scholarly journals ASPEK ETIKA DAN LEGAL EUTHANASIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taufik Suryadi ◽  
Kulsum Kulsum
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Definition Of Death ◽  
Definition Of

Abstrak. Isu-isu tentang akhir kehidupan (end of life) selalu menarik untuk dibicarakan. Penentuan akhir kehidupan ini sering menjadi dilema bagi para dokter karena apabila dokter tidak memahami tentang pengambilan keputusan akhir hidup pasien ia akan menghadapi konsekuensi bioetika dan medikolegal. Terdapat beberapa istilah yang berkaitan dengan isu akhir kehidupan yaitu euthanasia, withholding and withdrawal life support, physician assisted suicide, dan  palliative care. Dengan berkembangnya ilmu kedokteran dan teknologi, definisi kematian menjadi sulit ditentukan karena dengan bantuan alat canggih kedokteran kehidupan ‘dapat diperpanjang’. Dari kenyataan inilah maka timbul pertanyaan serius: “Sampai kapan dokter harus mempertahankan kehidupan?. Apakah semua jenis pengobatan dan perawatan yang dapat  memperpanjang hidup manusia itu harus selalu diberikan?”.Dari permasalahan ini dapat didiskusikan tentang euthanasia ditinjau dari sudut bioetika dan medikolegal. Kata kunci: euthanasia, aspek bioetika, aspek medikolegal  Abstract .The issues of end of life are always interesting to discussed. This final determination of life is often a dilemma for doctors because if the doctor does not understand the final decision of the patient's life he will face the consequences of bioethics and medicolegal. There are several terms related to the issues of end of life that is euthanasia, withholding and withdrawal life support, physician assisted suicide, and palliative care. With the development of medical science and technology, the definition of death becomes difficult to determine because with the help of advanced medical devices 'life can be extended'. It is from this fact that a serious question arises: "How long should doctors maintain life? Are all types of cure and care that can extend the life of a human should always be given? "From this issues can be discussed about euthanasia in terms of bioethics and medicolegal. Keywords: euthanasia, bioethics aspect, medicolegal aspect

10. Dying and Death

2020 ◽  
pp. 532-622
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Definition Of Death ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
The Law ◽  
End Of Life Issues ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Complex Cases

This chapter examines the legal and ethical aspects of death. It begins with a discussion of the difficulty of the choosing a definition of ‘death’. It then sets out the law on a range of ‘end-of-life issues’, including euthanasia, assisted suicide, and refusal of medical treatment. It considers some particularly complex cases in which the law is not always easy to apply. These include the administration of pain-relieving drugs, the treatment of severely disabled newborn children, and the position of patients suffering from PVS. Next, the chapter considers the ethical debates surrounding euthanasia, assisted suicide, and terminating treatment. This is followed by a discussion of palliative care and hospices.

9. Dying and Death

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Definition Of Death ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
The Law ◽  
End Of Life Issues ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Complex Cases

This chapter examines the legal and ethical aspects of death. It begins with a discussion of the difficulty of the choosing a definition of ‘death’. It then sets out the law on a range of ‘end-of-life issues’, including euthanasia, assisted suicide, and refusal of medical treatment. It considers some particularly complex cases in which the law is not always easy to apply. These include the administration of pain-relieving drugs, the treatment of severely disabled newborn children, and the position of patients suffering from PVS. Next, the chapter considers the ethical debates surrounding euthanasia, assisted suicide, and terminating treatment. This is followed by a discussion of palliative care and hospices.

Palliative Care/Physician-Assisted Dying: Alternative or Continuing Care?

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Malakoff
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Dying Patients ◽  
Physician Assisted Dying ◽  
Wrongful Death

End-of-life care for dying patients has become an issue of importance to physicians as well as patients. The debate centers around whether the option of physician-assisted suicide cuts off, or diminishes the value of, palliative care. This ongoing attention makes the crafting of advance directives from patients detailing their end-of-life choices essential. Equally important is the appointment of a health care surrogate. The surrogate, when the patient is too ill to make decisions, should be empowered to make them in his stead. No American court has found a clinician liable for wrongful death for granting a request to refuse life support. An entirely separate issue is that of legalized physician-assisted suicide. As of this writing, only Oregon has made this legal (see Gonzales v. Oregon). It is likely that this issue will be pursued slowly through the state courts, making advance directives and surrogacy all the more crucial.

Terminal Sedation: Palliative Care for Intractable Pain, Post Glucksberg and Quill

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-76
Author(s):  
Rob McStay
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Terminal Sedation ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
The Right ◽  
Artificial Life Support ◽  
Unconscious State

In 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court tacitly endorsed terminal sedation as an alternative to physician-assisted suicide, thus intensifying a debate in the legal and medical communities as to the propriety of terminal sedation and setting the stage for a new battleground in the “right to die” controversy. Terminal sedation is the induction of an unconscious state to relieve otherwise intractable distress, and is frequently accompanied by the withdrawal of any life-sustaining intervention, such as hydration and nutrition. This practice is a clinical option of “last resort” when less aggressive palliative care measures have failed. Terminal sedation has also been described as “the compromise in the furor over physician-assisted suicide.”Medical literature suggests that terminal sedation was a palliative care option long before the Supreme Court considered the constitutional implications of physician-assisted suicide. Terminal sedation has been used for three related but distinct purposes: (1) to relieve physical pain; (2) to produce an unconscious state before the withdrawal of artificial life support; and (3) to relieve non-physical suffering.

scholarly journals Treatment, Palliative Care or Euthanasia? Comparing End of Life Issues in Human and Veterinary Medicine

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Eyre-Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Medicine ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
End Of Life Issues ◽  
The Uk

