scholarly journals Vaginal mesh surgery is efficient to treat pelvic organ prolapse grade 3 in elderly women

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
O. S. Korotkevich ◽  
V. G. Mozes ◽  
I. A. Eizenakh ◽  
A. V. Soloviev ◽  
V. V. Vlasova

Aim. To evaluate the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse grade 3 in elderly women.Materials and Methods. We consecutively recruited 86 elderly women (60 to 75 years old) suffering from pelvic organ prolapse grade 3. Out of them, 56 patients underwent vaginal mesh surgery while 30 refused surgical treatment. After 1 year, we assessed stress urinary incontinence using a cough test and Valsalva maneuver. Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale whereas quality of life was assessed by Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PDFI-20). The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms while the secondary outcome measure was the frequency of stress urinary incontinence and low quality of life upon 1 year of follow-up.Results. After 1 year of follow-up, patients who received a surgical treatment were characterized by a statistically significant decrease in both frequency and intensity of complaints and symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score was 8.3 (4.2-12.5) and 79.2 (79.2-100) in patients with or without surgical treatment respectively. Similar results were showed using Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score (6.2 (3.1-6.2) and 68.8 (62.5-71.9) and Urinary Distress Inventory score (8.3 (4.2-8.3) and 83.3 (79.2-87.5), in treated and untreated individuals, respectively. Total Pelvic Floor Disability Index score was 22.8 (11.5-27.0) in women who underwent a vaginal mesh surgery and 227.2 (226.1251.0) in those who did not. All indicated differences were statistically significant.Conclusions. Vaginal mesh surgery is efficient for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse grade 3 in elderly women.

Author(s):  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Jinsong Han ◽  
Yiting Wang ◽  
Ying Yao ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for subjective recurrence and complications of patients who underwent transvaginal synthetic mesh surgery. Design:This retrospective cohort study included patients who received transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery between January 2005 and June 2019. Methods: The information of patients was collected, including basic characteristics, subjective recurrence, and mesh-related complications. The clinical characteristics of patients with and without subjective recurrence were compared. The sexual activities of patients before and after the operation were recorded. SPSS 20.0 was used for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 257 patients were included. Among them, 62 (24.1%) patients were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up time was 80 months (12 months, 170 months). Finally, 195 patients were followed up, 11 (5.6%) patients had a subjective recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse, and 26 (13.3%) patients had mesh-related complications (11 patients with de novo pain and 15 patients with mesh exposure). We found significant differences in age (68.9±5.1 vs. 63.4±5.8 years old), years of post-menopause (17.5±6.3 vs. 13.3±6.9 years), previous hysterectomy (27.3% vs. 6.0%), and concomitant hysterectomy (45.5% vs. 81.0%) between patients with and without subjective recurrence (P<0.05). The mesh exposure proportion of patients with total vaginal mesh (47.6%) was significantly higher than that with anterior vaginal mesh (2.9%) (P<0.05). Furthermore, 6.7% of sexually active patients reported do novo dyspareunia. Limitation: The investigators could only record the subjective recurrence of patients, thus there is a lack of objective recurrence data. Conclusion: Age, years of post-menopause and previous hysterectomy are risk factors for subjective recurrence of transvaginal mesh surgery; however,concomitant hysterectomy is a protective factor. Mesh exposure is the most common complication, especially for total vaginal mesh repair surgery.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadesse Belayneh ◽  
Abebaw Gebeyehu ◽  
Mulat Adefris ◽  
Guri Rortveit ◽  
Janne Lillelid Gjerde ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures the quality of care from the patient’s perspective. PROs are an important measure of surgical outcome and used to calculate health gains after surgical treatment. We assessed HRQoL in women undergoing surgical repair of POP. Methods Two hundred fifteen women with stage III or IV prolapse underwent surgical POP repair between February 2018 and May 2019. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL-20) was administered at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess HRQoL. Depressive symptoms and body image also evaluated. Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare pre and postoperative HRQoL scores and investigate potential predictors. Results Participant’s mean age was 49.3 ± 9.4 years. Most (81.9%) had stage III prolapse and underwent a vaginal hysterectomy, although 40% preferred uterine preservation. No differences were seen between women follow-up and those lost to follow-up in HRQoL (p > 0.05). The P-QoL, depressive symptoms, and body image were improved 6 months post-operatively. The change in P-QoL significantly associated with body image scores. The type of surgery did not show a significant difference. Being married showed an improvement in the personal relationship subscale score (β = 5.8, p < 0.01). Conclusions Our results indicated a potential improvement of HRQoL after surgical treatment. The result could be useful for patient counseling on the expected HRQoL outcomes of surgical treatment. Surgical service should be accessible for women suffering from POP to improve HRQoL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadesse Belayneh ◽  
Abebaw Gebeyehu ◽  
Mulat Adefris ◽  
Guri Rortveit ◽  
Janne Lillelid Gjerde ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Symptomatic prolapse impairs quality of life. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is considered an important outcome of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. However, it is rarely reported, and measures are inadequately used. Thus, studies reporting patient-reported surgical outcomes in low-income contexts are needed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of prolapse surgery on patient HRQoL and determine the predictive factors for change in HRQoL. Methods A total of 215 patients who had prolapse stage III or IV were enrolled. Patients underwent vaginal native tissue repair, and their HRQoL was evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Effect of surgery on subjective outcomes were measured using validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL-20), Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Body Image in Prolapse (BIPOP), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Patient Global Index of Improvement (PGI-I) tools. A linear mixed-effect model was used to compare pre- and postoperative P-QoL scores and investigate potential predictors of the changes in P-QoL scores. Results In total, 193 (89.7%) patients were eligible for analysis at 3 months, and 185 (86.0%) at 6 months. Participant’s mean age was 49.3 ± 9.4 years. The majority of patients had prolapse stage III (81.9%) and underwent vaginal hysterectomy (55.3%). All domains of P-QoL improved significantly after surgery. Altogether more than 72% of patients reported clinically meaningful improvement in condition-specific quality of life measured with P-QoL-20 at 6 months. An improvement in POP-SS, BIPOP, and the PHQ-9 scores were also observed during both follow-up assessments. At 6 months after surgery, only 2.7% of patients reported the presence of bulge symptoms. A total of 97.8% of patients had reported improvement in comparison to the preoperative state, according to PGI-I. The change in P-QoL score after surgery was associated with the change in POP-SS, PHQ, BIPOP scores and marital status (p < 0.001). However, age, type of surgery, and prolapse stage were not associated with the improvement of P-QoL scores. Conclusions Surgical repair for prolapse effectively improves patient’s HRQoL, and patient satisfaction is high. The result could be useful for patient counselling on the expected HRQoL outcomes of surgical treatment. Surgical service should be accessible for patients suffering from POP to improve HRQoL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojuan Wang ◽  
Yisong Chen ◽  
Changdong Hu ◽  
Keqin Hua

