Climate change-conscious systematic conservation planning: A case study in the Peace River Break, British Columbia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Jerrica Mann

The synergistic effects of anthropogenic disturbance, habitat fragmentation and climate change pose a significant threat to biodiversity that is challenging to predict. Anthropogenically driven climate change has already begun to impact critical climate regions and is now recognized to be one of the most serious threats to biodiversity and the conservation thereof. Despite this, few conservation planning initiatives have sought to sharpen the focus of the systematic conservation planning (SCP) framework to explicitly include climate change. To promote the evolution of the SCP framework into a climate change-conscious (CCC) approach to conservation planning, I developed and applied a methodology for incorporating climatechange resiliency into the SCP framework. This CCC-SCP methodology can be used to guide future conservation planning initiatives, helping conservation planners recognize and respond to opportunities for action, conserve our planet’s biodiversity and mitigate the effects of climate change.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Christopher Morgan

Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) is the practice of comprehensively assessing a landscape for its conservation value via geospatial analysis. This research project applied SCP principles and tools to Tsay Keh Dene Nation Territory in north-central British Columbia, Canada. Working with the Tsay Keh Dene community, we articulated conservation goals and determined important features on the landscape that helped attain those goals. This effort also examined climate change and connectivity impacts on conservation, comparing which lands are most worth conserving today versus 30 and 60 years from now. Finally, this work explored the interweaving of Traditional Ecological Knowledge with the Western science-based SCP framework to ensure a more holistic and inclusive outcome. Our findings both validated ongoing conservation efforts in the Territory and identified additional high-value areas for future consideration. This research can also serve as a guide for other accessible TEK-focused or community-led SCP efforts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Banu Kaya özdemirel

Cross taxa congruence was investigated between butterfly taxa and ecological community for fine spatial scale (10 × 10 km² UTM grids) in north-eastern part of Turkey. The study area was evaluated within the scope of systematic conservation planning, and analyses were performed for sets of priority protected areas composed using complementarity-based site selection software Marxan. Cross taxa congruence was subsequently examined both in species richness and ecologic complementarity. Accordingly, it has been observed that the cross-taxon congruence between butterfly taxa and ecological community was relatively better than the results of previous studies. Another remarkable finding is that ecological community was a more robust surrogate than butterfly taxa. Although the results are valuable for conservation studies, they highlight the fact that a simple surrogate-based site selection would be inadequate to represent overall biodiversity.  The weakness of congruence patterns among surrogates would also lead to gaps in biodiversity conservation. These findings therefore draw attention to the necessities of incorporating surrogates of distinct ecology or some other surrogates like environmental parameters into conservation planning. Otherwise, there may be mistakes regarding species representation and the vast majority of species may be misrepresented in protected areas and protected area plans. At this point, it should be emphasized that understating cross taxa congruence and/or relationships is a key component for efficient biodiversity conservation.


Oryx ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Smith ◽  
Peter S. Goodman ◽  
Wayne S. Matthews

Systematic conservation planning is widely considered the most effective approach for designing protected area and other ecological networks. However, many conservation practitioners still ignore these methods and we suggest that five perceived limitations of this process are affecting its uptake. These perceptions are that (1) systematic conservation planning software is difficult to use, (2) the process requires extensive biodiversity distribution data, (3) setting targets for representing conservation features is not possible, (4) the advantages of systematic conservation planning do not outweigh the costs, and (5) the resulting plans often identify unsuitable areas. Here we review these perceived limitations and argue they are all misplaced, although we recognize difficulties in the target setting process. We then illustrate the value of systematic conservation planning to practitioners using a case study that describes a low-cost exercise from Maputaland, South Africa. This preliminary conservation assessment measured the effectiveness of the existing reserve system and identified a number of candidate areas that could be the focus of community- or privately-run ecotourism or game ranching ventures. Our results also emphasize both the importance of producing planning outputs that are specifically targeted for stakeholders, and the role of systematic conservation planning in providing a framework for integrating different provincial, national and transnational conservation initiatives.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
April E. Reside ◽  
Nathalie Butt ◽  
Vanessa M. Adams

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (SI) ◽  
pp. 45-66
Author(s):  
Erwann Lagabrielle ◽  
Thomas Le Bourgeois ◽  
Laurent Durieux ◽  
Marc Robin ◽  
Dominique Strasberg

2009 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy M. Langsdale ◽  
Allyson Beall ◽  
Jeff Carmichael ◽  
Stewart J. Cohen ◽  
Craig B. Forster ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Pin Lin ◽  
Wei-Chih Lin ◽  
Hsin-Yi Li ◽  
Yung-Chieh Wang ◽  
Chih-Chen Hsu ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e28788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie A. Schloss ◽  
Joshua J. Lawler ◽  
Eric R. Larson ◽  
Hilary L. Papendick ◽  
Michael J. Case ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document