The Effects of Changes in State Tax Enforcement on Corporate Income Tax Collections

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Daniel P. Lynch

ABSTRACT Using a new hand-collected database on state department of revenue (DOR) expenditures, this study examines the association between changes in state corporate tax enforcement expenditures and state-level tax collections during the 2000–2008 time period. The results, after addressing endogeneity concerns using a changes specification and state fixed effects, suggest a $1 increase (decrease) in current period corporate enforcement is associated with an $8 to $11 increase (decrease) in state tax collections two years into the future. The association appears to be attenuated in states with restrictive tax policies (i.e., unitary/combined reporting and related-party add-back provisions) suggesting that enforcement and restrictive tax policies could serve as substitutes. JEL Classifications: H26; H71; H72. Data Availability: Enforcement data were hand collected from state revenue department annual reports and by contacting state corporate income tax personnel. All annual reports are publicly available.

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-383
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Lusch ◽  
James Stekelberg

In response to the rise of foreign tax haven usage by multinational corporations, several US states have enacted laws that require income from affiliated entities operating in tax haven jurisdictions to be included on the firm’s state income tax return. We examine the revenue effects of this legislation. Employing a variety of alternative empirical approaches including a difference-in-differences specification, state and year fixed effects regressions, and a synthetic control methodology, our results provide consistent evidence of a positive association between the enactment of tax haven legislation and state corporate income tax revenues in all enacting states except West Virginia. Our study contributes to the state tax policy literature and the literature on tax havens. Moreover, given that states continue to consider implementing, changing, or repealing tax haven legislation, our results inform this current policy debate.


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Jared Moore ◽  
Jeffrey Gramlich ◽  
Mary Ann Hofmann

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (s-1) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Mary Ann Hofmann

This study examines how variations in states' corporate income tax regimes affect new capital investment by business. Using U.S. state-aggregated data from 1983 to 1996, we find in pooled and fixed-effects regressions that new capital expenditures by corporations in the manufacturing sector are decreasing in the income tax burden on property (measured as the product of the statutory tax rate and the property factor weight), and increasing at a decreasing rate in investment-related tax incentives. The effect of the income tax burden on property is more pronounced for states mandating unitary taxation or the throwback rule. Triangulating our empirical findings with prior analytical and simulation studies suggests the following hierarchy for the relative importance of major attributes of state corporate income tax regimes: the unitary or throwback requirement is most influential on incremental capital investment, followed by apportionment weights and tax rates, and, finally, investment-related incentives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-694
Author(s):  
Saeed Solaymani

PurposeThis study is the first attempt to analyze the effectiveness of recent two major tax policies, the reductions in personal and corporate income taxes and a rise in indirect tax and their combine, under both balanced and unbalanced budget conditions, on the economy and social aspects of Malaysia.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a computable general equilibrium model to investigate the impacts of all simulation scenarios on the key macro and micro indicators. Further, based on the 2012 Malaysia Household Income and Expenditure Survey, it uses a micro-data with a significant number of households (over 56,000 individuals) to analyze the impacts of tax policies on poverty and income inequality of Malaysian.FindingsSimulation results show that, under the balanced budget condition, personal and corporate income tax reductions increase economic growth, household consumption, and investment, while the rise in indirect tax has adverse impacts on these variables. However, in the unbalanced budget condition, all tax policies, except indirect tax policy, reduce real GDP and investment in the economy and the indirect tax policy has insignificant impacts on all indicators. All policy reforms reallocate resources, especially labor, in the economy. In both budget conditions, the reductions in corporate and personal income taxes, particularly the corporate income tax, decrease poverty level of Malaysian households. Results also indicate that both tax policies are unable to influence income inequality in Malaysia.Social implicationsThis study recommends that the government can increase its revenue by increasing indirect taxes as it does not have any impact on household welfare. In order to increase government revenues, initial increases in personal and corporate income taxes are suggested as they may have small negative impacts on the economy and welfare of households.Originality/valueOne of the significant features of this paper is that it examines both expansionary and contractionary fiscal policies in a country that government budget depends on oil exports. Since the literature on this subject is limited, particularly in the Malaysian context, the authors used Malaysia as a case to show how tax reform policies affect the economy and poverty level of such countries. Distinguishing the Malaysian households into 10 deciles and analyzing the distributional impacts of tax policies on these categories are the most significant contributions of this study.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Gupta ◽  
Jared A. Moore ◽  
Jeffrey D. Gramlich ◽  
Mary Ann Hofmann

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beaufort B. Longest

The question of whether federal tax-exemption policy for nonprofit hospitals is moving to a clearer and more robust quid pro quo basis is examined. The question is important because heretofore the basis for federal exemption has been vague and fluid. Utilizing a quid pro quo rationale for federal tax-exemption of nonprofit hospitals as a framework, the chronological record of policy in this area is organized into three major periods: (1) A Simple Quid pro Quo: Early Federal Tax Policies for Nonprofit Hospitals; (2) A Changing Quid pro Quo: The Modern Era of Federal Tax Policy for Nonprofit Hospitals; and (3) An Emergent, Clearer Quid pro Quo: Recent Congressional Activism on Exemption Policy, including relevant provisions of the ACA. The article concludes with discussion of continuing vagueness and ambiguity in federal corporate income tax policy for nonprofit hospitals. The importance of enhanced clarity and specificity in the information upon which policy in this area is based is discussed, as are actions needed by Congress and the Internal Revenue Service to accomplish improved exemption policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-397
Author(s):  
Whitney L. Rostad ◽  
Katie A. Ports ◽  
Shichao Tang ◽  
Joanne Klevens

Foster care caseloads, an indicator of child maltreatment, are increasing. Children living in poverty are significantly more likely to be reported to the child welfare system and are overrepresented in foster care. Thus, it is critical to identify prevention strategies that can stem the flow of foster care entries, particularly among populations at higher risk. We used variations in the adoption and refund status of state-level Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), a socioeconomic policy intended to reduce poverty, to examine their effect on foster care entry rates. Fixed-effects models, accounting for year- and state-fixed effects, demonstrated that a refundable EITC was associated with an 11% decrease in foster care entries compared to states without a state-level EITC after controlling for child poverty rate, racial/ethnic composition, education, and unemployment. Policies that strengthen economic supports for families may prevent child maltreatment and reduce foster care entries and associated costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document