Two-year Clinical Effectiveness of Adhesives and Retention Form on Resin Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
S-Y. Kim ◽  
K-W. Lee ◽  
S-R. Seong ◽  
M-A. Lee ◽  
I-B. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Observation Period

Clinical Relevance Over a two–year observation period, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation compared to Adper Prompt. Restorations using retention forms showed a significantly higher retention rate in an experimental adhesive and significantly less marginal discoloration in all three adhesives.

scholarly journals Effects of Total and Selective Bonding on Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Class I Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
T. N. Göhring ◽  
T. Attin ◽  
A. Bindl
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance Within the limitations of the current study, the use of glass ionomer liners improves the margin quality of Class I resin composite restorations and reduces leakage.

Five-year Randomized Clinical Trial on the Performance of Two Etch-and-rinse Adhesives in Noncarious Cervical Lesions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
TP Matos ◽  
TA Hanzen ◽  
R Almeida ◽  
C Tardem ◽  
MC Bandeca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Dihydrogen Phosphate ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Repeated Measures Anova ◽  
Etch And Rinse

SUMMARY Objectives: To evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL). Methods and Materials: The sample comprised 35 adults with at least two similar-sized NCCL. Seventy restorations were placed, according to one of the following groups: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB) and Ambar (AM). The restorations were placed incrementally using a resin composite (Opallis). The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 and 18 months and 5 years using some items of the FDI criteria. The differences in the ratings of the two materials after 6 months, 18 months, and 5 years were performed with Friedman repeated measures ANOVA by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α=0.05). Results: Five patients did not attend the 60-month recall. No significant differences were observed between the materials for any criteria evaluated. Twenty-one restorations failed (12 for SB and 9 for AM) after 60 months. Thus, the retention rate for SB at 60 months were 55.6% for SB and 71% for AM (p=0.32). After 60 months, 12 restorations (6 for SB and 6 AM) showed some loss of marginal adaptation (p=1.0). Slight marginal discoloration was observed in 10 restorations (6 for SB and 4 AM; p=0.91). Five restorations (2 for SB and 3 for AM) showed recurrences of caries (p=1.0). Conclusions: Both two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives—Adper Single Bond 2, a polyalkenoic acid-containing adhesive, and Ambar, a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing adhesive—showed acceptable clinical performance after 60 months.

Influence of Surface Treatment on Composite Adhesion in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
AC Rocha ◽  
WLO Da Rosa ◽  
AR Cocco ◽  
AF Da Silva ◽  
E Piva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Mechanical Removal

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of dentin surface treatments on the retention rate of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Seven randomized clinical trials were included in this review. Data regarding retention rate, type of surface treatment, and the main characteristics of studies were analyzed. Two reviewers performed a literature search up to December 2016 in eight databases: PubMed (Medline), Lilacs, Ibecs, Web of Science, BBO, Scopus, Scielo and The Cochrane Library. Only clinical trials evaluating dentin surface treatments in resin composite restoration in NCCLs were included. Noncontrolled clinical trials, reviews, editorial letters, case reports, case series and studies published in a language other than English, Portuguese, or Spanish were not included. The included studies evaluated different surface treatments, such as using an adhesive system with a frictional technique, drying the dentin, and removing sclerotic dentin by using a bur and applying EDTA before primer use. The analysis considering the mechanical removal of dentin surface with a bur and the application of an adhesive system in a frictional mode showed these treatments improved retention rates of the resin composite restorations in NCCLs (p<0.05). There is evidence in the literature suggesting that the mechanical removal of dentin surface with a bur and the application of an adhesive system in a frictional mode could improve the retention rates of resin composite restorations in NCCLs. However, the studies showed high heterogeneity, and additional clinical trials are needed to determine the best dentin treatment option in NCCLs.

The Clinical Effectiveness of Various Adhesive Systems: An 18-Month Evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Moosavi ◽  
S Kimyai ◽  
M Forghani ◽  
R Khodadadi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
United States Public Health ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Public Health Services ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the clinical performance of three different adhesive systems over 18 months in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Thirty patients, with at least three noncarious cervical lesions, were enrolled in the study. One operator randomly restored a total of 90 lesions with resin composite (Herculite XRV). The restorations were bonded with either Optibond FL (OF), three-step total-etch; Optibond Solo Plus (OS), two-step total-etch; or Optibond All-In-One (OA), one step self-etch. The restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and after six, 12, and 18 months using the eight United States Public Health Services criteria. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests (p<0.05). After 18 months, the retention rate was (OF) 96.5%, (OS) 93.1%, and (OA) 89.7%. Differences among the three adhesive systems for evaluated criteria were not observed in comparison of the mean Alfa score percentages. There was a significant increase in marginal discoloration for (OA) adhesive after 18 months compared with baseline (p=0.011). Other restoration criteria had no statistically significant differences among the three adhesives (p>0.05). With the exception of marginal discoloration, the clinical effectiveness of three types of adhesive systems in NCCLs was acceptable after 18 months. However, using the one-step self-etch adhesive may lead to some marginal discolorations.

Influence of Beveling and Ultrasound Application on Marginal Adaptation of Box-only Class II (slot) Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-84 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
K. Wolleb ◽  
T. Imfeld ◽  
M. Gygax ◽  
A. Lussi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ultrasound Application

Clinical Relevance Beveling box-only Class II cavities is necessary to improve the marginal quality of restorations. Where beveling is impossible or difficult to achieve, ultrasound may improve marginal quality.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Gingival Microleakage of Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts

10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Fiber Inserts

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.

Factors Associated with Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Gap Size ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Placement Technique

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.

Role of Additional Retention on Marginal Adaptation and Sealing of Large Resin Composite Class II Restorations

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Ishikiriama ◽  
R. F. L. Mondelli ◽  
S. C. Kano ◽  
A. Ishikiriama ◽  
J. Mondelli
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Marginal Adaptation

Clinical Relevance Retention grooves in proximal box cavities can minimize microleakage and improve marginal adaptation of large resin composite Class II restorations.

scholarly journals Marginal Permeability of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson ◽  
E. F. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Anatomy ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Decreased leakage was associated with Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (total etch) and iBond (self-etch) systems in Class V resin composite restorations. All adhesive systems performed best when bonded to enamel compared to dentin surface anatomy. Clinicians should be aware that strict adherence to manufacturer instructions, when using these materials, is of primary importance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document