scholarly journals Medico-Legal Implications of C1 Vertebral Fractures. Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-408
Author(s):  
Tatiana Iov ◽  
Diana Bulgaru-Iliescu ◽  
Simona Damian ◽  
A. Knieling ◽  
Mădălina Maria Diac ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The upper C1-C2 column is the subject of several erroneous diagnostics. The most common mechanisms of injuries include fall from high-impact skulls, car accidents, etc. Vertebra C1 can also be injured by mild trauma. The Japanese show that atlas fractures occur in about 2-13% of the cervical spine fractures and about 1.3% of the total spinal cord injuries. It is underlined that CT examination is the most useful diagnostic method. The Czechs show that the atlas lesions appear in 1-2% of the cervical spine lesions. Americans reported fracture of the atlas in 7% of the cervical spine fractures. Even if CT has shown its value, lateral radiography is recommended in C1-C2 fractures. When victims are children or people injured in high-speed car crashes, the reported mechanisms were the fall from a high level and the impact on the tip of the flexed skull. The Italians mention that the C1-C2 area is the most exposed diagnostic area with errors. Material and methods: given the difficulty of establishing a diagnosis of C1 type fractures, we present in this paper such a case. We highlight the value of a CT scan. The victim is a 26-year-old woman with a trauma from the wall. The main issue in this case is that the diagnosis made by the radiologist seems to be wrong, the electronic and imprinted copies are of inferior quality. A second opinion revealed a very fine fracture that seemed to come from an older date than the date when the victim claimed she was assaulted. The better the lesions, the more misleading the interpretations. Any imaginary imaging lesion, especially if it is obvious in electronic reconstructions, must be brought to the attention of the physician if they are taken into account by "image". The axial CT sections may omit some lesions under certain conditions, for example at the upper and lower poles of a spherical, ovoid or cubic structure, such as the atlas lateral mass. Conclusions: the diagnostic solution in this case is the reconstruction of the axial sections in several planes. The crack can be highlighted, in the case of a reconstructed image, only after stacking the axial images. The mechanism could be through sudden compression, during a sudden head movement, uninitiated and uncontrolled by the neck muscles, when a movement occurs over the degree of elasticity of the occiput-atlas joint, the occipital condyles compressing abruptly, unilaterally one of the atlas masses. In such clinical cases, we experience pain, muscle contraction and torticollis, on a normal neurological background.

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 862-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parham Daneshvar ◽  
Darren M. Roffey ◽  
Yasser A. Brikeet ◽  
Eve C. Tsai ◽  
Chris S. Bailey ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1030-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANILO GONÇALVES COELHO ◽  
ALBERT V. B. BRASIL ◽  
NELSON PIRES FERREIRA

Eighty-nine patients with lower cervical spine fractures or dislocations were evaluated for risk factors of neurological lesion. The age, sex, level and pattern of fracture and sagittal diameter of the spinal canal were analysed. There were no significant differences on the age, gender, level and Torg's ratio between intact patients and those with nerve root injury, incomplete or complete spinal cord injuries. Bilateral facet dislocations and burst fractures are a significant risk factor of spinal cord injury.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 992-997
Author(s):  
Conor John Dunn ◽  
Stuart Changoor ◽  
Kimona Issa ◽  
Jeffrey Moore ◽  
Nancy J. Moontasri ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the management of trauma patients with cervical spine fractures by identifying high-risk patients for vertebral artery injury (VAI), and evaluating how frequently patients undergo subsequent surgical/procedural intervention as a result of these findings. Methods: All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures who underwent CTA of the head and neck at our institution between January 2013 and October 2017 were identified. Patients were indicated for CTA according to our institutional protocol based on the modified Denver criteria, and included patients with cervical fractures on scout CT. Those with positive VAI were noted, along with their fracture location, and presence or absence of neurological deficit on physical examination. Statistical analysis was performed and odds ratios were calculated comparing the relationship of cervical spine fracture with presence of VAI. Results: A total of 144 patients were included in our study. Of those, 25 patients (17.4%) were found to have VAI. Two patients (1.4%) with VAI underwent subsequent surgical/procedural intervention. Of the 25 cervical fractures with a VAI, 20 (80%), were found to involve the upper cervical region (4.2 OR, 95% CI 1.5-12.0; P = .007). Of the 25 who had a VAI, 9 were unable to undergo reliable neurologic examination. Of the remaining 16 patients, 5 (31.3%) had motor or sensory deficits localized to the side of the VAI, with no other attributable etiology. Conclusions: Cervical spine fractures located in the region of the C1-C3 vertebrae were more likely to have an associated VAI on CTA. VAI should also be considered in cervical trauma patients who present with neurological deficits not clearly explained by other pathology. Despite a finding of VAI, patients rarely underwent subsequent surgical or procedural intervention.


1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Marks ◽  
Gordon R. Reli ◽  
Francis R.S. Roumphrey

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchel B Harris ◽  
William M Reichmann ◽  
Christopher M Bono ◽  
Kim Bouchard ◽  
Kelly L Corbett ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shintaro Honda ◽  
Eijiro Onishi ◽  
Takumi Hashimura ◽  
Satoshi Ota ◽  
Satoshi Fujita ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-527
Author(s):  
Allison G. McNickle ◽  
Paul J. Chestovich ◽  
Douglas R. Fraser

AbstractBackground:Cadaveric and older radiographic studies suggest that concurrent cervical spine fractures are rare in gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the head. Despite this knowledge, patients with craniofacial GSWs often arrive with spinal motion restriction (SMR) in place. This study quantifies the incidence of cervical spine injuries in GSWs to the head, identified using computerized tomography (CT). Fracture frequency is hypothesized to be lower in self-inflicted (SI) injuries.Methods:Isolated craniofacial GSWs were queried from this Level I trauma center registry from 2013-2017 and the US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2012–2016 (head or face abbreviated injury scale [AIS] >2). Datasets included age, gender, SI versus not, cervical spine injury, spinal surgery, and mortality. For this hospital’s data, prehospital factors, SMR, and CTs performed were assessed. Statistical evaluation was done with Stata software, with P <.05 significant.Results:Two-hundred forty-one patients from this hospital (mean age 39; 85% male; 66% SI) and 5,849 from the NTDB (mean age 38; 84% male; 53% SI) were included. For both cohorts, SI patients were older (P < .01) and had increased mortality (P < .01). Overall, cervical spine fractures occurred in 3.7%, with 5.4% requiring spinal surgery (0.2% of all patients). The frequency of fracture was five-fold greater in non-SI (P < .05). Locally, SMR was present in 121 (50.2%) prior to arrival with six collars (2.5%) placed in the trauma bay. Frequency of SMR was similar regardless of SI status (49.0% versus 51.0%; P = not significant) but less frequent in hypotensive patients and those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The presence of SMR was associated with an increased use of CT of the cervical spine (80.0% versus 33.0%; P < .01).Conclusion:Cervical spine fractures were identified in less than four percent of isolated GSWs to the head and face, more frequently in non-SI cases. Prehospital SMR should be avoided in cases consistent with SI injury, and for all others, SMR should be discontinued once CT imaging is completed with negative results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document