Single premise Post canonical forms defined over one-letter alphabets

1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Hughes

AbstractIn this paper we investigate some families of decision problems associated with a restricted class of Post canonical forms, specifically, those defined over one-letter alphabets whose productions have single premises and contain only one variable. For brevity sake, we call any such form an RPCF (Restricted Post Canonical Form). Constructive proofs are given which show, for any prescribed nonrecursive r.e. many-one degree of unsolvability D, the existence of an RPCF whose word problem is of degree D and an RPCF with axiom whose-decision problem is also of degree D. Finally, we show that both of these results are best possible in that they do not hold for one-one degrees.

2014 ◽  
Vol Vol. 16 no. 1 (Automata, Logic and Semantics) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Carlos Costa

Automata, Logic and Semantics International audience The implicit signature κ consists of the multiplication and the (ω-1)-power. We describe a procedure to transform each κ-term over a finite alphabet A into a certain canonical form and show that different canonical forms have different interpretations over some finite semigroup. The procedure of construction of the canonical forms, which is inspired in McCammond\textquoterights normal form algorithm for ω-terms interpreted over the pseudovariety A of all finite aperiodic semigroups, consists in applying elementary changes determined by an elementary set Σ of pseudoidentities. As an application, we deduce that the variety of κ-semigroups generated by the pseudovariety S of all finite semigroups is defined by the set Σ and that the free κ-semigroup generated by the alphabet A in that variety has decidable word problem. Furthermore, we show that each ω-term has a unique ω-term in canonical form with the same value over A. In particular, the canonical forms provide new, simpler, representatives for ω-terms interpreted over that pseudovariety.


1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Egon Börger ◽  
Ulrich Löwen

We survey and give new results on logical characterizations of complexity classes in terms of the computational complexity of decision problems of various classes of logical formulas. There are two main approaches to obtain such results: The first approach yields logical descriptions of complexity classes by semantic restrictions (to e.g. finite structures) together with syntactic enrichment of logic by new expressive means (like e.g. fixed point operators). The second approach characterizes complexity classes by (the decision problem of) classes of formulas determined by purely syntactic restrictions on the formation of formulas.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozo J Dujmovic ◽  
Daniel Tomasevich

Computing the COVID-19 vaccination priority is an urgent and ubiquitous decision problem. In this paper we propose a solution of this problem using the LSP evaluation method. Our goal is to develop a justifiable and explainable quantitative criterion for computing a vaccination priority degree for each individual in a population. Performing vaccination in the order of the decreasing vaccination priority produces maximum positive medical, social, and ethical effects for the whole population. The presented method can be expanded and refined using additional medical and social conditions. In addition, the same methodology is suitable for solving other similar medical priority decision problems, such as priorities for organ transplants.


10.37236/1083 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron N. Siegel

The reduced canonical form of a loopfree game $G$ is the simplest game infinitesimally close to $G$. Reduced canonical forms were introduced by Calistrate, and Grossman and Siegel provided an alternate proof of their existence. In this paper, we show that the Grossman–Siegel construction generalizes to find reduced canonical forms of certain loopy games.


1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 843-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan E. Holly

AbstractWe present a canonical form for definable subsets of algebraically closed valued fields by means of decompositions into sets of a simple form, and do the same for definable subsets of real closed valued fields. Both cases involve discs, forming “Swiss cheeses” in the algebraically closed case, and cuts in the real closed case. As a step in the development, we give a proof for the fact that in “most” valued fields F, if f(x), g(x) ∈ F[x] and v is the valuation map, then the set {x: v(f(x)) ≤ v(g(x))} is a Boolean combination of discs; in fact, it is a finite union of Swiss cheeses. The development also depends on the introduction of “valued trees”, which we define formally.


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
James McCool

A group P is said to be a CEF-group if, for every countable group G, there is a factor group of P which contains a subgroup isomorphic to G. It was shown by Higman, Neumann, and Neumann [5] that the free group of rank two is a CEF-group. More recently, Levin [6] proved that if P is the free product of two cyclic groups, not both of order two, then P is a CEF-group. Later, Hall [3] gave an alternative proof of Levin's result.In this paper we give a new proof of Levin's result (Theorem 2). The proof given yields information about the factor group H of P in which a given countable group G is embedded; for example, if G is given by a recursive presentation (this concept is denned in [4]), then a recursive presentation is obtained for H, and certain decision problems (in particular, the word problem) are solvable for the recursive presentation obtained for H if and only if they are solvable for the given recursive presentation of G.


1937 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 50-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Ledermann

In this paper the canonical form of matrix pencils will be discussed which are based on a pair of direct product matrices (Zehfuss matrices), compound matrices, or Schläflian matrices derived from given pencils whose canonical forms are known.When all pencils concerned are non-singular (i.e. when their determinants do not vanish identically), the problem is equivalent to finding the elementary divisors of the pencil. This has been solved by Aitken (1935), Littlewood (1935), and Roth (1934). In the singular case, however, the so-called minimal indices or Kronecker Invariants have to be determined in addition to the elementary divisors (Turnbull and Aitken, 1932, chap. ix). The solution of this problem is the subject of the following investigation.


Open Physics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 766-779
Author(s):  
Taha Aziz ◽  
Aeeman Fatima ◽  
Chaudry Masood Khalique

AbstractThe invariant approach is employed to solve the Cauchy problem for the bond-pricing partial differential equation (PDE) of mathematical finance. We first briefly review the invariant criteria for a scalar second-order parabolic PDE in two independent variables and then utilize it to reduce the bond-pricing equation to different Lie canonical forms. We show that the invariant approach aids in transforming the bond-pricing equation to the second Lie canonical form and that with a proper parametric selection, the bond-pricing PDE can be converted to the first Lie canonical form which is the classical heat equation. Different cases are deduced for which the original equation reduces to the first and second Lie canonical forms. For each of the cases, we work out the transformations which map the bond-pricing equation into the heat equation and also to the second Lie canonical form. We construct the fundamental solutions for the bond-pricing model via these transformations by utilizing the fundamental solutions of the classical heat equation as well as solution to the second Lie canonical form. Finally, the closed-form analytical solutions of the Cauchy initial value problems for the bond-pricing model with proper choice of terminal conditions are obtained.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ben Amor ◽  
Bertrand Mareschal

Abstract.Multicriteria decision aid methods are used to analyze decision problems including a series of alternative decisions evaluated on several criteria. They most often assume that perfect information is available with respect to the evaluation of the alternative decisions. However, in practice, imprecision, uncertainty or indetermination are often present at least for some criteria. This is a limit of most multicriteria methods. In particular the PROMETHEE methods do not allow directly for taking into account this kind of imperfection of information. We show how a general framework can be adapted to PROMETHEE and can be used in order to integrate different imperfect information models such as a.o. probabilities, fuzzy logic or possibility theory. An important characteristic of the proposed approach is that it makes it possible to use different models for different criteria in the same decision problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document