scholarly journals Pemberian Plyometric Training Depth Jump Terhadap Tinggi Lompatan Vertical Jump Pada Pemain Bola Voli

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-136
Author(s):  
Wahyuni Wahyuni ◽  
Nur’alif Kukuh Ardian ◽  
Salma Muazarroh
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Plyometric Training

scholarly journals Effects of Plyometric vs. Combined Plyometric Training on Vertical Jump Biomechanics in Female Basketball Players

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Alberto Sánchez-Sixto ◽  
Andrew J Harrison ◽  
Pablo Floría
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Combined Training

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effects of plyometric training and combined training programs on vertical jump kinematics and kinetics of female basketball players. Thirty-six female basketball players were included in the study and further divided into three groups: plyometric training, n = 11; combined training n =13; and a control group, n =12. Combined training comprised full squat exercise with low resistance (50-65% 1RM) and low volume (3-6 repetitions/set) combined with repeated jumps. Plyometric training included drop jumps and repeated jumps. Both training methods showed a moderate increase in jump performance, although combined training achieved substantially higher values than plyometric training alone. After plyometric training, the vertical velocity and displacement of the center of mass of the countermovement jump increased, while force variables decreased. Combined training increased power, vertical velocity and displacement of the center of mass, but force variables remained unchanged. Both training methods improved jump height, velocity and displacement of the center of mass. Combined training maintained force measures while plyometric training decreased them. These results indicate that combined training might provide better outcomes on jump performance than plyometric training alone. It also appears important to measure biomechanical variables to appropriately interpret the effects of different training methods.

scholarly journals The Effects Of High Volume Aquatic Plyometric Training On Vertical Jump, Muscle Power, And Torque

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Miller ◽  
Adam H Ploeg ◽  
Travis J Dibbet ◽  
William R Holcomb ◽  
David C Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Power ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Plyometric Training

scholarly journals Short-Term Compound Training on Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players

Sports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athos Trecroci ◽  
Marco Duca ◽  
Damiano Formenti ◽  
Giampietro Alberti ◽  
F. Marcello Iaia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
The Other ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Squat Jump ◽  
Change Of Direction ◽  
Compound Training ◽  
Strength Exercises

This study aimed to investigate the effects of a five-week compound training (with strength and plyometric exercises performed on separate days) on sprint, change of direction, and vertical jump in young soccer players. Eighteen novices in strength and plyometric training were assigned to either a compound training (CMPT) or a control condition (CNT). Both groups trained three times per week. One session was dedicated to soccer-specific drills. The other two weekly sessions were dedicated to circuit-based training routines employing on one-day strength exercises and on the other day plyometric exercises in the CMPT group. At the same time, the CNT group performed two weekly soccer-specific training sessions. All players were tested by 15-m sprint, change-of-direction and acceleration test (CODAT), squat jump, and countermovement jump with arms swing tests. CMPT group improved CODAT, squat jump and countermovement jump to a higher extent compared to CNT group (large vs small or trivial effects, p < 0.05), while both groups had similar 15-m sprint performance (p > 0.05). These results support the use of compound training to improve change of direction and vertical jump performances in young novice soccer players, which are unfamiliar with structured and advanced strength and plyometric training.

ENHANCING MUSCULAR PERFORMANCE IN WOMEN: COMPOUND VERSUS COMPLEX, TRADITIONAL RESISTANCE AND PLYOMETRIC TRAINING ALONE

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 1450007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Arazi ◽  
Abbas Asadi ◽  
Somayeh Roohi
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
T Test ◽  
Compound Versus ◽  
Muscular Endurance ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Sprint Time ◽  
Muscular Performance ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Complex Training ◽  
Versus Complex

The aim of the current study was to explore the effects of compound (CPD) versus complex training (COX), resistance and plyometric training alone on vertical jump (VJ) height, 20-m sprint time, agility T-test, muscular strength, and endurance in women. A total of 29 healthy women volunteered to participate in this study and were randomly divided into four training groups: plyometric training alone (PT, n = 8), resistance training (RT) alone (RT, n = 7), CPD training (one day PT and another day RT, n = 7), and COX (PT and RT in a session, n = 7). All participants performed their training program twice a week for six weeks and were tested in VJ, sprint (20-m), agility T-test, one repetition maximum leg press (1RMLP), and muscular endurance (60% of 1RMLP) pre- and post-six weeks training period. Statistically, significant improvements were observed in all groups in VJ, 1RMLP, and muscular endurance: PT (19% [ES = 1.59], 45% [ES = 2.95], and 51% [ES = 1.86]), RT (20% [ES = 1.02], 48% [ES = 3.82], and 68% [ES = 2.24]), CPD (27% [ES = 1.79], 40% [ES = 4.23], and 34% [ES = 0.72]), and COX (17.5% [ES = 1], 37% [ES = 1.63], and 65% [ES = 2.25]), respectively. Also, significant decrease was observed in all groups in 20-m sprint time and T-test: PT (15% [ES = 1.01], and 7.6% [ES = 1.1]), RT (7% [ES = 0.89], and 6% [ES = 0.97]), CPD (15% [ES = 1.75], and 8% [ES = 1.1]), and COX (9% [ES = 0.72], and 3% [ES = 0.46), respectively. We found that PT, RT, and combined PT and RT induced positive effects on performance of the women. Also, the CPD group exhibited greater increase in agility performance in comparison to PT. With regard to ES, the CPD group showed greater increase in muscular performance in comparison to other groups.

Aquatic Plyometric Training Increases Vertical Jump in Female Volleyball Players

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1814-1819 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREGORY F. MARTEL ◽  
MATTHEW L. HARMER ◽  
JENNIFER M. LOGAN ◽  
CHRISTOPHER B. PARKER
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Volleyball Players

EFFECTS OF PLYOMETRIC TRAINING AND RECOVERY ON VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE AND ANAEROBIC POWER

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S273 ◽  
Author(s):  
P E. Luebbers ◽  
M W. Hulver ◽  
J P. Thyfault ◽  
M J. Carper ◽  
R H. Lockwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Anaerobic Power ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Jump Performance

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Complex Training on Vertical Jump Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-265
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Pagaduan ◽  
Haris Pojskic
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
The Other ◽  
Plyometric Training ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Plyometric Exercise ◽  
Traditional Resistance Training ◽  
Complex Training ◽  
The Difference

AbstractComplex training (CT) is a strength training intervention performed by completing all the sets of a resistance exercise followed by a series of high-velocity/plyometric exercise/s. The purpose of this novel study was to conduct a meta-analysis on the effect of CT on vertical jump (VJ) performance. Five electronic databases were searched using terms related to CT and the VJ. Studies needed to include randomized trials comparing CT with traditional resistance training (RT)/plyometric training (PLYO)/control (CON) lasting ≥ 4 weeks and the VJ as a dependent variable. Seven studies qualified for the meta-analysis with two studies differentiating VJ performance from CT and RT, two studies comparing VJ performance of CT and PLYO, and two studies establishing the difference in VJ performance between CT and CON. Results indicated similar improvement in VJ performance from CT and RT (p = 0.88). On the other hand, greater VJ performance in CT than PLYO was identified (ES = 0.86; 95% CI 0.24, 1.47; p = 0.01). CT also showed significantly greater enhancement in VJ compared to CON (ES = 1.14; 95% CI 0.60, 1.68; p < 0.01). In conclusion, CT can serve as alternative training from RT in improving VJ performance. On the other hand, CT is a better option in VJ enhancement than PLYO and CON.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document