ROLE OF STRATEGIES AND PRIOR EXPOSURE IN MENTAL ROTATION

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
ISABELLE D. CHERNEY
2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1269-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle D. Cherney ◽  
Nicole L. Neff

2020 ◽  
pp. 027623662095233
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Muto ◽  
Soyogu Matsushita ◽  
Kazunori Morikawa

Mental rotation is known to be mediated by sensorimotor processes. To deepen our understanding of the role of somatosensory inputs in mental rotation, we investigated the effects of holding weight by the hands on mental rotation performance. In an experiment, 22 male and 22 female students performed a chronometric mental rotation task while holding either light or heavy bags in both hands. Results showed that females holding heavy bags were quicker and more accurate at mental rotation than females holding light bags, as evidenced by shallower slopes for response times (RTs) and error rates. In contrast, males showed no such heavy-bag-induced improvement. Unlike slopes, intercepts for RTs and error rates were equivalent regardless of sex and bag weight. Consistent with previous research on embodied cognition, the present findings demonstrated the facilitatory role of somatosensory cues by weight in mental rotation and suggested sex differences in embodied processes in mental rotation.


NeuroImage ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. S117 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Belin ◽  
C. Moroni ◽  
F. Gelbert ◽  
Y.S. Cordoliani ◽  
P. Delaporte
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 35 (2b) ◽  
pp. 135-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Hall ◽  
Stephen Channell

In two experiments rats were trained on a simultaneous discrimination in a jumping stand. On each trial choice always lay between one stimulus (an obliquely striped object in Experiment I, and a plain grey object in Experiment II) and a second that varied from trial to trial. On half the trials this variable stimulus bore horizontal stripes (H) and on the remaining trials it bore vertical stripes (V). It was argued that the solution of this discrimination would be hindered if the animals tended to classify H and V apart (Bateson and Chantrey, 1972). It was found, however, that prior exposure to H and V in the home cage (which has been supposed to promote classifying apart) facilitated learning and that prior exposure to H and V in the apparatus itself (which might be thought to promote classifying together) hindered later learning. Possible alternative accounts for these exposure learning effects are discussed.


1980 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Young ◽  
Sandra R. Palef ◽  
Gordon D. Logan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document