Attributions of Athletes on Collegiate Sports Teams

2004 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darhl M. Pedersen ◽  
Craig L. Manning
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (GROUP) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Samantha Kolovson ◽  
Calvin Liang ◽  
Sean A. Munson ◽  
Kate Starbird

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Lauren Deckelbaum

Since the passage of Title IX in 1972, the number of female coaches in the United States has grown due to an increased number of female sports offered at the collegiate level. However, the percent of female collegiate sports teams coached by women has dropped from 90% to 42.9% (Acosta & Carpenter, 2012) suggesting that female coaches are not benefiting from the growth in women’s athletic opportunities. The purpose of this project was to examine research articles published within the past 40 years that focused on female coaches to understand the female coaches’ experiences.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Roth ◽  
Daniel A. Schmerling ◽  
Nick C. Koenig ◽  
Brandon L. Young ◽  
Robert D. Pritchard
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Robert O. Deaner ◽  
Amanda McClellan ◽  
Virgil Zeigler-Hill ◽  
Joyce F. Benenson

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-32
Author(s):  
James Du ◽  
Christopher McLeod ◽  
Jeffrey James
Keyword(s):  

Focaal ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Vasiliki P. Neofotistos

Using the Republic of North Macedonia as a case study, this article analyzes the processes through which national sports teams’ losing performance acquires a broad social and political significance. I explore claims to sporting victory as a direct product of political forces in countries located at the bottom of the global hierarchy that participate in a wider system of coercive rule, frequently referred to as empire. I also analyze how public celebrations of claimed sporting victories are intertwined with nation-building efforts, especially toward the global legitimization of a particular version of national history and heritage. The North Macedonia case provides a fruitful lens through which we can better understand unfolding sociopolitical developments, whereby imaginings of the global interlock with local interests and needs, in the Balkans and beyond.


Laws ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Sharrow

Between 2020 and 2021, one hundred and ten bills in state legislatures across the United States suggested banning the participation of transgender athletes on sports teams for girls and women. As of July 2021, ten such bills have become state law. This paper tracks the political shift towards targeting transgender athletes. Conservative political interests now seek laws that suture biological determinist arguments to civil rights of bodies. Although narrow binary definitions of sex have long operated in the background as a means for policy implementation under Title IX, Republican lawmakers now aim to reframe sex non-discrimination policies as means of gendered exclusion. The content of proposals reveal the centrality of ideas about bodily immutability, and body politics more generally, in shaping the future of American gender politics. My analysis of bills from 2021 argues that legislative proposals advance a logic of “cisgender supremacy” inhering in political claims about normatively gendered bodies. Political institutions are another site for advancing, enshrining, and normalizing cis-supremacist gender orders, explicitly joining cause with medical authorities as arbiters of gender normativity. Characteristics of bodies and their alleged role in evidencing sex itself have fueled the tactics of anti-transgender activists on the political Right. However, the target of their aims is not mere policy change but a state-sanctioned return to a narrowly cis- and heteropatriarchal gender order.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Brad Lowery ◽  
Abigail Slater ◽  
Kaison Thies

AbstractIn this paper, we present a new model for ranking sports teams. Our model uses all scoring data from all games to produce a functional rating by the method of least squares. The functional rating can be interpreted as a team average point differential adjusted for strength of schedule. Using two team’s functional ratings we can predict the expected point differential at any time in the game. We looked at three variations of our model accounting for home-court advantage in different ways. We use the 2018–2019 NCAA Division 1 men’s college basketball season to test the models and determined that home-court advantage is statistically important but does not differ between teams.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document