O propulsor mandibular pode ser usado com incisivos inferiores vestibularizados?

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (52) ◽  
pp. 81-87
Author(s):  
Stenyo Wanderley Tavares ◽  
Marjorie Barbosa de Almeida Oliveira

An excellent alternative to Class II treatment are fixed mandibular propulsion appliances. In general, they are devices that do not cause significant changes in the maxilla or mandible because they promote Class II correction primarily by dental alterations through an increase in the lower incisors inclination, decrease of upper incisors inclination, and occlusal plane rotation. The question is if it is possible to use this type of device, even with the lower dental compensation already present, that is, with the lower incisors vestibularized. The objective of this study is to show through a clinical case the use of mandibular propulsion with this type of malocclusion.

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till Edward Bechtold ◽  
Young-Chel Park ◽  
Kyung-Ho Kim ◽  
Heekyu Jung ◽  
Ju-Young Kang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate treatment stability of miniscrew-anchored maxillary distalization in Class II malocclusion. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included a distalization (n = 19) and a control (n = 19) group; a patient group with minor corrections served the control. Lateral cephalograms of 38 adult patients were taken before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 3–4 years after (T2) treatment. Horizontal and vertical movement and tipping of the maxillary first molars (U6) and central incisors (U1) were measured along with skeletal craniofacial parameters at three time points to compare the two groups regarding the achieved treatment effects and their stability. Results Total arch distalization therapy led to 4.2 mm of distal movement of U6 without distal crown tipping (0.6° of axis change) and 3.3° of occlusal plane steepening. Over an average retention period of 42 months, maxillary total arch distalization provided high stability of treatment results, showing the same amount of mesial movement (0.7 mm) as the control group. Conclusions In Class II treatment, miniscrew-anchored maxillary total arch distalization can provide stable distal movement of the maxillary first molars and central incisors.


Author(s):  
Michal Sarul ◽  
Marek Nahajowski ◽  
Grzegorz Gawin ◽  
Joanna Antoszewska-Smith

Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate how daily wear time (DWT) influences class II malocclusion treatment efficiency. Materials and methods The study group consisted of 55 patients (mean age 10.4 years) diagnosed with a class II/1 malocclusion. Twin block appliances, with built-in Theramon® microsensors (MC Technology, Hargelsberg, Austria) to monitor patients’ cooperation (daily wear time assessment), were used for treatment. Cephalograms were taken and the following initial and final measurements were compared: Co-Gn, Co-Go, Co-Olp, Pg-Olp, WITS, SNA, SNB, ANB, Co-Go-Me, overjet, molar and canine relationships. The Shapiro–Wilk test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Student’s t-test, Levene’s test, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, χ2 test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient with p < 0.05 set as the statistical significance level were used to determine the correlation of the outcomes with DWT; a ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was calculated to illustrate diagnostic ability of the binary classifier system. Results DWT was very highly positively correlated with change of the Pg-Olp parameter and highly with an improvement in the ANB, SNA, and SNB angles, an increase in the WITS parameter and an increase in Co-Gn distance. DWTs < 7.5 h correlated with significantly less improvement of the investigated variables. However, DWT > 7.5 h did not significantly correlate with the improvement of the overjet and most of the linear parameters in the mandible. The ROC curve and its AUC (area under curve) allowed the determination of a DWT of 7 h and 48 min to be capable of establishing a class I relationship with 83% probability. Conclusions Class II treatment efficiency was influenced by DWT; an 8 h threshold value had an 83% probability of establishing a class I relationship.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 436-442
Author(s):  
Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira ◽  
Gabriel Querobim Sant’Anna ◽  
Maria Claudia Wagner ◽  
Aron Aliaga-DelCastillo ◽  
Mayara Paim Patel ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Ruf ◽  
Margareta Bendeus ◽  
Hans Pancherz ◽  
Urban Hägg

Abstract Objective: To assess possible differences in dentoskeletal effects and “effective” temporomandibular joint, maxilla, and chin changes between good and bad responders to van Beek activator treatment. Materials and Methods: The subject material consisted of 20 consecutive normodivergent male Class II division 1 patients treated with a van Beek activator. Because of insufficient cooperation, four patients were excluded. Lateral head films were taken 6 months before treatment, at start of treatment, and after 12 months of treatment. The patients were placed into a good responder group (successful, n = 8) and a bad responder group (unsuccessful, n = 8). An overjet reduction ≥4 mm was considered successful. Results: During the van Beek treatment period, the good responders showed a significantly larger improvement in overjet and molar relationship than did the bad responders. The good responders exhibited a significant posterior development of condylion, less anterior mandibular autorotation, retrusion of upper incisors, protrusion of lower incisors, distalization of maxillary molars, and a mesial movement of mandibular molars. No significant dental movements were seen in the bad responders. Conclusions: Although van Beek activator treatment affected the direction of condylar growth, as well as the direction of maxilla and chin changes, it can be concluded that skeletal changes did not contribute to the Class II correction. Instead, overjet reduction during van Beek activator treatment was found to be due to a favorable dental reaction.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio de Abreu Vigorito ◽  
Gladys Cristina Dominguez ◽  
Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dentoskeletal changes observed in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrognathism. Treatment was performed with the Herbst orthopedic appliance during 13 months (phase I) and pre-adjusted orthodontic fixed appliance (phase II). METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 17 adolescents were taken in phase I onset (T1) and completion (T2); in the first thirteen months of phase II (T3) and in phase II completion (T4). Differences among the cephalometric variables were statistically analyzed (Bonferroni variance and multiple comparisons). RESULTS: From T1 to T4, 42% of overall maxillary growth was observed between T1 and T2 (P < 0.01), 40.3% between T2 and T3 (P < 0.05) and 17.7% between T3 and T4 (n.s.). As for overall mandibular movement, 48.2% was observed between T1 and T2 (P < 0.001) and 51.8% between T2 and T4 (P < 0.01) of which 15.1% was observed between T2 and T3 (n.s.) and 36.7% between T3 and T4 (P < 0.01). Class II molar relationship and overjet were properly corrected. The occlusal plane which rotated clockwise between T1 and T2, returned to its initial position between T2 and T3 remaining stable until T4. The mandibular plane inclination did not change at any time during treatment. CONCLUSION: Mandibular growth was significantly greater in comparison to maxillary, allowing sagittal maxillomandibular adjustment. The dentoalveolar changes (upper molar) that overcorrected the malocclusion in phase I, partially recurred in phase II, but did not hinder correction of the malocclusion. Facial type was preserved.


2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramirez Silvia ◽  
Siguencia Valeria ◽  
Garcia Andres ◽  
Bravo Manuel

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
Kizi Gunel ◽  
Alves Valter ◽  
Barata Ana ◽  
Carvalho Marta ◽  
Delgado Ana

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Gianelly
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document