Songs of Experience: Commentary on “Dyslexia the Invisible” and “Promoting Strategic Writing by Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities: A Report of Three Case Studies”

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Gersten ◽  
Joyce Smith-Johnson
1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall H. Raskind ◽  
Eleanor Higgins

This study investigated the effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Subjects proofread self-generated written language samples under three conditions: (a) using a speech synthesis system that simultaneously highlighted and “spoke” words on a computer monitor, (b) having the text read aloud to them by another person, and (c) receiving no assistance. Using the speech synthesis system enabled subjects to detect a significantly higher percentage of total errors than either of the other two proofreading conditions. In addition, subjects were able to locate a significantly higher percentage of capitalization, spelling, usage and typographical errors under the speech synthesis condition. However, having the text read aloud by another person significantly outperformed the other conditions in finding “grammar-mechanical” errors. Results are discussed with regard to underlying reasons for the overall superior performance of the speech synthesis system and the implications of using speech synthesis as a compensatory writing aid for postsecondary students with learning disabilities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikyung Shin ◽  
Nari Choi

Over the last decade, there has been a rapidly declining trend in the prevalence of students with learning disabilities in South Korea. In 2019, only 1.5% of students receiving special education support were identified as having learning disabilities. This study reports on three current issues related to learning disabilities to provide a greater understanding of this declining trend in South Korea: the ongoing debate on the definition of students with learning disabilities, the continuing disagreement on the identification criteria for students with learning disabilities, and the public’s limited understanding of learning disabilities. Suggestions for future directions are also discussed.


1997 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Larrivee ◽  
Melvyn I. Semmel ◽  
Michael M. Gerber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document