Prayer in the Public Schools: Law and Attitude Change. By William K. MuirJr. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. Pp. 170. $5.95.) - The Dynamics of Compliance: Supreme Court Decision-Making from a New Perspective. By Richard M. Johnson. (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967. Pp. 176. $5.95.)

1968 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1285-1287
Author(s):  
Sheldon Goldman
2021 ◽  
pp. 128-164
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Kearney ◽  
Thomas W. Merrill

This chapter assesses the implications of natural accretion, unauthorized landfilling, and a legally sanctioned public works project on the neighborhood known today as Streeterville. It illustrates the three periods following the struggle for control of the land of Streeterville: the first was relatively decorous, consisting largely of litigation over rights to land formed by natural accretion, the second was intense and largely extralegal, and the third period was when the wealthy landowners who claimed the land by riparian rights consolidated their control over the area, abetted by construction undertaken by institutions of impeccable social standing, such as Northwestern University. The chapter investigates why it took so long for the struggle over Streeterville to be resolved, arguing resolution came only when the claimants with the most resources started to build substantial structures on the land. It also examines why the filled land in this area of the lakefront is overwhelmingly held in private hands, whereas the land south of the Chicago River, in what is now Grant Park, is public. Ultimately, the chapter reviews how the public trust doctrine was invoked in challenging the artificial filling of submerged land in Streeterville, and analyzes the Illinois Supreme Court decision following the case.


2020 ◽  
pp. 147-158
Author(s):  
Neal Devins ◽  
Lawrence Baum

This final chapter summarizes and extends the book’s central arguments about how elite influences are integral in shaping Supreme Court decision making. In so doing, Devins and Baum take issue with those who see the Court as being largely independent of the political world and society. At the same time, they also disagree with those who see the Court as being responsive chiefly to the other branches of government and the public. Furthermore, the authors explain that party polarization is now ingrained in the Court—so much so that the partisan divide of today is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.


1969 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Samuel Krislov ◽  
Richard M. Johnson ◽  
William K. Muir

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-212
Author(s):  
Michael McCann

The editors of this timely volume announce at the outset that their aim is to provide a forum for recent scholarship that reacts critically to the previous generation of behavioralists who, since the 1950s, have analyzed the U.S. Supreme Court as little more than an aggregate of the relatively stable and identifiable policy preferences held by individual justices. Specifically, these essays pose a collective "response by a succeeding generation of Supreme Court scholars who are trained in political behavioralism but who have rediscovered the value and importance of understanding institutional contexts" (p. 12).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document