One of the greatest archaeological enigmas is in understanding the role of decision-making, intentionality, and interventions in plant life cycles by foraging peoples in transitions to and from low-level food production practices. We bring together archaeological, paleoecological, and botanical data to explore relationships over the past 4,000 years between people and camas (Camassia quamash), a perennial geophyte with an edible bulb common across the North American Northwest. Throughout the mid to late Holocene, people begin experimenting with selective harvesting practices through targeting sexually mature bulbs by 3,500 BP, with bulb harvesting practices akin to ethnographic descriptions firmly established by 1,000 BP. While we find no evidence that such interventions lead to a selection for larger bulbs or a reduction in time to maturity, archaeological bulbs do exhibit several other domestication syndrome traits. This establishes considerable continuity to human intervention into camas life cycles, but these dynamic relationships did not result in unequivocal morphological indications of domestication. This approach to tracking forager plant management practices offers an alternative explanatory framework to conventional management studies and can be applied to other vegetatively propagated species.