scholarly journals Dermoscopic Features of Basal Cell Carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-281
Author(s):  
Danica Tiodorović ◽  
Andrija Jović ◽  
Danijela Popović ◽  
Hristina Kocić ◽  
Aleksandra Ignjatović ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study was to analyze the dermoscopic features in patients with pathohistologically confirmed basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Our retrospective study included 54 patients with 76 BCCs in total, diagnosed in 2016 and 2017. All lesions were classified into four clinical types: nodular, pigmented, superficial and infiltrative. Digital dermoscopic images were evaluated by three observers. We selected five dermoscopic features for analysis, including: the absence of pigment network, the presence of arborizing vessels, blue-gray globules and ovoid nests, leaf-like areas and ulcerations. In the total of 54 patients, there were 22 females and 32 males. At the moment of establishing the diagnosis, the patients’ age was in the range from 31 to 84 years (median age 67 years). The most frequent clinical type was the nodular type with 28 confirmed diagnoses. Nodular BCC was more frequently localized on the head and neck areas compared to the trunk and limbs (p < 0.01). Dermoscopically, the absence of pigmented network was verified in all cases. Arborizing vessels were present in 71 (93.4%) lesions, blue-gray globules and ovoid nests in 33 (42.1%), ulcerations in 44 (57.9%), and leaf-like areas in 5 (6.6%) lesions. Blue-gray globules and ovoid nests were significantly frequent in pigmented BCC in comparison to other clinical types of BCC (p < 0.01). In conclusion, using dermoscopy, it is entirely possible to make a reliable diagnosis of BCC as well as to differentiate it from others skin tumors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1321-1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa M. Kuiper ◽  
Bente A. van den Berge ◽  
Julia R. Spoo ◽  
Jeroen Kuiper ◽  
Jorrit B. Terra

2016 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. S36
Author(s):  
Anupam Rishi ◽  
Shao Hui Huang ◽  
Yuyao Song ◽  
John Waldron ◽  
Brian O’Sullivan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 607-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Miszczyk ◽  
Michał Charytonowicz ◽  
Tomasz Dębski ◽  
Bartłomiej Noszczyk

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Boaventura ◽  
Rosa Oliveira ◽  
Dina Pereira ◽  
Paula Soares ◽  
José Teixeira-Gomes

Dermatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 236 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke C.J. van Delft ◽  
Patty J. Nelemans ◽  
Myrurgia Abdul Hamid ◽  
Nicole W.J. Kelleners-Smeets

Background: The histological subtype of basal-cell carcinoma (BCC) is often based on a punch biopsy; only a small part is evaluated, possibly leading to misclassification. Consensus on the optimal approach to process punch biopsies is lacking, though accurate subtyping is important for appropriate treatment. Objective: The aim is to investigate whether evaluating 4 levels of a punch biopsy instead of 1 or 2 levels leads to more accurate subtyping of BCC. Methods: In a retrospective study we evaluated 87 punch biopsies of histologically confirmed BCCs. The primary outcome was the proportion of “more aggressive” BCCs (nonsuperficial vs. superficial, infiltrative vs. nodular subtype) that was missed by evaluation on 1 or 2 levels, using 4-level diagnosis as reference standard. Results: Eighty-five cases were available for analysis. Subtyping based on 1 level resulted in discrepancies with 4-level diagnosis in 16.5% of all cases. Underdiagnosis occurred in 14 of 58 nonsuperficial BCCs (24.1%, 95% CI: 13.9–37.2). Seven of 38 nodular BCCs (18.4%, 95% CI: 7.74–34.3) were diagnosed as superficial in 1 level, and 7 of 20 infiltrative BCCs (35%, 95% CI: 15.4–59.2) were diagnosed as superficial (n = 2) or nodular (n = 5) in 1 level. Conclusion: In order to maximize correct subtyping and plan appropriate treatment, we advise to evaluate at least 2, but preferably more, levels of a punch biopsy to determine the BCC subtype.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart H. Bentkover ◽  
Donald M. Grande ◽  
Henry Soto ◽  
Beth A. Kozlicak ◽  
Donna Guillaume ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document