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall outcomes and complications of transvaginal mesh (TVM) placement for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with different meshes with a greater than 10-years of follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with POP who underwent prolapse repair surgery with placement of transvaginal mesh (Prolift kit or self-cut Gynemesh) between January 2005 and December 2010. Baseline of patient characteristics were collected from the patients’ medical records. During follow-up, the anatomical outcomes were evaluated using the POP Quantification system, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) was used to assess the response of a condition to therapy. Overall postoperative satisfaction was assessed by the following question: “What is your overall postoperative satisfaction, on a scale from 0 to 10?”. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results In total, 134 patients were included. With a median 12-year (range 10–15) follow-up, 52 patients (38.8%) underwent TVM surgery with Prolift, and Gynemesh was used 82 (61.2%). 91% patients felt that POP symptom improved based on the PGI-I scores, and most satisfied after operation. The recurrence rates of anterior, apical and posterior compartment prolapse were 5.2%, 5.2%, and 2.2%, respectively. No significant differences in POP recurrence, mesh-associated complications and urinary incontinence were noted between TVM surgery with Prolift versus Gynemesh. Conclusions Treatment of POP by TVM surgery exhibited long-term effectiveness with acceptable morbidity. The outcomes of the mesh kit were the same as those for self-cutmesh.


Author(s):  
Sònia Anglès-Acedo ◽  
Cristina Ros-Cerro ◽  
Sílvia Escura-Sancho ◽  
M. José Palau-Pascual ◽  
Eduardo Bataller-Sánchez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. e3177
Author(s):  
S. Serni ◽  
S. Morselli ◽  
P. Verrienti ◽  
M. Di Camillo ◽  
L. Gemma ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Takahashi ◽  
Daisuke Obinata ◽  
Takahiro Sakuma ◽  
Yusuke Nagane ◽  
Katsuhiko Sato ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document