How does self-efficacy influence pain perception, postural stability and range of motion in individuals with chronic low back pain?

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal problem among adults. Individuals with chronic LBP (CLBP) can present a psychological disorder and a lack of pain self-efficacy. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the process of repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain, the lumbar range of motion, and the postural stability of patients with non-specific LBP (NSLBP) based on their level of self-efficacy. Study Design: This research used a descriptive, cross-sectional study design. Methods: This research included 60 patients with NSCLBP. Patients were classified as having “high” or “low” self-efficacy based on a median split of scores on the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. All patients received a sociodemographic questionnaire, a psychological self-reported measures (Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Rumination subscale, Magnification subscale; Helplessness subscale; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; FearAvoidance Belief Questionnaire; Physical Activity subscale; Work subscale); and completed the Temporal Summation Lifting Task, Lumbar Range of Motion, and Multi-Directional Functional Reach Test (MDFRT). Results: The results indicated that the low self-efficacy group had a shorter lumbar range of motion and lower postural stability, in addition to greater pain intensity in the temporal summation lifting task, compared with the high self-efficacy group. The analysis showed that the strongest correlation for the high self-efficacy was between fear of movement and the temporal summation lifting task, and greater scores at the psychological questionnaires, compared with the high selfefficacy group (r = 0.711; P < 0.01). The strongest correlations found for the low self-efficacy group, showed a positive relationship between pain catastrophizing and the temporal summation lifting task (r = 0.765; P < 0.01), and a strong negative association between pain catastrophizing for the magnification subscale and lumbar range of motion (r = -0.759; P < 0.01). Limitations: The results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of its crosssectional design, and therefore causal relationships cannot be established. A significant limitation of the study is that patients’ physical activity levels were not assessed, which could have influenced their ability to perform motor tasks at the perceived difficulty and fear level. Conclusions: The high self-efficacy group had less pain in the temporal summation lifting task, a greater range of motion, and a greater functional range, in addition to a lower influence of psychological factors. Key words: Low back pain, chronic pain, self-efficacy, temporal summation, range of motion, postural stability, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, low back disability

Download Full-text

Effect of Medicinal Cannabis Therapy (MCT) on Severity of Chronic Low Back Pain, Sciatica and Lumbar Range of Motion

International Journal of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine ◽

10.21767/2471-982x.100014 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 02 (01) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mustafa Yassin ◽

Avraham Garti ◽

Dror Robinson

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Range Of Motion ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Low Back ◽

Medicinal Cannabis ◽

Lumbar Range Of Motion

Download Full-text

Effect of Medicinal Cannabis Therapy (Mct) On Severity of Chronic Low Back Pain, Sciatica and Lumbar Range of Motion

Journal of Anesthesia & Pain Medicine ◽

10.33140/japm/01/02/00006 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Range Of Motion ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Sagittal Plane ◽

Treatment Protocol ◽

Adjunctive Treatment ◽

Low Back ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Medicinal Cannabis

Background: Anecdotal evidence indicates the possible efficacy of cannabis use as an adjunctive treatment in chronic low back pain. The purpose of the current study was to assess the results of treatment of patients suffering from chronic low back pain by medicinal cannabis (MCT). Methods: A cohort of 46 patients was followed for a minimum of twelve months. They were evaluated at baseline prior to MCT, 3 months later when MCT was begun and up to 12 months of MCT by patient reported outcome questionnaire (SF-12), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), back specific function was assessed using the Oswestry score, range of motion was measured using the Saunders digital inclinometer. Opiate use was assessed using pharmacy dispensation records at baseline and after 12 months of MCT. Inclusion criteria included: age over 25 years, sciatica with documented treatment for at least 12 months, evidence on CT or MRI scan of disc herniation or spinal stenosis, failure of at least two narcotic drugs, and consent to use medicinal cannabis. Exclusion criteria included evidence of bone cancer, evidence of diabetic neuropathy, and evidence of prior psychotic reactions. Treatment protocol: Cannabis usage was at a fixed dosage of 20 grams per month, dose increase was considered at least after 6 months of treatment. The cannabis was smoked at a recommended rate of 4 dosages per day. Results: After 12 months of MCT BPI VAS decreased from 8.4 ± 1.4 to 2.0 ± 2.0; SF12-PCS improved from 47 ± 14 to 55 ± 12; SF12-MCS improved from 44 ± 6 to 50 ± 10; and sagittal plane active range of motion improved from 34º ± 8º degrees to 48º ± 8º, In conclusion, short term usage of smoked medicinal cannabis appear to improve both physical and mental function while decreasing pain levels of chronic low back pain sufferers.

Download Full-text

Differences in dynamic and postural stability based on degree of disability in patients with nonspecific chronic lower back pain: an observational study

Journal of MOVE and Therapeutic Science ◽

10.37382/jomts.v3i1.471 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mónica Grande-Alonso ◽

Raquel Pérez-Muñoz ◽

José María Aceña-García ◽

Francisco Fernando Recio-Mateo ◽

Diego Pro-Marín ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Observational Study ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Postural Stability ◽

Dynamic Balance ◽

Forward Direction ◽

Static Stability ◽

Chronic Lower Back Pain ◽

Low Back

Objetive: The main objective of this study was to analyze whether there were differences in dynamic balance and postural stability in relation to the level of disability in patients with chronic low back pain. Methodss: This is an observational study in which 60 patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain were included. All patients received a sociodemographic questionnaire, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and a series of self-reported psychological scales. To complete the evaluation, physical tests were performed in which dynamic balance and postural stability were measured. Results: Student’s t-test revealed that there were significant differences between the groups in dynamic balance with the right leg and the left leg. In contrast, there were no significant differences between the groups for the reach functional test in forward direction, left direction and right direction. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patients with chronic low back pain with high levels of disability present significantly poorer dynamic balance compared with those with low levels of disability. In contrast, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of static stability.

Download Full-text