Linear Transformations in n-Dimensional Vector Space. An Introduction to the Theory of Hilbert Space

1953 ◽  
Vol 37 (320) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
J. L. B. Copper ◽  
H. L. Hamburger ◽  
M. E. Grimshaw
1961 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
B.N. Moyls ◽  
N.A. Khan

In 1949 Ky Fan [1] proved the following result: Let λ1…λn be the eigenvalues of an Hermitian operator H on an n-dimensional vector space Vn. If x1, …, xq is an orthonormal set in V1, and q is a positive integer such n that 1 ≤ q ≤ n, then1


Author(s):  
Suzana Mendes-Gonçalves ◽  
R. P. Sullivan

Given an infinite-dimensional vector space V, we consider the semigroup GS (m, n) consisting of all injective linear α: V → V for which codim ran α = n, where dim V = m ≥ n ≥ ℵ0. This is a linear version of the well-known Baer–Levi semigroup BL (p, q) defined on an infinite set X, where |X| = p ≥ q ≥ ℵ0. We show that, although the basic properties of GS (m, n) are the same as those of BL (p, q), the two semigroups are never isomorphic. We also determine all left ideals of GS (m, n) and some of its maximal subsemigroups; in this, we follow previous work on BL (p, q) by Sutov and Sullivan as well as Levi and Wood.


1985 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Reynolds ◽  
R. P. Sullivan

Let X be a set and the semigroup (under composition) of all total transformations from X into itself. In ([6], Theorem 3) Howie characterised those elements of that can be written as a product of idempotents in different from the identity. We gather from review articles that his work was later extended by Evseev and Podran [3, 4] (and independently for finite X by Sullivan [15]) to the semigroup of all partial transformations of X into itself. Howie's result was generalized in a different direction by Kim [8], and it has also been considered in both a topological and a totally ordered setting (see [11] and [14] for brief summaries of this latter work). In addition, Magill [10] investigated the corresponding idea for endomorphisms of a Boolean ring, while J. A. Erdos [2] resolved the analogous problem for linear transformations of a finite–dimensional vector space.


1993 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming–Huat Lim

AbstractLet U be a finite dimensional vector space over an infinite field F. Let U(r) denote the r–th symmetric product space over U. Let T: U(r) → U(s) be a linear transformation which sends nonzero decomposable elements to nonzero decomposable elements. Let dim U ≥ s + 1. Then we obtain the structure of T for the following cases: (I) F is algebraically closed, (II) F is the real field, and (III) T is injective.


1985 ◽  
Vol 100 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 123-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Reynolds ◽  
R. P. Sullivan

SynopsisIn 1966, J. M. Howie characterised the transformations of an arbitrary set that can be written as a product (under composition) of idempotent transformations of the same set. In 1967, J. A. Erdos considered the analogous problem for linear transformations of a finite-dimensional vector space and in 1983, R. J. Dawlings investigated the corresponding idea for bounded operators on a separable Hilbert space. In this paper we study the case of arbitrary vector spaces.


1952 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 650
Author(s):  
R. V. Kadison ◽  
H. L. Hamburger ◽  
M. E. Grimshaw

1963 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Solomon

Let K be a field of characteristic zero. Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over K and let S be the graded ring of polynomial functions on V. If G is a group of linear transformations of V, then G acts naturally as a group of automorphisms of S if we defineThe elements of S invariant under all γ ∈ G constitute a homogeneous subring I(S) of S called the ring of polynomial invariants of G.


Author(s):  
Dugald Macpherson

AbstractLet k be an infinite cardinal, F a field, and let GL(k, F) be the group of all non-singular linear transformations on a ki-dimensional vector space V over F. Various examples are given of maximal subgroups of GL(k, F). These include (i) stabilizers of families of subspaces of V which are like filters or ideals on a set, (ii) almost stabilizers of certain subspaces of V, (iii) almost stabilizers of a direct decomposition of V into two k-dimensional subspaces.It is also noted that GL(k, F) is not the union of any chain of length k of proper subgroups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document