Not a lot is known about either death or the dying process. Politicians and many in the medical profession in the UK tend to shy away from interfering with it by not allowing euthanasia as an end of life option for the patient. This is the first paper in a series of two, comparing the situation in human medicine and veterinary medicine, in which euthanasia is well practiced for relieving suffering at the end of an animal’s life. This first part takes the form of a literature review including best practice around end of life care, its deficiencies and the need for assisted dying. Veterinary surgeons are well trained in the ethics of euthanasia and put it to good use in the best interest of their animal patients. In countries which have legalized physician assisted suicide for the terminally ill reporting indicates that it works well, without increases in involuntary euthanasia and most importantly without intimidation of the vulnerable. However, there is still an ever increasing tendency to overuse sedation and opioids at the end of life, which merits further investigation. With advances in medical science able to significantly prolong the dying process, patient autonomy demands a review of the law in the UK.

scholarly journals Treatment, Palliative Care or Euthanasia? Comparing End of Life Issues in Human and Veterinary Medicine

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Eyre-Pugh ◽  
James W. Yeates
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Medicine ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
End Of Life Issues ◽  
The Uk

Not a lot is known about either death or the dying process. Politicians and the medical profession in the UK tend to shy away from interfering with it by not allowing euthanasia as an end of life option for the patient. This is the first paper in a series of two, comparing the situation in human medicine and veterinary medicine, in which euthanasia is well practiced for relieving suffering at the end of life. This first part takes the form of a literature review including best practice around end of life care, its deficiencies and the need for assisted dying. Veterinary surgeons are well trained in the ethics of euthanasia and put it to good use in the best interest of their animal patients. In countries which have legalized physician assisted suicide for the terminally ill reporting indicates that it works well, without increases in involuntary euthanasia and most importantly without intimidation of the vulnerable. However, there is still an ever increasing tendency to overuse sedation and opioids at the end of life, which merits further investigation. With advances in medical science able to significantly prolong the dying process, patient autonomy demands a review of the law in the UK.

To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 832-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel L Gamble ◽  
Nathan K Gamble ◽  
Michal Pruski
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Ethics ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Palliative Sedation ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
End Of Life Decisions ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Life Decisions

In developing their policy on paediatric medical assistance in dying (MAID), DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport decide to treat euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as ethically and practically equivalent to other end-of-life interventions, particularly palliative sedation and withdrawal of care (WOC). We highlight several flaws in the authors’ reasoning. Their argument depends on too cursory a dismissal of intention, which remains fundamental to medical ethics and law. Furthermore, they have not fairly presented the ethical analyses justifying other end-of-life decisions, analyses and decisions that were generally accepted long before MAID was legal or considered ethical. Forgetting or misunderstanding the analyses would naturally lead one to think MAID and other end-of-life decisions are morally equivalent. Yet as we recall these well-developed analyses, it becomes clear that approving of some forms of sedation and WOC does not commit one to MAID. Paediatric patients and their families can rationally and coherently reject MAID while choosing palliative care and WOC. Finally, the authors do not substantiate their claim that MAID is like palliative care in that it alleviates suffering. It is thus unreasonable to use this supposition as a warrant for their proposed policy.

scholarly journals Requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide: A qualitative study of the wordings of requests from patients at the end of life hospitalised in palliative care units.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Mathieu-Nicot ◽  
Aline Chassagne ◽  
Daniele Leboul ◽  
Anne Bousquet ◽  
Aurélie Godard-Marceau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Initial Request ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Palliative Care Units

Abstract Background Whilst euthanasia and assisted suicide are forbidden by French Law, patients at the end of life, hospitalized in Palliative Care Units, sometimes express the Wish to Hasten their Death. Few Studies have analyzed the formulation of these patient requests in interviews and the associated death-related representations. The DESA study analyzed the expression of patients’ requests, focusing on the terms and how patients worded their wishes. The aim is to identify from the “raw wording” of the patients’ requests, the means of expressing them in all its singularity and evolution. Methods This is a qualitative study that took place in 11 French Palliative care Units during on year and included adult patients who had made an explicit request (euthanasia or physician assisted suicide) to a health care provider. Semi-structured interviews were conducted within 48 hours of the initial request (D0), then a week later (D7). Results At DO, the initial request is a request for euthanasia and it calls a third person urgently. This request is related to physical and psychological suffering, trauma and representations of death. At D7, we observe a semantic change; the request is less explicit and requires less intervention by a third party. The quest remains that of a death without suffering. Conclusions These patients express themselves easily on their request and listening is necessary to be able to hear the meaning of the words but also their functions. It is their nuance, variety and evolution that help to understand what the requirements mean. Trial registration number : ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02845817

scholarly journals Ethical considerations at the end-of-life care

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 205031212110009
Author(s):  
Melahat Akdeniz ◽  
Bülent Yardımcı ◽  
Ethem Kavukcu
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Ethical Decision Making ◽  
Biomedical Ethics ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Physician Assisted Suicide

The goal of end-of-life care for dying patients is to prevent or relieve suffering as much as possible while respecting the patients’ desires. However, physicians face many ethical challenges in end-of-life care. Since the decisions to be made may concern patients’ family members and society as well as the patients, it is important to protect the rights, dignity, and vigor of all parties involved in the clinical ethical decision-making process. Understanding the principles underlying biomedical ethics is important for physicians to solve the problems they face in end-of-life care. The main situations that create ethical difficulties for healthcare professionals are the decisions regarding resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition and hydration, terminal sedation, withholding and withdrawing treatments, euthanasia, and physician-assisted suicide. Five ethical principles guide healthcare professionals in the management of these situations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document