Othello, Original Practices

2019 ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Rob Conkie
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Luca Barra ◽  
Massimo Scaglioni

In recent years, the completed transition towards a fully developed multichannel environment and the growth of non-linear offers has brought to the Italian television (TV) landscape unprecedented attention on the ways in which programmes are communicated to the audience and their images and identities are carefully built. The preparation and circulation of promos have therefore grown in importance and relevance in the national TV industry, as new original practices emerged and a long-lasting tradition was challenged by new formats and goals. Building on a set of in-depth interviews with professionals involved in the writing, production and distribution of promos, and analysis of other production materials, the article reconstructs the ‘promotional cultures’ of Italian broadcasters, analysing the main production processes, the different kinds of promos and the various skills involved, and the logics and constraints involved in the making of these ephemeral paratexts that more and more are pervading both the structure of programming flow and the experience of national TV viewers. Thus, the article investigates the professional practices and logics of contemporary commercial and pay TV programme promotion in Italy, defining the role played by national private broadcasters and transnational groups in shaping an Italian promotional space on TV. The ‘Italian style’ of TV show promotion emerges as a constant negotiation between local historical traditions and clichés, on the one hand, and international trends in promo production and aesthetics, on the other, with a solid path shared with other countries and broadcasters, and some peculiar specificities.


1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Pittman

Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) has been identified as the species that can best complement the salmon farming industry in Norway. From an experimental fry production of only 2 in 1985 to a production of over 350000 in 1994 and commercial sales of 60 t in 1995, the advances have accumulated through close cooperation between research and industry. Current practices involve holding the broodstock on natural or controlled photoperiod, stripping and disinfecting eggs before incubation in darkness, controlling larval placement in the water column, and first-feeding on natural zooplankton in green water. Many of the original practices are being examined with a critical eye, such as use of salt during removal of bottom water and the necessity of maintaining the larvae in darkness beyond 150 degree-days. Early temperature regimes play a role in viability, and experimental evidence points to changing temperature optima with size and to effects of light and photoperiod on growth, behaviour and survival in most stages. Challenges include identification of the period in which pigmentation is affected by exogenous nutrients, control and synchronization of metamorphosis, early identification and separation of the fast-growing females in the populations, and prevention of the early maturation in males. These and other biological and environmental requirements of the developing halibut must be better understood to achieve predictable production routines.


Author(s):  
Susan Bennett

‘Experimental Shakespeare’ considers the various meanings of ‘experimental’ as it has been attributed to productions of the plays in the last fifty years. It looks at innovation in performance style as well as the criticism these stage practices have inspired. In addition, the chapter considers the emergence and popularity of a ‘global’ Shakespeare and how audiences engage non-English-language and postcolonial productions in diverse cultural markets. Finally, it looks at the idea of original practices productions in replica theatre buildings and considers what effects are produced by claims to an authentic Shakespearean performance practice. Each of these traditions of ‘experimental’ Shakespeare contributes to the ongoing cultural and economic impact of the playwright and his work.


Author(s):  
Evelyn O'Malley

Historically the appearance of twelve men dressed as satyrs, who are introduced as “having danced before the king” in The Winter’s Tale, have assisted with dating Shakespeare’s play in the same year as Ben Jonson’s masque, Oberon, The Fairy Prince (1611). Stone No More, a devised performance created by the author for the Exeter Northcott Theatre, United Kingdom, took this moment of intertextuality as its inspiration, and, working with what is known of the dances, music, and written texts for the two sources, set out to reimagine the progression from chaos to harmony in both works, considering tensions at the boundaries of reconstruction and adaptation. While an emphasis on historical reconstruction in early dance practice can be read alongside narratives of “authenticity” or “original” practices in Shakespeare, the chapter argues that implementing early dance can invigorate Shakespearean adaptations in an alternative context by refiguring fragments and dancing with the archive.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent Griffin

Over the past twenty years or so, performance-based efforts to recreate the staging conditions and production modes of Elizabethan/Jacobean playhouses through “original practices” (OP) have developed at a considerable rate. One has only to note the popular appeal of theatre companies working from Early Modern architectural replicas (like London's Bankside Globe or Virginia's Blackfriars) to recognize the pervasive influence of the “reconstructive Shakespeare” movement on our understanding and interpretation of Renaissance drama. Yet, as the name would suggest, the movement is too often grounded in a performance aesthetic predicated solely on Shakespeare's playtexts (indeed, for many, the 1623 Folio is followed with a near religious fervor). But truth be told, other playwright/practitioners of the era have far more to say on the matter of staging verse drama than Shakespeare, and made a point of publishing their thoughts directly through prefatory material, commendatory verses, pamphlets, etc. Fletcher and Heywood immediately come to mind, but this paper will focus on the most prolific critic of the period, Ben Jonson. Not to be overshadowed by the numerous commemorations of Shakespeare's death, 2016 also marked the 400th anniversary of the publication of Jonson's landmark First Folio, and a brief review of his 1616 Workes should provide ample occasion to challenge several of the “original practices” championed by bardocentric theatre companies and their educational auxiliaries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document