Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure patients: an appraisal of recent cardiovascular outcome trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Duygu Kocyigit ◽  
Alime S. Kocyigit ◽  
Muzna Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter

4113Glucose lowering drugs or strategies, major adverse cardiovascular events and heart failure outcomes, and association with weight loss - meta-analysis of large cardiovascular outcome trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O R Ghosh-Swaby ◽  
S G Goodman ◽  
L A Leiter ◽  
A Cheng ◽  
K Connelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Lower Weight ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Background Glucose lowering drugs or strategies (GLDS) have varied effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF) in cardiovascular outcomes trials. Mechanisms driving cardiovascular risk reduction remain elusive. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and meeting abstracts up to 11/21/2018 for large GLDS cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) in patients with or at risk for type 2 diabetes. Primary endpoints of MACE and HF were evaluated with random effects risk ratios (RR) and explored by baseline CVD subgroups and meta-regression by weight change across treatment arms. Results In 27 GLDS CVOTs, a total 207,820 patients, median age 63 years, 64% male, 64% CVD and 11% with prior HF were studied over a mean 3.8 years with 20,118 (10%) patients having MACE and 7,212 (4%) a HF event. Compared with standard care, GLDS overall lowered MACE (RR 0.92, P<0.ehz745.01171) but not HF (RR 1.01, P=0.91). Across GLDS, the magnitude and directionality varied modestly for MACE RR (P-int=0.07) but markedly for HF (P-int<0.ehz745.01171). Meta-regression showed a change in HF RR by 6% (95% CI 3%-9%) per 1 kg weight gain/loss between treatment arms (P=0.0006; Figure). In 9 trials of GLDS that achieved marked weight loss (lifestyle, GLP1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors), MACE benefit was confined to patients with baseline CVD (RR 0.89 [0.84–0.95] versus without (RR 1.02 [0.91–1.15]; P-int=0.01) with consistent HF effect (RR 0.80 [0.72–0.88] vs RR 0.76 [0.56–1.03]; P-int=0.74). Heart Failure Risk and Changes in Weight Conclusion HF outcomes were improved with GLDS that lower weight. Among diabetes GLDS that lower weight, there was a robust risk reduction in atherothrombotic and heart failure events, with the MACE benefit confined to patients with established CVD. Acknowledgement/Funding Heart and Stroke Foundation

scholarly journals Emerging glucose-lowering therapies: a guide for cardiologists

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav S Gulsin ◽  
Matthew P M Graham-Brown ◽  
Melanie J Davies ◽  
Gerry P McCann
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Emerging Treatments ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
Safety Considerations

In recent large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials, two new classes of glucose-lowering medications—sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)—demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These findings have prompted growing optimism among clinicians regarding the potential for these agents to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in people with T2DM. GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i are now advocated as second-line agents in European and US guidelines for management of both hyperglycaemia and for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with T2DM. Given the high prevalence of T2DM in patients with cardiovascular disease, cardiologists will increasingly encounter these agents in routine clinical practice. In this review, we summarise evidence from cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i, give practical advice on prescribing and detail safety considerations associated with their use. We also highlight areas where further work is needed, giving details on active clinical trials. The review aims to familiarise cardiologists with these emerging treatments, which will be increasingly encountered in clinical practice, given the expanding representation of T2DM in patients with cardiovascular disease. Whether these drugs will be initiated by cardiologists remains to be determined.

scholarly journals How should we monitor the cardiovascular benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition?

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Tanaka ◽  
Koichi Node
Keyword(s):  
Sglt2 Inhibitor ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
Cardiovascular Benefit

AbstractSodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are increasingly prescribed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart failure (HF). The mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors reduce such risk are likely to be independent of diabetes status and improvement of glycemic control. In this commentary, based on recent mediation analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials with SGLT2 inhibitors, we discuss the prognostic role of a well-known HF-related biomarker, amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. Interestingly, the NT-proBNP concentration had a relatively small impact on the SGLT2 inhibitor-associated benefit on HF events, suggesting a limited value in measuring NT-proBNP concentrations to monitor effects on cardiovascular outcomes after initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. Instead, clinical factors, such as body weight and volume status, were prognostic for cardiovascular outcomes. As shown in some biomarker studies, short-term SGLT2 inhibitor treatment significantly improved volume and HF-related health status, despite the absence of a significant change in NT-proBNP concentration. Given the early and continuous risk reduction in HF events seen in the cardiovascular outcome trials with SGLT2 inhibitors, changes in these fundamental clinical parameters after initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, independent of NT-proBNP, could be more prognostic and could represent key determinants to identify responders or non-responders to SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular outcomes. Thus, this commentary highlights the clinical importance of establishing how clinicians should monitor patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy to predict the expected cardiovascular benefit. Further detailed investigations and discussion to better understand this ‘‘black box’’ are urgently warranted.

scholarly journals Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs Saxagliptin and SAVOR-TIMI 53

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-36
Author(s):  
Miles Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trial

SAVOR-TIMI 53 was the first FDA-mandated cardiovascular outcome trial to be presented and published. It compared saxagliptin and placebo in 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes. SAVOR-TIMI 53 demonstrated non-inferiority for major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) but not superiority. An unexpected statistically significant increase in adjudicated hospitalisation for heart failure was seen in the saxagliptin group. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that subjects at greatest risk for hospitalisation for heart failure had previous heart failure, an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min, or elevated baseline levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide. As other dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are available which have not been associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation for heart failure, saxagliptin should be avoided in patients with heart failure or a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate.

scholarly journals Prevalent and Incident Heart Failure in Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 1379-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
George L. Bakris ◽  
Matthew R. Weir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Incident Heart Failure
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document