Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald S. Burt
Economica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Barone ◽  
Litterio Mirenda ◽  
Sauro Mocetti

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-680
Author(s):  
Tao Song ◽  
Man Sun ◽  
Yutian Liang ◽  
Soavapa Ngampramuan ◽  
Yeerken Wuzhati ◽  
...  

SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402110071
Author(s):  
Ying Teng ◽  
Eli Gimmon ◽  
Wentong Lu

We examine how interlocking directorates influence innovation performance differentials between firms. Our study offers a new perspective of the effect of interlocking directorate ties upon innovation performance, focusing on network effects on interfirm performance. Using a sample of China’s listed companies for the period 2012–2016, we empirically examined the relationship between board interlocks and interfirm innovation performance differentials. The results demonstrate that the presence of board interlocks reduces interfirm innovation performance differentials and leads to a convergence of innovation performance between the connected companies. Furthermore, cross-level analysis found that the relationship between board interlocks and interfirm innovation performance differentials is moderated by the interfirm industry attributes and demographic characteristics of the board. This study expands the existing research in explaining the driving mechanism of enterprise innovation performance as affected by interlocking directorate ties.


Organization ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 135050842110153
Author(s):  
César Tureta ◽  
Bruno Luiz Américo ◽  
Stewart Clegg

Drawing on Actor-Network Theory and the cartography of controversies, we present a method for ANTi-History research to investigate the implementation of a contract between a labour services company and a public university hospital in Brazil. The research question focuses on how the past is enacted in the present. The method is a general guideline based on five focal points used to organize the fieldwork: identifying controversies; mapping the actor-network; drawing out the translation process; politics of actor-networks and multiple reality/power relations. The proposed method makes two contributions to ANTi-History literature. First, although these focal points have been discussed by ANTi-History scholars, they are scattered throughout the literature. We unite them to offer a guide to doing historically embedded research. Second, we show how controversy analysis can be helpful for mapping the politics of actor-networks and describing multiple realities in the construction of history.


2008 ◽  
Vol 409 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojun Liu ◽  
Edward A. Lee
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document