scholarly journals Sectoral Interdependencies and Key Sectors in the Romanian, Hungarian and Slovak Economy – An Approach Based on Input-Output Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emese Balla

Abstract The aim of this paper is to analyse sectoral interdependencies and to identify the key sectors in the Romanian, Hungarian and Slovak economy, drawing a comparison between these three countries. In order to do these investigations, input-output analysis is applied, as it is based on a model which presents interactions between sectors of the economy. This method can also be used for determining the role of each sector in the national economy regarding its contribution to the total output, incomes, exportimport and so on, and for quantifying direct and indirect impact on the whole economy caused by any change produced in a sector’s activity. As the results of the analyses show, several similarities and differences appear in the economic structure, the sectoral interdependencies and the key sectors of the analysed countries. For example, in Romania, intersectoral transactions are axing mainly on the Trade and Manufacturing sectors, while in Hungary and Slovakia on the Manufacturing and Other professional, scientific and technical services sectors. Key sectors - identified by applying output and income backward linkages - also differ as in Romania the output backward linkage is the largest in the case of the Trade sector, in Hungary, in the Food sector and in Slovakia in the Electricity, gas, water and waste management sector. In the case of the income linkages, Social, collective and personal services rank in the first place in all three countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-245
Author(s):  
Muchdie Muchdie ◽  
Muhammad Handry Imansyah

Results of analysis on inter-sector and inter-country linkages in Indonesian economy using world input-output data for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2014 are provided in this paper. The model was aggregated into 30 sectors and 8 countries. Inter-sector linkages are analyzed using forward and backward effect indices, and then sectors were grouped into 4 groups. Meanwhile inter-county linkage is analyzed is spill-over and feed-back effects. The results showed that firstly, number of sectors include in Group-1, namely key sectors with strong forward and backward linkages: two sectors in year 2000, one sector in year 2005, 8 sectors in year 2010 and 2014. Secondly, spill-over effects were significantly importance in Indonesia economy, as around 20 per cent of multipliers occurred in other countries: 19.74 per cent in year 2000; 20.25per cent in year 2005; 18.19 per cent in year 2010 and20.64 per cent in year 2014. Only small feed-back effects are in Indonesian economy; in average 0.12 per cent in year 2000; 0.14 per cent in year 2005; 0.15 per cent in year 2010 and 0.15 per cent in year 2014. Finally, ignoring inter-country feed-back could be misleading as error created was significant.


Author(s):  
Đức Thị Việt Đặng

This article uses Input-output (IO) analysis to evaluate the impact of ICT on the Vietnamese economy. Two IO tables are used, including tables of 2007 and 2012. The results show that ICT sectors were small in Vietnamese economy and the spending on ICT products and services of an average sector of the economy was generally low. Regarding the impact on output of other sectors, the research results reveal that the ICT sectors' backward linkages were stronger than the forward linkages, i.e. the ICT generated more impact on sectors which provided it input rather than on sectors that used its products and services. The total output multiplying effect of the ICT was rather high; ICT was among the most influential sectors in Vietnamese economy. Among ICT sectors, the ICT manufacturing was the most pervasive which is followed by the ICT services and ICT media and content. The study implies that if Vietnam seeks to enhance the economy, the government needs to implement specific policies that facilitate ICT industry and ICT usage.


Marine Policy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Jun Kwak ◽  
Seung-Hoon Yoo ◽  
Jeong-In Chang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document