AbstractThe evolution of ecological specialization can be summed up in a single question: why would a species evolve a more-restricted niche space? Various hypotheses have been developed to explain the promotion or suppression of ecological specialization. One hypothesis, competitive diversification, states that increased intraspecific competition will cause a population to broaden its niche breadth. With individuals alike in resource use preference, more individuals reduce the availability of preferred resources and should grant higher fitness to those that use secondary resources. However, recent studies cast doubt on this hypothesis with increased intraspecific competition reducing niche breadth in some systems. We present a game-theoretic evolutionary model showing greater ecological specialization with intraspecific competition under specific conditions. This is in contrast to the competitive diversification hypothesis. Our analysis reveals that specialization can offer a competitive advantage. Largely, when facing weak competition, more specialized individuals are able to acquire more of the preferred resources without greatly sacrificing secondary resources and therefore gain higher fitness. Only when competition is too great for an individual to significantly affect resource use will intraspecific competition lead to an increased niche breadth. Other conditions, such as a low diversity of resources and a low penalty to specialization, help promote ecological specialization in the face of intraspecific competition. Through this work, we have been able to discover a previously unseen role that intraspecific competition plays in the evolution of ecological specialization.
Competition and the origins of novelty: experimental evolution of niche-width expansion in a virus
