scholarly journals Variations in biomass, production and respiration of fine roots in a young larch forest

Author(s):  
Rui CUI ◽  
Takashi HIRANO ◽  
Lifei SUN ◽  
Munemasa TERAMOTO ◽  
Naishen LIANG
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Pang ◽  
Jing Tian ◽  
Dexiang Wang

Abstract Background: Fine roots make critical contributions to carbon stocks and terrestrial productivity, and multidiameter-class fine roots exhibit functional heterogeneity. However, the dynamic characteristics of multidiameter-class fine roots at different soil depths following thinning disturbances are poorly understood. We investigated the biomass, production, mortality and turnover rate of < 0.5 mm, 0.5–1 mm and 1–2 mm fine roots at 0-20 cm, 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm soil depths under five thinning intensities (0%, 15%, 30%, 45%, and 60%) in a secondary forest in the Qinling Mountains. Results: The biomass, production and turnover rate of < 0.5 mm fine roots fluctuated with increasing thinning intensity, while 0.5-1 mm and 1-2 mm fine root biomass significantly decreased. Thinning measures had no effects on fine root necromass (except for T4) or mortality. The fine root dynamic characteristics in deeper soils were more sensitive to thinning measures. Principal component analysis results show that increased < 0.5 mm fine root biomass and production resulted from increased shrub and herb diversity and biomass and decreased soil nutrient availability, stand volume and litter biomass, whereas 0.5-1 mm and 1-2 mm fine root biomass showed the opposite trends and change mechanisms. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence of the positive effect of thinning on very fine root (< 0.5 mm) biomass and production and the negative effect on thicker fine roots (0.5-1, 1-2 mm) or all fine root (< 2 mm) biomass. From the perspective of fine root biomass and productivity, T2 (30%) is recommended for use in secondary forests of the Qinling Mountains. Moreover, our results suggest that thinning practices have varied effects on the dynamic characteristics of multidiameter-class fine roots.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjian Kong ◽  
Xing jia Xiang ◽  
Jian Yang

Abstract Background and aimsWildfire is a primary driver of ecosystem functioning, and the fire-induced changes in the cycling and balance of multiple nutrients may influence the response of plant growth to burning. However, the relationships between total and available soil stoichiometry and stoichiometric effects on the growth of fine roots following fire in forests remain unclear.MethodsWe measured the total and available soil C, N and P concentrations, their ratios and fine root biomass (FRB) at an unburned control, 1-year-postfire and 11-year-postfire sites in a Chinese boreal larch forest. The relationships between soil stoichiometry and FRB were analyzed.ResultsWildfire significantly reduced the total and available soil C:N:P ratios and FRB immediately postfire. Eleven years postfire, most indicators recovered to the pre-fire levels except total soil C:P and N:P ratios, and available C:N ratio. Wildfire immediately increased the correlations between total and available soil C:N:P ratios, as well as between FRB and soil C:N:P ratios, but reduced the correlations between FRB and soil nutrient supply. These effects became weaker over time.ConclusionsThe effects of wildfire on biogeochemical processes in boreal ecosystems extend to the relationships between total and available soil stoichiometry. Wildfire strengthens the linkage between fine roots and soil stoichiometry, but weakens the effects of soil nutrient supply in the Great Xing’an Mountains. Therefore, the effects of wildfire on the coupling of soil C, N and P cycling can produce a more complex soil-plant interaction in the postfire early succession stage of boreal larch forest.


2008 ◽  
Vol 308 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 201-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Huang ◽  
Xue-yong Zhao ◽  
Yan-gui Su ◽  
Ha-lin Zhao ◽  
Tong-hui Zhang

Planta Medica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Papaspyridi ◽  
E Topakas ◽  
N Aligiannis ◽  
P Christakopoulos ◽  
AL Skaltsounis ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Éva Lehoczky ◽  
András Kismányoky ◽  
Tamás Kismányoky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document