Association between antimicrobial treatment of subclinical pneumonia in foals and selection of macrolide- and rifampicin-resistant Rhodococcus equi strains at horse-breeding farms in central Kentucky

2021 ◽  
Vol 258 (6) ◽  
pp. 648-653
Author(s):  
Laura Huber ◽  
Steeve Giguère ◽  
Kelsey A. Hart ◽  
Nathan M. Slovis ◽  
Maggie E. Greiter ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 243-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Huber ◽  
Steeve Giguère ◽  
Noah D. Cohen ◽  
Nathan M. Slovis ◽  
Amanda Hanafi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonsiray Álvarez-Narváez ◽  
Laura Huber ◽  
Steeve Giguère ◽  
Kelsey A. Hart ◽  
Roy D. Berghaus ◽  
...  

SUMMARY The development and spread of antimicrobial resistance are major concerns for human and animal health. The effects of the overuse of antimicrobials in domestic animals on the dissemination of resistant microbes to humans and the environment are of concern worldwide. Rhodococcus equi is an ideal model to illustrate the spread of antimicrobial resistance at the animal-human-environment interface because it is a natural soil saprophyte that is an intracellular zoonotic pathogen that produces severe bronchopneumonia in many animal species and humans. Globally, R. equi is most often recognized as causing severe pneumonia in foals that results in animal suffering and increased production costs for the many horse-breeding farms where the disease occurs. Because highly effective preventive measures for R. equi are lacking, thoracic ultrasonographic screening and antimicrobial chemotherapy of subclinically affected foals have been used for controlling this disease during the last 20 years. The resultant increase in antimicrobial use attributable to this “screen-and-treat” approach at farms where the disease is endemic has likely driven the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) R. equi in foals and their environment. This review summarizes the factors that contributed to the development and spread of MDR R. equi, the molecular epidemiology of the emergence of MDR R. equi, the repercussions of MDR R. equi for veterinary and human medicine, and measures that might mitigate antimicrobial resistance at horse-breeding farms, such as alternative treatments to traditional antibiotics. Knowledge of the emergence and spread of MDR R. equi is of broad importance for understanding how antimicrobial use in domestic animals can impact the health of animals, their environment, and human beings.


1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji TAKAI ◽  
Tohru ANZAI ◽  
Katsushi YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Seiko KAKIZAKI ◽  
Junko TAKAHAGI ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teotimo BECU ◽  
Tsutomu KAKUDA ◽  
Shiro TSUBAKI ◽  
Shinji TAKAI

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Takai ◽  
T. Fujimori ◽  
K. Katsuzaki ◽  
S. Tsubaki

2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Monego ◽  
Franciele Maboni ◽  
Cristina Krewer ◽  
Agueda Vargas ◽  
Mateus Costa ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina da Costa Krewer ◽  
Dênis Augusto Spricigo ◽  
Sônia de Avila Botton ◽  
Mateus Matiuzzi da Costa ◽  
Irene Schrank ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611986454
Author(s):  
Samarth P. Shah ◽  
Ana Negrete ◽  
Timothy Self ◽  
Jaclyn Bergeron ◽  
Jennifer D. Twilla

Background: The 2012 Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend antimicrobial treatment of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) post-amputation, but the optimal route and duration are poorly defined. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether the selection of a specific antimicrobial treatment modality affected hospital and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review of hospital admissions of adults admitted to ourhealthcare system with a primary diagnosis of DFIs post-amputation. The groups were separated into patients who received intravenous antimicrobials (IV), oral antimicrobials (PO), or no antimicrobials (NA). Outcomes included average length of stay among others. Results: Of the 200 patients screened, 120 patients were included (IV n = 72; PO n = 20; NA n = 28). No statistically significant differences were identified in average LOS (IV = 9.97 ± 5.85, PO = 8.83 ± 7.37, NA = 9.33 ± 5.91 days; p = 0.73). However, post-operative (post-op) LOS was significantly shorter in the PO group (PO = 3.43 ± 2.56, IV = 7.34 ± 5.95, NA = 5.81 ± 4.18 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that a PO antimicrobial treatment strategy post amputation for DFIs has the potential to decrease post-op LOS without increasing the risk of readmission. Based on the results of our study, we feel consideration should be given to transition to oral antimicrobials soon after amputation to facilitate discharge and decrease the utilization of intravenous antimicrobials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document