity.10. In the case of the sheep, there was failure to induce the disease by swabbing the nostrils with virus-containing emulsion.11. There is some evidence that in the case of the sheep and the calf a previous inoculation with the virus confers immunity.12. One experiment suggested that artificial immunity might be induced in the monkey by inoculation of virus treated with serum from an “X disease” sheep.13. Intracerebral inoculation of three dogs, one kitten, two rabbits and one hen failed to produce any signs of the disease; and similar inoculations of two guinea-pigs gave doubtful results.14. Treatment of the virus-containing emulsion with (a) normal human serum, (b) serum from recovered human cases of “acute poliomyelitis” and (c) serum from “X disease” sheep prolonged the incubation period of the disease in the monkey but did not destroy the virus.15. Normal sheep serum and serum from “X disease” sheep did not neutralise the virus in its operation on other sheep.16. Two experiments suggested that the virus was no longer present in the monkey on the eighth or tenth day of illness.17. Two experiments towards the end of the investigation suggested a waning in strength of the virus.18. Intraperitoneal and intrasciatic inoculations of virus-containing material, also intracerebral inoculations of cerebro-spinal fluid, of a filtrate of faeces, of a “Noguchi culture,” of an emulsion of fowl ticks, of naso-pharyngeal swabs from human cases and contacts, and inoculations into veins, all failed.


1892 ◽  
Vol 50 (302-307) ◽  
pp. 120-121

While engaged in studying experimentally the connexions of the cells of Clarke’s column with the ascending tracts of the spinal cord in the monkey, I was surprised to find that after hemisection in the lower dorsal region the sensory disturbances produced in no way corresponded with those already obtained by eminent observers.


2010 ◽  
pp. 248-253
Author(s):  
George Samandouras

Chapter 6.2 covers spinal cord anatomy, including gross anatomy, ascending tracts, descending tracts, major motor and sensory spinal cord nuclei, and lesions and spinal cord syndromes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document