scholarly journals 11 de setembro: das Reformas aos atentados

Reflexão ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Karolina dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
Al Qaeda ◽  

 O presente artigo pretende mostrar as ideias e acontecimentos que serviram de base ao líder da Al-Qaeda Osama bin Laden. Através da Escola Hanbali e das Reformas no mundo islâmico, surgiram teóricos que são peças fundamentais para entender os desdobramentos de grupos como a Al-Qaeda. Dessa forma, o artigo se debruça sobre os aspectos históricos e religiosos que perpassam esse meio. Através das obras do teórico Sayyid Qutb, faz-se uma abordagem a respeito do conceito de jihad, sobre o seu significado e como a questão é abordada pela Al-Qaeda.

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Jean Butler
Keyword(s):  

Sayyid Qutb Ibrahîm Husayn Shâdhilî (d. 1966) betragtes gerne som én af den moderne islamismes åndelige fædre alene ud fra den betragtning, at det er i forlængelse af hans ideologiske indflydelse, at flere yderligtgående, islamistiske bevægelser ser dagens lys i 1970’ernes og 80’ernes Mellemøsten. Det er bevægelser hvis seneste, og givetvis mest ekstreme, udløber må siges at være al-Qâ‘ida-netværket under Osama bin Laden. Primært må Qutb dog anses for at være en forfatter, hvis meget anderledes fortolkning af Koranen – som en tekst der taler direkte til sin læser – har haft enorm indflydelse på den måde, hvorpå muslimer verden over læser Koranen i dag. Derfor er Qutb, og de tanker han gjorde sig om det menneskelige, det guddommelige, og det onde, også i høj grad relevant for os i dag.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (105) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Osama Bin Laden

To the Americans:In this letter from 2002 Osama Bin Laden replies to unidentified American writers explaining why al-Qaeda is justified in attacking North American targets. The letter poses two questions: What are we fighting for? and What are we calling you to do, and what do we want from you? According to Bin Laden al-Qaeda is engaged in a fight responding to decades of Western aggression. Bin Laden presents a detailed account of the misdeeds that the United States are responsible for in the Middle East and in Afghanistan. The letter also denounces North American society as characterised by usury, debauchery, gambling, prostitution and environmental destruction. Finally Bin Laden provides the reader with a series of examples connected to the ‘war on terror’ where the United States does not live up to its own rhetoric: the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo, the suspension of civil liberties in the Patriot Act and the rejection of the Kyoto Accords.


Author(s):  
Farhan Zahid

Al-Qaeda, the premier global jihadist terrorist entity having its footprints in more than 60 countries and responsible for perpetrating the world's hitherto biggest terrorist attacks of 9/11, appears to have adopted a strategy of working in tandem with local Islamist-jihadist groups. This may be regarded as a strategic shift from directing and masterminding international terrorist attacks to collusion with its associated networks, such as Al-Shabab in Somalia and the Taliban in Afghanistan, and promoting local jihadists in Yemen, Sinai, Syria, and West Africa. Al-Qaeda‟s local chapters such as Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) are also working alongside local Al-Qaeda linked Islamist groups. It appears as if Al-Qaeda no longer subscribes to the approach it adhered to during the times of its former Emir Osama Bin Laden and has substantially re-crafted its strategy under Ayman al-Zawahiri.


Author(s):  
Daniel Byman

On the morning of September 11, 2001, the entire world was introduced to Al Qaeda and its enigmatic leader, Osama bin Laden. But the organization that changed the face of terrorism forever and unleashed a whirlwind of counterterrorism activity and two major wars had been on the scene long before that eventful morning. In Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Global Jihadist Movement: What Everyone Needs to Know, Daniel L. Byman, an eminent scholar of Middle East terrorism and international security who served on the 9/11 Commission, provides a sharp and concise overview of Al Qaeda, from its humble origins in the mountains of Afghanistan to the present, explaining its perseverance and adaptation since 9/11 and the limits of U.S. and allied counterterrorism efforts. The organization that would come to be known as Al Qaeda traces its roots to the anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Founded as the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan, Al Qaeda achieved a degree of international notoriety with a series of spectacular attacks in the 1990s; however, it was the dramatic assaults on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11 that truly launched Al Qaeda onto the global stage. The attacks endowed the organization with world-historical importance and provoked an overwhelming counterattack by the United States and other western countries. Within a year of 9/11, the core of Al Qaeda had been chased out of Afghanistan and into a variety of refuges across the Muslim world. Splinter groups and franchised offshoots were active in the 2000s in countries like Pakistan, Iraq, and Yemen, but by early 2011, after more than a decade of relentless counterterrorism efforts by the United States and other Western military and intelligence services, most felt that Al Qaeda's moment had passed. With the death of Osama bin Laden in May of that year, many predicted that Al Qaeda was in its death throes. Shockingly, Al Qaeda has staged a remarkable comeback in the last few years. In almost every conflict in the Muslim world, from portions of the Xanjing region in northwest China to the African subcontinent, Al Qaeda franchises or like-minded groups have played a role. Al Qaeda's extreme Salafist ideology continues to appeal to radicalized Sunni Muslims throughout the world, and it has successfully altered its organizational structure so that it can both weather America's enduring full-spectrum assault and tailor its message to specific audiences. Authoritative and highly readable, Byman's account offers readers insightful and penetrating answers to the fundamental questions about Al Qaeda: who they are, where they came from, where they're going-and, perhaps most critically-what we can do about it.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Taylor ◽  
Mohamed E. Elbushra

