Use of Modern Cursive Handwriting and Handwriting Speed for Children Ages 7 to 14 Years

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Ziviani
Keyword(s):  
Cursive Handwriting ◽  
Handwriting Speed

Handwriting speed of 172 children ages 7 to 14 years was faster using modern cursive handwriting than performance reported earlier using a combination of print and cursive.

Individual and Sex Differences in Speed of Handwriting among High School Students

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1428-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha R. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cursive Handwriting ◽  
Individual And Sex Differences ◽  
Handwriting Speed ◽  
Better Than

A group of 153 high school students participated in a cursive handwriting task which required them to copy sentences as quickly as possible. The 78 girls performed significantly better than the 75 boys and a substantial range of speed for each sex was found. The results have implications for more demanding writing and composition processes. Handwriting speed has the potential to act as a limiting factor under some circumstances.

Comparison of Cursive Models for Handwriting Instruction

1997 ◽  
Vol 85 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1171-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnheidur Karlsdottir
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Rate Of Convergence ◽  
School Children ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Primary School Children ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cursive Handwriting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Handwriting Speed

The efficiency of four different cursive handwriting styles as model alphabets for handwriting instruction of primary school children was compared in a cross-sectional field experiment from Grade 3 to 6 in terms of the average handwriting speed developed by the children and the average rate of convergence of the children's handwriting to the style of their model. It was concluded that styles with regular entry stroke patterns give the steadiest rate of convergence to the model and styles with short ascenders and descenders and strokes with not too high curvatures give the highest handwriting speed.

Stability and stationarity of cursive handwriting

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Duvernoy ◽  
D. Charraut
Keyword(s):  
Cursive Handwriting

A Method of Recognition of Arabic Cursive Handwriting

1987 ◽  
Vol PAMI-9 (5) ◽  
pp. 715-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Almuallim ◽  
Shoichiro Yamaguchi
Keyword(s):  
Cursive Handwriting

Min-cut segmentation of cursive handwriting in tabular documents

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian L. Davis ◽  
William A. Barrett ◽  
Scott D. Swingle
Keyword(s):  
Cursive Handwriting ◽  
Min Cut

BuddhistRoadPaper 1.2 "Toward A Typology of Chödrup’s (Tib. Chos Grub, Chin. Facheng 法成) Cursive Handwriting: A Palaeographical Perspective"

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Channa Li
Keyword(s):  
Thematic Content ◽  
Cursive Handwriting

In this paper, I focus on the palaeography of a collection of eight Tibetan manuscripts hypothesised to have been written by the same scribal hand. The eight manuscripts—IOL Tib J 217, IOL Tib J 686, IOL Tib J 687, IOL Tib J 625, IOL Tib J 588, IOL Tib J 619, P. T. 770, and P. T. 783v—are closely related, not merely in light of their sophisticated cursive handwriting, but also by virtue of their common textual genre (being summaries or commentaries rather than direct scriptural translations) and thematic content: these Tibetan texts were all based on Chinese sources and attributed to Gö Chödrup (fl. first half of the 9th c., Tib. ’Gos Chos grub, Chin. Wu Facheng 吳法成), either directly or indirectly. Moreover, many manuscripts produced by the imperial Tibetan copying project contain editorial records written in the same hand; these records indicate that Chödrup acted as the final proofreader. Therefore, we can now more confidently attribute this hand to Chödrup himself. By establishing a typology of this handwriting and offering a table of how syllables are written by this hand in the appendix, this paper contributes to a better reading of manuscripts containing this type of script and can potentially provide a benchmark for further recognition of works written in the same hand.

Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen T. Peverly ◽  
Joanna K. Garner ◽  
Pooja C. Vekaria
Keyword(s):  
Selective Attention ◽  
Lecture Note ◽  
Note Taking ◽  
Handwriting Speed
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document