Public Pension Funding Ratios Still Tumbling

CFA Digest ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-111
Author(s):  
Claire Emory
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALICIA H. MUNNELL ◽  
JEAN-PIERRE AUBRY ◽  
LAURA QUINBY

AbstractPublic pension funding has recently become a front-burner policy issue in the wake of the financial crisis and given the pending retirement of large numbers of baby boomers. This paper examines the current funding of state and local pensions using a sample of 126 plans, estimating an aggregate funded ratio in 2009 of 78% using GASB accounting methods. Projections for 2010–2013 suggest that some continued deterioration is likely. Funded status can vary significantly among plans, and so the paper explores the influence of four types of factors: funding discipline, plan governance, plan characteristics, and the fiscal situation of the state. Judging the long-term health of plans requires more than just a snapshot of assets and liabilities, and so the paper examines how well plans are meeting their Annual Required Contributions and what factors influence whether they make them. The paper also addresses the controversy over what discount rate to use for valuing liabilities, concluding that using a riskless rate of return could help improve funding discipline but would need to be implemented in a manageable way. Finally, the paper assesses whether plans face a near-term liquidity crisis and finds that most have assets on hand to cover benefits over the next 15–20 years. The bottom line is that, like private investors, public plans have been hit hard by the financial crisis and their full recovery is dependent on the rebound of the economy and the stock market.


Author(s):  
Gang Chen ◽  
Kenneth Kriz ◽  
Carol Ebdon

Public pension plans in the U.S. are seriously underfunded, especially following the financial market crisis of 2008-2009 which resulted in large investment losses. However, funding levels vary widely across plans. Pension boards of trustees make key management decisions in pension systems and these decisions have significant effects on funded levels, yet our empirical knowledge of board management is limited. This study explores the effect of board composition on pension funding levels. Existing theoretical debates lead to differing expectations, and previous studies have mixed results. Our research uses a panel data set of large public pension plans from 2001-2009. We also collect data for pension board composition from this time period. We find that increasing political appointees and employee members on the board increases the funding performance of the pension system.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Munnell ◽  
Jean-Pierre Aubry ◽  
Laura Quinby

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Bong Hwan Kim ◽  
Joong Gi Ahn
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maura Francese ◽  
Daniele Franco ◽  
Pietro Tommasino

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Dove ◽  
Courtney Collins ◽  
Daniel J. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document