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-145
Author(s):  
Siti Fatimah ◽  
Yanuardi Syukur

After the death of Osama Bin Laden and the declaration of the establishment of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the Al-Qaeda movement changed from being aggressive to being passive. The aggressiveness of the Al-Qaeda movement, for instance, was seen during the spectacular terror of 9/11, which was then followed by various actions carried out by followers in various parts of the world. However, Bin Laden's death and the rise of the ISIS group made Al-Qaeda look passive. This paper seeks to see the history of the Al-Qaeda movement to the dynamics that influence the movement’s choices. The author found that changing Al-Qaeda's orientation from aggressive to passive did not deny the existence of a consolidated movement that deliberately distanced itself from the anti-terrorism campaign carried out by the United States.


Jurnal ICMES ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-68
Author(s):  
Rijal Mamdud
Keyword(s):  
Al Qaeda ◽  

Secara historis, munculnya terorisme yang dilakukan kelompok-kelompok Islamradikal di Timur Tengah berakar pada semangat perlawanan terhadap kolonialismeBarat pada awal abad ke-19. Ada dua gerakan yang memiliki pengaruh besardan menginspirasi kemunculan gerakan-gerakan serupa di Timur Tengah, yaituIkhwan Al Muslimin (IM) dan Al Qaeda (AQ). Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkajiakar gerakan dari organisasi Ikhwan Al Muslimin dan Al Qaeda, serta bagaimanarelasi kuasa-pengetahuan yang terjadi. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitianini adalah genealogi yang berupaya mengkaji aspek sejarah dan hubungannyadengan formulasi kuasa dan politik; serta teori Islamisme, yaitu menguraikanaspek ideologi Islam, gerakan politik Islam, serta aspek sosial-ekonominya. Temuanartikel ini menunjukkan bahwa IM dan AQ secara historis berakar pada gerakanperlawanan terhadap Barat. Pemikiran Sayyid Qutb menjadi inspirasi awal bagiradikalisasi aktivis IM, seperti Muhammad Faraj, Ayman Al Zawahiri, dan Osamabin Laden sehingga mereka membangun milisi yang lebih ekstrim, seperti Al Jihaddan Al Qaeda. IM pada awalnya adalah organisasi yang bergerak dalam bidangsosial dan akhirnya melibatkan diri dalam politik praktis. Metode gerakan Islamyang berbasis pendekatan budaya menjadikan IM diterima luas oleh masyarakatMesir, sehingga pernah berhasil menang dalam pemilu dan berada di lingkaranelit kekuasaan. Sebaliknya, AQ melakukan gerakan perlawanan terhadap Baratsekaligus pemerintah di negara-negara Muslim yang dinilai anti-Islam denganmetode teror, sehingga selalu marjinal dalam opini publik masyarakat Muslim.


2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 628-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis A. Bradley ◽  
Jack L. Goldsmith

In the fifteen years since the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) was enacted on September 18, 2001, the Taliban has been removed from power but not eliminated; Osama Bin Laden has been killed and the senior leaders of Al Qaeda as of 9/11 have been captured, killed, or driven underground, although Al Qaeda remains a threat; numerous Al Qaeda affiliates have sprung up around the globe, most notably in Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Somalia; and most ominously, the Islamic State has arisen from the ashes of Al Qaeda in Iraq to become what the Director of National Intelligence has described as “the preeminent terrorist threat” against the United States “because of its self-described caliphate in Syria and Iraq, its branches and emerging branches in other countries, and its increasing ability to direct and inspire attacks against a wide range of targets around the world.”Despite massive changes in the geographical scope of the conflict that began on 9/11, the strategy and tactics employed, and the identity of the enemy, the AUMF remains the principal legal foundation under U.S. domestic law for the president to use force against and detain members of terrorist organizations. The AUMF is already the longest operative congressional authorization of military force in U.S. history, and, as of fall 2016, there was no immediate prospect that Congress would move to repeal or update it. With the continued vibrancy of Al Qaeda, its associates, and the Taliban, and with the 2014 presidential extension of the AUMF to cover military operations against the Islamic State, the AUMF is likely to be the primary legal basis for American uses of force for the foreseeable future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document