Community Ecology and Conservation of Bear-Salmon Ecosystems

Apex predators play keystone roles in ecosystems through top-down control, but the effects of apex omnivores on ecosystems could be more varied because changes in the resource base alter their densities and reverberate through ecosystems in complex ways. In coastal temperate ecosystems throughout much of the Northern Hemisphere, anadromous salmon once supported abundant bear populations, but both taxa have declined or been extirpated from large parts of their former ranges with limited research on the consequences of diminished or absent interactions among species. Here we review the biogeography of bear-salmon interactions and the role of salmon-subsidized bears in (1) resource provisioning to plants and scavengers through the distribution of salmon carcasses, (2) competition among bears and other large carnivores, (3) predation of ungulate neonates, (4) seed dispersal, and (5) resource subsidies to rodents with seed-filled scats. In addition to our review of the literature, we present original data to demonstrate two community-level patterns that are currently unexplained. First, deer densities appear to be consistently higher on islands with abundant brown bears than adjacent islands with black bears and wolves, and moose calf survival is higher at low bear densities (<∼25 bears per 100 km2) but is constant across the vast majority of bear densities found in the wild (i.e., ∼>25 bears per 100 km2). Our review and empirical data highlight key knowledge gaps and research opportunities to understand the complex ecosystem effects related to bear-salmon interactions.

Large contribution of pulsed subsidies to a predatory fish inhabiting large stream channels

Resource subsidies exert critical influences on recipient habitats with relatively higher perimeter-to-area ratios, such as headwaters in watersheds. However, little is known about how those subsidies contribute to the energy sources in recipient habitats where the perimeter-to-area ratio is low, such as large stream channels. Here, we show that the diet of small Japanese eels (Anguilla japonica) <500 mm in total length inhabiting natural shoreline areas in large stream channels consists largely of terrestrial earthworms (Metaphire spp.). Stable isotopic analyses showed that the earthworms were the prey animal that contributed most to the eels’ diet (45%–47%). Earthworms constituted the largest portion of the eels’ stomach contents (7%–93%). Eels ingested earthworms within 2 days after rainfall during spring, summer, and autumn, and their consumption increased as the precipitation increased. These findings indicate that the pulsed earthworm subsidy that is driven by rainfall could temporarily bias the eels’ diet toward this allochthonous resource, which may explain the large contribution of the subsidy for consumers inhabiting large stream channels. Furthermore, diverse earthworm species could drive multiple pulsed subsidies across seasons and provide the predators with a prolonged subsidy, enhancing the long-term contribution of the subsidy to the predators’ diet.

Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout

Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts.

Hippopotamus are distinct from domestic livestock in their resource subsidies to and effects on aquatic ecosystems

In many regions of the world, populations of large wildlife have been displaced by livestock, and this may change the functioning of aquatic ecosystems owing to significant differences in the quantity and quality of their dung. We developed a model for estimating loading rates of organic matter (dung) by cattle for comparison with estimated rates for hippopotamus in the Mara River, Kenya. We then conducted a replicated mesocosm experiment to measure ecosystem effects of nutrient and carbon inputs associated with dung from livestock (cattle) versus large wildlife (hippopotamus). Our loading model shows that per capita dung input by cattle is lower than for hippos, but total dung inputs by cattle constitute a significant portion of loading from large herbivores owing to the large numbers of cattle on the landscape. Cattle dung transfers higher amounts of limiting nutrients, major ions and dissolved organic carbon to aquatic ecosystems relative to hippo dung, and gross primary production and microbial biomass were higher in cattle dung treatments than in hippo dung treatments. Our results demonstrate that different forms of animal dung may influence aquatic ecosystems in fundamentally different ways when introduced into aquatic ecosystems as a terrestrially derived resource subsidy.

The effects of resource subsidy duration on detritus-based stream ecosystem: a stream mesocosm experiment

SummaryMost of the resource subsidies are temporally variable, and studies have revealed that ecological processes can be mediated by the temporal attributes of subsidies, such as timing and frequency. Less studies have, however, examined the effects of the subsidy duration, an another major temporal attribute, on consumer populations, communities and ecosystem functions. Using an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we demonstrated that, even with the same total amounts, the prolonged subsidy let large-stage fish effectively monopolize the subsidy over small-stage fish, while the pulsed subsidy allowed small-stage fish to increase the ingestion rate of the subsidy. This effect resulted in causing weaker indirect positive effects on in-situ benthic prey and a leaf breakdown rate with the prolonged subsidy than with the pulsed-subsidy although it depended on dominant benthic prey species having different edibility. Increasing evidences have shown that global warming would not only advance, but also prolong the growing seasons, which may, in turn, make subsidies more prolonged. The ecological significance of the subsidy duration might be common in nature, and should be incorporated to better understand ecological processes in spatially and temporally coupled ecosystems.

Modeling the Effects of Resource-Driven Immune Defense on Parasite Transmission in Heterogeneous Host Populations

Individuals experience heterogeneous environmental conditions that can affect within-host processes such as immune defense against parasite infection. Variation among individuals in parasite shedding can cause some hosts to contribute disproportionately to population-level transmission, but we currently lack mechanistic theory that predicts when environmental conditions can result in large disease outbreaks through the formation of immunocompromised superspreading individuals. Here, I present a within-host model of a microparasite’s interaction with the immune system that links an individual host’s resource intake to its infectious period. For environmental scenarios driving population-level heterogeneity in resource intake (resource scarcity and resource subsidy relative to baseline availability), I generate a distribution of infectious periods and simulate epidemics on these heterogeneous populations. I find that resource scarcity can result in large epidemics through creation of superspreading individuals, while resource subsidies can reduce or prevent transmission of parasites close to their invasion threshold by homogenizing resource allocation to immune defense. Importantly, failure to account for heterogeneity in competence can result in under-prediction of outbreak size, especially when parasites are close to their invasion threshold. More generally, this framework suggests that differences in conditions experienced by individual hosts can lead to superspreading via differences in resource allocation to immune defense alone, even in the absence of other heterogeneites such as host contacts.